BoxRec

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote: .

.

.

.

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote:

.

.

.

.

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote: .

.

.

.

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote: .

.

.

.......

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote: .

.

.......

..........ah bless

nick885 wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

nick885 wrote:Mcfeckwit take a chill pill ye pimmell Moody or air your grievances to my face I'm at the o2 watching haskins loose, otherwise think you should keep your oppinions to yourself BOY.

What a dick. This is a forum mate, I'll express whatever opinions I like, unlike you I'm not a Neanderthal who threatens people, I'll just rip your stupid arguments apart.

Ah bless you you misunderstand, it wasn't a threat it was an invitation. When you grow up you will understand.

I'm 45 mate, not fifteen, you're the one who needs to do the growing up, and stop acting like a bell-end. That's the last comment you'll see from me as I've added you the ignore list, along with the other morons on here whose tiresome gibberings I choose to avoid.

What is wrong with this pudendum?

Stuarty30 wrote:What is wrong with this pudendum?

Frigg knows, maybe he's lost his meds?

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:What is wrong with this pudendum?

Frigg knows, maybe he's lost his meds?

You won't see him here again any time soon (unless he creates a new alias via a different ip address) ...

The Law wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:What is wrong with this pudendum?

Frigg knows, maybe he's lost his meds?

You won't see him here again any time soon (unless he creates a new alias via a different ip address) ...

How sad. Bye bye numptyman.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

The Law wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Frigg knows, maybe he's lost his meds?

You won't see him here again any time soon (unless he creates a new alias via a different ip address) ...

How sad. Bye bye numptyman.

Strange dude

Can we let him back on just for the duration of Hall v Haskins and about an hour after just so we can all have a good laugh at him?

only if Haskins literally punches Hall's face in

Counter-puncher wrote:only if Haskins literally punches Hall's face in

hey mate, please don't judge Stuey for this, he's a top bloke

I'm a friend of Stueys and I'd hate to think people judge him by the actions of someone else,

That been said if you have other reasons for thinking that then fair enough.

Crazyboy wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:only if Haskins literally punches Hall's face in

hey mate, please don't judge Stuey for this, he's a top bloke

I'm a friend of Stueys and I'd hate to think people judge him by the actions of someone else,

That been said if you have other reasons for thinking that then fair enough.

I'm sure every fighter has a few fuckwit fans, not their fault.

Crazyboy wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:only if Haskins literally punches Hall's face in

hey mate, please don't judge Stuey for this, he's a top bloke

I'm a friend of Stueys and I'd hate to think people judge him by the actions of someone else,

That been said if you have other reasons for thinking that then fair enough.

you're dead right, and I apologise. I would be rooting for Haskins but have no animosity against Hall whatsoever, quite the opposite, the punch his face in was a flippant comment on my part.

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote:

nick885 wrote: .

.

.

Did Haskins make your lass coco all over your side of the bed or something?

No, he is Halls uncle.

Is that who he is? Or was that a joke?

Just looked at his profile, 55 years old and acting like that, Christ almighty.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Is that who he is? Or was that a joke?

Just looked at his profile, 55 years old and acting like that, Christ almighty.

He is yes, he's just passionate about Stuey that's all, but I get he sometimes goes about it all wrong.

Unlike Nick I thought Stuey lost last time out, but I'm genuinely looking forward to this one as Stuey is a completely different fighter to when they last fought and I really hope he gets his revenge.

It will be difficult though, haskins is very tough to look good against and Stuey has always looked better against people who want to trade.

we will see

Crazyboy wrote:
It will be difficult though, haskins is very tough to look good against and Stuey has always looked better against people who want to trade.

we will see

Crazyboy wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Is that who he is? Or was that a joke?

Just looked at his profile, 55 years old and acting like that, Christ almighty.

He is yes, he's just passionate about Stuey that's all, but I get he sometimes goes about it all wrong.

Unlike Nick I thought Stuey lost last time out, but I'm genuinely looking forward to this one as Stuey is a completely different fighter to when they last fought and I really hope he gets his revenge.

It will be difficult though, haskins is very tough to look good against and Stuey has always looked better against people who want to trade.

we will see

Pretty childish behaviour for a grown man. Oh well, takes all sorts I suppose.