Autobarn wrote:Glad he will remain current.
Remain current, he's a world champion who has been defending his title for the last 2 years against complete unknown no hopers, he is a laughing stock right now, what are you on about man?
Autobarn wrote:Glad he will remain current.
Shut up you sad tit of a manHorse wrote:Why has it taken so long to arrange this unexceptional fight?
And why is it three months away?
He'll probably not fight again before the end of the year either.
Another wasted year for Brook.
No.Stuarty30 wrote:Shut up you sad tit of a man
Fair enoughHorse wrote:No.Stuarty30 wrote:Shut up you sad tit of a man
I agree its a wasted year for Brook so what if he picks up the WBO belt, he will have taken from a paper champion.Stuarty30 wrote:Shut up you sad tit of a manHorse wrote:Why has it taken so long to arrange this unexceptional fight?
And why is it three months away?
He'll probably not fight again before the end of the year either.
Another wasted year for Brook.
Harsh. He can't help being avoided can he? He was stabbed and had a bad injury to contend with. Two of his three defences were mandatory. I want to see him in with a batter class of opponent but to say he's holding the title hostage is very harsh.ALI wrote:I agree its a wasted year for Brook so what if he picks up the WBO belt, he will have taken from a paper champion.Stuarty30 wrote:Shut up you sad tit of a manHorse wrote:Why has it taken so long to arrange this unexceptional fight?
And why is it three months away?
He'll probably not fight again before the end of the year either.
Another wasted year for Brook.
The man is at his peak, if he is only fighting twice a year at least one of those fights has to be very significant.
He's holding that title under lock and key, its embarrassing!
Stuarty30 wrote:Fair enoughHorse wrote:No.Stuarty30 wrote:Shut up you sad tit of a man
'horse is right'SNG wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Fair enoughHorse wrote:No.![]()
To be fair, horse is right. It's always the next fight with Brook, and has been for four years. This is his second best fight.
Put forward your evidence that shows he is being avoided. IMO your deluded.Stuarty30 wrote:Harsh. He can't help being avoided can he? He was stabbed and had a bad injury to contend with. Two of his three defences were mandatory. I want to see him in with a batter class of opponent but to say he's holding the title hostage is very harsh.ALI wrote:I agree its a wasted year for Brook so what if he picks up the WBO belt, he will have taken from a paper champion.Stuarty30 wrote:
Shut up you sad tit of a man
The man is at his peak, if he is only fighting twice a year at least one of those fights has to be very significant.
He's holding that title under lock and key, its embarrassing!
He should be fighting better guys. I am anything but deluded mate. You're being harsh! No fight is easy. We're all fighting men on here aren't we? Fights are never straight forward or easy....ALI wrote:Put forward your evidence that shows he is being avoided. IMO your deluded.Stuarty30 wrote:Harsh. He can't help being avoided can he? He was stabbed and had a bad injury to contend with. Two of his three defences were mandatory. I want to see him in with a batter class of opponent but to say he's holding the title hostage is very harsh.ALI wrote:
I agree its a wasted year for Brook so what if he picks up the WBO belt, he will have taken from a paper champion.
The man is at his peak, if he is only fighting twice a year at least one of those fights has to be very significant.
He's holding that title under lock and key, its embarrassing!
He was stabbed, but he's back fighting. Are you saying he deserves easy fights because of what happened to his leg???
Nothing at all harsh about what i'm saying, he has a world title, he should be defending it against the best contenders out there.
Laughing stock?ALI wrote:Autobarn wrote:Glad he will remain current.![]()
Remain current, he's a world champion who has been defending his title for the last 2 years against complete unknown no hopers, he is a laughing stock right now, what are you on about man?
John Fury, is that you?!Stuarty30 wrote:He should be fighting better guys. I am anything but deluded mate. You're being harsh! No fight is easy. We're all fighting men on here aren't we? Fights are never straight forward or easy....ALI wrote:Put forward your evidence that shows he is being avoided. IMO your deluded.Stuarty30 wrote:
Harsh. He can't help being avoided can he? He was stabbed and had a bad injury to contend with. Two of his three defences were mandatory. I want to see him in with a batter class of opponent but to say he's holding the title hostage is very harsh.
He was stabbed, but he's back fighting. Are you saying he deserves easy fights because of what happened to his leg???
Nothing at all harsh about what i'm saying, he has a world title, he should be defending it against the best contenders out there.
I don't get that impression from him.mickey1975 wrote:Brook isn't dodging anyone. He is more frustrated than anyone by what's gone on. He would fight them all.
Spot on. Mayweather has commented that none of the top guys will fight Brook.mickey1975 wrote:Brook isn't dodging anyone. He is more frustrated than anyone by what's gone on. He would fight them all.
Erroll Spence was willing to fight him now.BigDoofus wrote:Spot on. Mayweather has commented that none of the top guys will fight Brook.mickey1975 wrote:Brook isn't dodging anyone. He is more frustrated than anyone by what's gone on. He would fight them all.
Hmm.mickey1975 wrote:Brook isn't dodging anyone. He is more frustrated than anyone by what's gone on. He would fight them all.
Yeah, but it ain't that easy to make a big fight, especially when the opponent is in a different country.SNG wrote:To be fair, horse is right. It's always the next fight with Brook, and has been for four years. This is his second best fight.
Brook probably wants to fight5 Erroll Spence as well. It doesn't mean the fight will automatically happen. Spence is an unknown in this country and Brook only had one fight there. It would take a lot of money to get either guy over to the other side of the Atlantic.lefty wrote:Erroll Spence was willing to fight him now.BigDoofus wrote:Spot on. Mayweather has commented that none of the top guys will fight Brook.mickey1975 wrote:Brook isn't dodging anyone. He is more frustrated than anyone by what's gone on. He would fight them all.
Most fighters who Brook fights though are unknown to the majority of fans in this country unless they're hardcore fans. Brook could either head over to the states to fight one of the top guys or Hearn should be willing to pay the money needed to bring them over.keithmoonhangover wrote:Brook probably wants to fight5 Erroll Spence as well. It doesn't mean the fight will automatically happen. Spence is an unknown in this country and Brook only had one fight there. It would take a lot of money to get either guy over to the other side of the Atlantic.lefty wrote:Erroll Spence was willing to fight him now.BigDoofus wrote:
Spot on. Mayweather has commented that none of the top guys will fight Brook.
He should be more vocal about it then in the media and say he's not happy with the fights Hearns getting him. That or get a deal with Haymon if he can.mickey1975 wrote:I'm not guessing here. It's straight from Brooks mouth, away from tv. A friend is very close to him and swears it does Brooks head in. He is itching for the big names.
It depends how much they ask for mate. It's got to make financial sense. Unless it's a really big name, it's not going to make a huge amount of money, so it won't be financially viable to do. Brook could go to the States, but it's pretty much nailed on that Hearn won't be promoting it, soooo, it boils down to what Brook is offered from the other side of the pond.lefty wrote:Most fighters who Brook fights though are unknown to the majority of fans in this country unless they're hardcore fans. Brook could either head over to the states to fight one of the top guys or Hearn should be willing to pay the money needed to bring them over.keithmoonhangover wrote:Brook probably wants to fight5 Erroll Spence as well. It doesn't mean the fight will automatically happen. Spence is an unknown in this country and Brook only had one fight there. It would take a lot of money to get either guy over to the other side of the Atlantic.lefty wrote: Erroll Spence was willing to fight him now.
lefty wrote:He should be more vocal about it then in the media and say he's not happy with the fights Hearns getting him. That or get a deal with Haymon if he can.mickey1975 wrote:I'm not guessing here. It's straight from Brooks mouth, away from tv. A friend is very close to him and swears it does Brooks head in. He is itching for the big names.