Re: David Haye vs. Shannon Briggs - TBA
Posted: 22 May 2016, 06:54
He's like a cuddly Clubber Lang.
He's like a cuddly Clubber Lang.
Anthony Joshua probably does.ThereByTheGrace wrote:who cares?wesshaw1985 wrote:who wins?
Agree with this; it's pathetic from Haye.clopixolacuphase wrote:Nobody cares about this at all. Haye could have fought Briggs as his comeback fight. It's pathetic that they've taken three fights the build to this.
I wish Haye would just go away.
asdfjkl wrote:Anthony Joshua probably does.ThereByTheGrace wrote:who cares?wesshaw1985 wrote:who wins?
Surprisingly, I expect this fight to go to distance actually, David Haye seems to me like quite featherfisted atm, but he got better lungs, so he probably wins anyway.
You marked my words already, go ahead, I really wouldn't be surprised if Briggs can take a hell of a lot more of a beating as you guys might expect.MarkMcBurney wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Anthony Joshua probably does.ThereByTheGrace wrote:
who cares?
Surprisingly, I expect this fight to go to distance actually, David Haye seems to me like quite featherfisted atm, but he got better lungs, so he probably wins anyway.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That may be the case but the referee is stopping this before 12 rounds have passed with the beating Briggs will take.asdfjkl wrote:You marked my words already, go ahead, I really wouldn't be surprised if Briggs can take a hell of a lot more of a beating as you guys might expect.MarkMcBurney wrote:asdfjkl wrote: Anthony Joshua probably does.
Surprisingly, I expect this fight to go to distance actually, David Haye seems to me like quite featherfisted atm, but he got better lungs, so he probably wins anyway.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No idea but that's a world apart from saying Haye goes the full 12 rounds with old father time. I believe he also said Fury had no chance with Klitschko prior to November too.clopixolacuphase wrote:You can laugh at our asdfjkl, but didn't he just call the Takam Parker fight right?
asdfjkl wrote:I think I can name about 10 boxers that are better as Tyson Fury, so this is just temporary talk, he'll wake up after the fight.
asdfjkl wrote: The best boxer Fury has ever won against is Chisora right?
Chisora is about as good as David Haye, who lost against Carl Thompson?!
Sorry mate, but I really don't think Fury is as good as some people seem to think
asdfjkl wrote:If I didn't, then how did I get those names?
I would have probably ended up with Wilder, or Joshua's opponend of yesterday, or agreed that Fury is the best.
But no, he isn't, he's just a hype with a bit of luck and most people know it. He's not a complete bum, but he's not the rank 3 of the world either, like Boxrec got him at this moment and neither is Wilder rank 4.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=194271asdfjkl wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHAaNRrbH3U&t=13m22s
Even Tyson Fury himself disagrees with you, I'm still not that impressed about Fury. I do like his talkstuff though. But I'm still quite confident he won't beat Klitschko and he will continue to box after Klitschko.
Oh I absolutely agree, it will be fun, and Briggs has a punchers chance, but that's it. It's not going anywhere near 12 rounds and it's not even remotely competitive for Haye, but I absolutely agree it'll be a fun event with all the build up etc and the show itself. I just can't see Briggs even seeing half way, never mind 12 rounds.keithmoonhangover wrote:It'll be fun while it lasts. If you think it's a sh1t match up, don't watch it.
clopixolacuphase wrote:I'm not going to go and try and find it all, but his genius contributions to the forum as a whole have already included;
posting photos of 7 foot Dutch body builders who would win world titles if they took up boxing and trained for a few months.
The assertion that the average Dutch woman could beat up most boxers below lightweight
Valuev had pain in all bones in his body. Constant pain.
Suggesting that boxing should change format and become tornament based, like kickboxing.
And of course, his unconditional love for the Cannon!
Look man, a stopped clock is right twice a day. Shannon's melon can take some dents and i thought Haye looked like dogshit this time out, wobbling about in his nappy. It's not inconceivable that Haye might not just bang him out. It'll be ten rounds anyway. Stranger things have happened.
Do you think you're better as him?
I see it going one of two ways.MarkMcBurney wrote:Oh I absolutely agree, it will be fun, and Briggs has a punchers chance, but that's it. It's not going anywhere near 12 rounds and it's not even remotely competitive for Haye, but I absolutely agree it'll be a fun event with all the build up etc and the show itself. I just can't see Briggs even seeing half way, never mind 12 rounds.keithmoonhangover wrote:It'll be fun while it lasts. If you think it's a sh1t match up, don't watch it.
MarkMcBurney wrote:Oh I absolutely agree, it will be fun, and Briggs has a punchers chance, but that's it. It's not going anywhere near 12 rounds and it's not even remotely competitive for Haye, but I absolutely agree it'll be a fun event with all the build up etc and the show itself. I just can't see Briggs even seeing half way, never mind 12 rounds.keithmoonhangover wrote:It'll be fun while it lasts. If you think it's a sh1t match up, don't watch it.
I wouldn't be surprised to see it as chief support to a Sky PPV....Joshua maybe? Could fight again in September? They'd then bill it as an 'eliminator' with the two winners meeting early 2017...wesshaw1985 wrote:Can Hayes current DAVE model support the purses these 2 men are going to require?
Or will Haye have to go with another broadcaster/platform?
Briggs wont be able to demand much. He has very limited options. Haye has the whip hand as he is the promoter and the ticket seller. If briggs asks for too much he'll be replaced.MarkMcBurney wrote:I wouldn't be surprised to see it as chief support to a Sky PPV....Joshua maybe? Could fight again in September? They'd then bill it as an 'eliminator' with the two winners meeting early 2017...wesshaw1985 wrote:Can Hayes current DAVE model support the purses these 2 men are going to require?
Or will Haye have to go with another broadcaster/platform?
From what I hear, it's already agreed.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Briggs wont be able to demand much. He has very limited options. Haye has the whip hand as he is the promoter and the ticket seller. If briggs asks for too much he'll be replaced.MarkMcBurney wrote:I wouldn't be surprised to see it as chief support to a Sky PPV....Joshua maybe? Could fight again in September? They'd then bill it as an 'eliminator' with the two winners meeting early 2017...wesshaw1985 wrote:Can Hayes current DAVE model support the purses these 2 men are going to require?
Or will Haye have to go with another broadcaster/platform?
Yes. If he has Fournier on the bill as chief support. Money buys air time.wesshaw1985 wrote:Can Hayes current DAVE model support the purses these 2 men are going to require?
Or will Haye have to go with another broadcaster/platform?