Page 2 of 2
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 17 May 2016, 11:34
by jamesmcdonnell
greg wrote:..Khan was doing pretty good in the first 3-4 rounds...but isn't that what we expected?..isn't that what often happens when he fights? good for a couple of first rounds, runs out of gas, starts making mistakes, gets hit...and down he goes..
Well yes.
It's like going over to some huge dude, and whacking them in the mouth out of nowhere, getting the first shot in, sure, at that point you're winning, but that becomes irrelevant when they knock seven shades of shite out of you moments later.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 17 May 2016, 12:06
by pugilisticprofessor
Khan won the first 2 but Canelo was coming on after.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 17 May 2016, 12:31
by drunkenpiper36
It doesn't matter.. Kahn got KTFO and there won't be a rematch. Amir is finished on the world scene.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 17 May 2016, 12:38
by SaadOffTheDeck
Agreed it doesn't matter and no rematch, no way he's done at the world level. This didn't hurt him at all. He'll be in several more top fights. I'd love for Spence to get his scalp after errol beats Brook.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 17 May 2016, 15:32
by SportsRatings
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Batley18 wrote:I had Khan winning 3, Canelo 1, and 1 even.
Ditto.
Tritto.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 17 May 2016, 15:34
by gilgamesh
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Agreed it doesn't matter and no rematch, no way he's done at the world level. This didn't hurt him at all. He'll be in several more top fights. I'd love for Spence to get his scalp after errol beats Brook.
I just want to see any of the Top Welterweights actually start fighting each other. The division is pretty loaded, but several of them are unbeaten because they won't damn fight each other.
Thurman
Brook
Garcia
Porter
Spence
Khan
Bradley
You can match those guys up any way you want, I'm down and I'd like to see it.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 17 May 2016, 17:26
by PsychoGamerTwo
I had Canelo 5-0. I mean, all Khan was doing, has been running.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 18 May 2016, 15:32
by SenorPipino
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Agreed it doesn't matter and no rematch, no way he's done at the world level. This didn't hurt him at all. He'll be in several more top fights. I'd love for Spence to get his scalp after errol beats Brook.
Brook will dodge boxing's up-and-coming superstar. Even protected by the security of fighting across the pond, Brook would be dismantled by Spence.
Brook will gladly allow himself to be stripped of his worthless IBF title to avoid Spence.
Even without a belt, there's probably more money (and a greater chance of winning) for him in a British showdown with Khan then a championship whupping against Spence.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 18 May 2016, 15:33
by gilgamesh
PsychoGamerTwo wrote:I had Canelo 5-0. I mean, all Khan was doing, has been running.
Yeah...except for those times when he threw combinations and hit Canelo. Moving and punching isn't running.
Canelo was doing very little in the first 5 rounds.
Re: Khan was winning?
Posted: 18 May 2016, 17:38
by PsychoGamerTwo
gilgamesh wrote:PsychoGamerTwo wrote:I had Canelo 5-0. I mean, all Khan was doing, has been running.
Yeah...except for those times when he threw combinations and hit Canelo. Moving and punching isn't running.
Canelo was doing very little in the first 5 rounds.
I was kidding, Khan did pretty good, without actually scoring the rounds, (late in Europe, been tired), it felt like he won atleast 3.
Anyway, it doesn't really matter, its a 12 round fight, not 6 rounds.