Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by Controversial »

I wouldn't say terrible but definitely being overhyped, I'm still waiting to see what happens when he is really caught with a big punch from a big puncher. On the plus side he has all the physical tools, he appears to love to keep in shape and has confidence (which might change if he losses). I would have rather he had a few more learning fights before taking the title shot as he is still work in progress.
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by dbf »

All offense and is getting used to having his own way. Fury boxes him to a points win right now. Haye is an interesting one
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by Andrew »

After his throws a massive right hand he swings it back in a very weird motion.Its the sort of shot he throws and finished an opponent but he missed it a fair few times Saturday night.


Personally can't say terrible only because the standard of current heavyweights is poor.

But if Breazeale made him miss like he did in the early rounds Tyson Fury could really embarrass him that's if he ever fights again.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by crusader »

Naandrew wrote:After his throws a massive right hand he swings it back in a very weird motion.
I've noticed that too
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by whiskey »

I'm not going to sh*t on the guy, but there is certainly a lot to learn.

He's constantly drawing a crucifix with his punches - left, right, up and down - repeat.

Right now he's got to pull up those weak areas to match that speed and punching power, or he will out-boxed or out-hustled.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by asdfjkl »

If you really think that, call me one heavyweight in the entire history who's supposed to have a chance against him. I can't name any.
foxdog1923
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1105
Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by foxdog1923 »

asdfjkl wrote:If you really think that, call me one heavyweight in the entire history who's supposed to have a chance against him. I can't name any.
All the ones calling him out including Wlad whos sparred him and now wants him next after Fury. Joshua is the boxer NO ONE is ducking lol.
section4
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 21
Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 11:31

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by section4 »

he is about as good as frank bruno was when he fought bonecrusher
and if he fought someone like bone crusher now he would get knocked out
he hit breazeale with numerous clean punches and couldnt budge him
and thats without breazeale hitting him atall
when he starts getting hit back on a regular basis
we will see what he is made of, if whyte can rock him it not good
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

TheLeprechaun wrote:Just rewatched his fight vs Erislandy Savon.

Genuinely should go down as one of the biggest robberies at an Olympic event. Joshua was comprehensively outboxed from start to finish
Yeah I agree. I thought Joshua lost the final as well, although that was definitely a close fight which could have gone either way. But Savon beat him comfortably imo.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by stevedoc »

section4 wrote:he is about as good as frank bruno was when he fought bonecrusher
and if he fought someone like bone crusher now he would get knocked out
he hit breazeale with numerous clean punches and couldnt budge him
and thats without breazeale hitting him atall
when he starts getting hit back on a regular basis
we will see what he is made of, if whyte can rock him it not good
i'm a bit worried about AJ's power he obviously hits hard but he stops people rather than KOs them i think like bruno he might get found out at top level frank never floored anyone at world class will AJ be the same
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by J »

TheLeprechaun wrote:I am always surprised when I watch him because I just don't get what everyone else sees. He appears to be so basic and rudimentary. Extremely one dimensional. He looks very robotic, even just the way he walks looks very robotic. He's the type of fighting style that i'd expect to get thoroughly outboxed by a "slick" fighter.

I think he gets by on having world class power and his size, which gives him a shot against any heavyweight because it will only take one punch.

He really looks poor to me but the entire division is quite bad at the moment.

He reminds me of Kelly Pavlik. Limited but good enough to rule his division for a period of time. Lost every round vs a slick mover in Hopkins though.

yeah not good to be robotic as a heavyweight is it...cant think of any successful Heavies who have been labeled Robotic....errrr hang on :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2177
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by tony1234 »

section4 wrote:he is about as good as frank bruno was when he fought bonecrusher
and if he fought someone like bone crusher now he would get knocked out
he hit breazeale with numerous clean punches and couldnt budge him
and thats without breazeale hitting him atall
when he starts getting hit back on a regular basis
we will see what he is made of, if whyte can rock him it not good
Said that on Saturday, wait till he has his bone crusher Smith type fight and then we'll see, Whyte was the Jumbo Cummings fight
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by reggaereggae »

tony1234 wrote:
section4 wrote:he is about as good as frank bruno was when he fought bonecrusher
and if he fought someone like bone crusher now he would get knocked out
he hit breazeale with numerous clean punches and couldnt budge him
and thats without breazeale hitting him atall
when he starts getting hit back on a regular basis
we will see what he is made of, if whyte can rock him it not good
Said that on Saturday, wait till he has his bone crusher Smith type fight and then we'll see, Whyte was the Jumbo Cummings fight
Good points. Joshua reminds me very much of Bruno, though I consider him slightly better, and faster.

And yes he is an intermediate (novice is too strong) - but he has only he one vaguely hard fight. Against a one armed Dillian Whyte who is at this stage British level. Breazeale showed great heart but had very little offensive skills. When he shadow boxed he looked awful and even missed the pads when warming up.

Joshua does seem quite easy to catch with a jab. But he hasn't yet faced any fighter within a half decent jab. Even Gary Cornish out jabbed him.
Stevieb8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by Stevieb8006 »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote:Just rewatched his fight vs Erislandy Savon.

Genuinely should go down as one of the biggest robberies at an Olympic event. Joshua was comprehensively outboxed from start to finish
Yeah I agree. I thought Joshua lost the final as well, although that was definitely a close fight which could have gone either way. But Savon beat him comfortably imo.
I agree.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

stevedoc wrote:
section4 wrote:he is about as good as frank bruno was when he fought bonecrusher
and if he fought someone like bone crusher now he would get knocked out
he hit breazeale with numerous clean punches and couldnt budge him
and thats without breazeale hitting him atall
when he starts getting hit back on a regular basis
we will see what he is made of, if whyte can rock him it not good
i'm a bit worried about AJ's power he obviously hits hard but he stops people rather than KOs them i think like bruno he might get found out at top level frank never floored anyone at world class will AJ be the same
So, in order to be considered a puncher, you have to leave guys face down every fight. Right. :roll:

Even by your own definition you fail, Joshua has poleaxed most of the guys on his record. Who exactly has managed to avoid hitting the canvas or taking a count against him by the end of the fight? Oh yeah, noone.

You can call him robotic or anything else, but saying he's not a legit puncher is ridiculous in the extreme.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by TheCobra »

Certainly not terrible. But definitely overhyped. But whatever, he's making his money and so is Eddie and the casuals have bought into it. I can't blame Joshua or Hearn for that.

He hasn't been tested yet, I think he beats Wilder but not Wlad, Fury or Haye right now.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Anyone else think joshua is terrible?

Post by stevedoc »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
stevedoc wrote:
section4 wrote:he is about as good as frank bruno was when he fought bonecrusher
and if he fought someone like bone crusher now he would get knocked out
he hit breazeale with numerous clean punches and couldnt budge him
and thats without breazeale hitting him atall
when he starts getting hit back on a regular basis
we will see what he is made of, if whyte can rock him it not good
i'm a bit worried about AJ's power he obviously hits hard but he stops people rather than KOs them i think like bruno he might get found out at top level frank never floored anyone at world class will AJ be the same
So, in order to be considered a puncher, you have to leave guys face down every fight. Right. :roll:

Even by your own definition you fail, Joshua has poleaxed most of the guys on his record. Who exactly has managed to avoid hitting the canvas or taking a count against him by the end of the fight? Oh yeah, noone.

You can call him robotic or anything else, but saying he's not a legit puncher is ridiculous in the extreme.

what wrong with KO'ing fighters all the big punchers did foreman, louis ,lewis and wlad all sparked out fighters joshua doesn't and he hasn't fought anyone in the top 10 yet ..... Bruno was doing the exact same thing till bonecrusher smith , you may disagree which you're entitled to but come across like a teenage girl arguing about justin bieber .
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47076
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by gilgamesh »

TheLeprechaun wrote:I am always surprised when I watch him because I just don't get what everyone else sees. He appears to be so basic and rudimentary. Extremely one dimensional. He looks very robotic, even just the way he walks looks very robotic. He's the type of fighting style that i'd expect to get thoroughly outboxed by a "slick" fighter.

I think he gets by on having world class power and his size, which gives him a shot against any heavyweight because it will only take one punch.

He really looks poor to me but the entire division is quite bad at the moment.

He reminds me of Kelly Pavlik. Limited but good enough to rule his division for a period of time. Lost every round vs a slick mover in Hopkins though.
Since Chris Byrd went away I don't recall seeing any slick heavyweights around to contend with.
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by Dixonian »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
stevedoc wrote:
section4 wrote:he is about as good as frank bruno was when he fought bonecrusher
and if he fought someone like bone crusher now he would get knocked out
he hit breazeale with numerous clean punches and couldnt budge him
and thats without breazeale hitting him atall
when he starts getting hit back on a regular basis
we will see what he is made of, if whyte can rock him it not good
i'm a bit worried about AJ's power he obviously hits hard but he stops people rather than KOs them i think like bruno he might get found out at top level frank never floored anyone at world class will AJ be the same
So, in order to be considered a puncher, you have to leave guys face down every fight. Right. :roll:

Even by your own definition you fail, Joshua has poleaxed most of the guys on his record. Who exactly has managed to avoid hitting the canvas or taking a count against him by the end of the fight? Oh yeah, noone.

You can call him robotic or anything else, but saying he's not a legit puncher is ridiculous in the extreme.
Yep you do wonder about people's eyesight sometimes!!
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by stevedoc »

Dixonian wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
stevedoc wrote:
i'm a bit worried about AJ's power he obviously hits hard but he stops people rather than KOs them i think like bruno he might get found out at top level frank never floored anyone at world class will AJ be the same
So, in order to be considered a puncher, you have to leave guys face down every fight. Right. :roll:

Even by your own definition you fail, Joshua has poleaxed most of the guys on his record. Who exactly has managed to avoid hitting the canvas or taking a count against him by the end of the fight? Oh yeah, noone.

You can call him robotic or anything else, but saying he's not a legit puncher is ridiculous in the extreme.
Yep you do wonder about people's eyesight sometimes!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0uvGe0AhNI


here's AJ KO reel seems like a lot of stoppages to me ...you should check your own eyesight sonny jim
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Anyone else think joshua is terrible?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

stevedoc wrote:
what wrong with KO'ing fighters all the big punchers did foreman, louis ,lewis and wlad all sparked out fighters joshua doesn't and he hasn't fought anyone in the top 10 yet ..... Bruno was doing the exact same thing till bonecrusher smith , you may disagree which you're entitled to but come across like a teenage girl arguing about justin bieber .
Have you actually seen Joshua fight? If he didn't spark out guys like Whyte, Love, Avila, Skelton, Gavern, what did he do to them exactly? :o

Or maybe you just think along the lines of the classic armchair fan 'Well, huh, but he wasn't...unconscious' Which is a ridiculous way to think about power as most refs will stop it before getting to that stage, particularly if a fighter has been decked already.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

The idea Joshua lacks power, is one of the most laughable things I've ever read.

Every time he lands flush with a good hard shot, he hurts his opponents.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

gilgamesh wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote:I am always surprised when I watch him because I just don't get what everyone else sees. He appears to be so basic and rudimentary. Extremely one dimensional. He looks very robotic, even just the way he walks looks very robotic. He's the type of fighting style that i'd expect to get thoroughly outboxed by a "slick" fighter.

I think he gets by on having world class power and his size, which gives him a shot against any heavyweight because it will only take one punch.

He really looks poor to me but the entire division is quite bad at the moment.

He reminds me of Kelly Pavlik. Limited but good enough to rule his division for a period of time. Lost every round vs a slick mover in Hopkins though.
Since Chris Byrd went away I don't recall seeing any slick heavyweights around to contend with.
Ortiz could well have too many smarts for Joshua, if that fight gets made before father time catches up with Ortiz. Which it won't.

I would love to see it though. As it stands, if he has a chin, I think Ortiz is the only guy out there who can deal with Joshua.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote:I am always surprised when I watch him because I just don't get what everyone else sees. He appears to be so basic and rudimentary. Extremely one dimensional. He looks very robotic, even just the way he walks looks very robotic. He's the type of fighting style that i'd expect to get thoroughly outboxed by a "slick" fighter.

I think he gets by on having world class power and his size, which gives him a shot against any heavyweight because it will only take one punch.

He really looks poor to me but the entire division is quite bad at the moment.

He reminds me of Kelly Pavlik. Limited but good enough to rule his division for a period of time. Lost every round vs a slick mover in Hopkins though.
Since Chris Byrd went away I don't recall seeing any slick heavyweights around to contend with.
Ortiz could well have too many smarts for Joshua, if that fight gets made before father time catches up with Ortiz. Which it won't.

I would love to see it though. As it stands I think Ortiz is the only guy out there who can deal with Joshua.
Yeah, it's a shame Ortiz is so old, he looks great. Kind of like a harder punching bigger Witherspoon.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Anyone else think Joshua is terrible?

Post by asdfjkl »

foxdog1923 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:If you really think that, call me one heavyweight in the entire history who's supposed to have a chance against him. I can't name any.
All the ones calling him out including Wlad whos sparred him and now wants him next after Fury. Joshua is the boxer NO ONE is ducking lol.
Yea and 2²=4

What on earth does your comment have to do with my comment?
Post Reply