Page 2 of 2
Posted: 22 Aug 2004, 21:28
by AINTD
There was a comment here about evolution in sports, very true. Most people praise Ali, Frazier, etc. The fact is that everything has changed, it go harder, faster, stronger. Pele is considered to be on of the all times greatest footballers. But if you put his best play against a nowadays best team (consider Brazil), he would pale in comparisson. We have good memories, but things change a lot. Tyson really deserves more respect as a boxer than he has nowadays. I have also noticed that he is quite clean in his fights, can't remember of any real dirt from him (except for the bite).
Posted: 22 Aug 2004, 22:16
by zslayton
AINTD wrote:There was a comment here about evolution in sports, very true. Most people praise Ali, Frazier, etc. The fact is that everything has changed, it go harder, faster, stronger. Pele is considered to be on of the all times greatest footballers. But if you put his best play against a nowadays best team (consider Brazil), he would pale in comparisson. We have good memories, but things change a lot. Tyson really deserves more respect as a boxer than he has nowadays. I have also noticed that he is quite clean in his fights, can't remember of any real dirt from him (except for the bite).
I praise that comment. Tyson, before Cus past away and while still being trained by Rooney, was a sound technical fighter with all the skills, and he did fight clean. That is the major reason he knocked so many fighters out so easily. It was only after the chaotic lifestlye and the loss of the title that he started doing stuff in the ring that was dirty, and to this day it has only been a few times.
It's just like baseball and a homerun hitter. If you start hitting homeruns all the time you forget how to hit singles. In boxing if you knock everyone out, you start looking for the knock out and when you look for knockout it doesn't come as easily as if you set it up. Tyson used to set them, and he also used to never get hit clean because of the awesome head movement.
Tyson ability
Posted: 18 Jun 2005, 14:07
by Cojimar 1945
I woulden't be sure about Tyson necessarily beating Liston or Foreman but he certainly was a worthy successor to these guys because he was so devastating in his prime.
Re: Tyson ability
Posted: 18 Jun 2005, 15:32
by dws
Cojimar 1945 wrote:I woulden't be sure about Tyson necessarily beating Liston or Foreman but he certainly was a worthy successor to these guys because he was so devastating in his prime.
I agree,I think Tyson would be intimidated by Ali and Foreman and maybe a few others like he was against Holyfield in their second fight but against plenty of other guys he would beat them on pure ability,Tyson was faster than hell and had big power in both hands plus he could take a real good punch in his prime,he'd beat a lot of good fighters,just not the elite(Ali,Foreman,Holmes)in my opinion,no shame in that.