BoxRec

BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:- Nobody can find a greater p4p, high end technical fight than Pryor vs Arguello.

the doubts around the hawk ruin
this one forever for me.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Whitaker/Mcgirt

cool. thnx.

man wrote:

BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:- Nobody can find a greater p4p, high end technical fight than Pryor vs Arguello.

the doubts around the hawk ruin
this one forever for me.

It was not a "technical fight" at all anyway.
Witherspoon-Holmes
Charles-Walcott fights

I suppose it depends what you define by "technical".

Lewis gave Tyson a technical beating, that is fact. He did everything right. He could not of done anything more technical.

Everything was measured and planned. He took him into "deep water, and drowned him".

You may be under the mistaken belief that my knowledge only goes back to this fight in 2002, but you will be incorrect for believing that my friend.

Not sure whom you're talking to but a technical fight would include both boxers more than one guy overcoming initial fear to beat up a punching bag. Lennox/holyfield 2 is more apt. Though Lennox didn't exactly get the best of that.

Lomachenko vs Russell was a technically brilliant fight.

Roberto Duran did one of the best technical boxing jobs I've EVER seen on DeJesus in their 3rd fight.. DeJesus had a hard camp and looked ready at the weigh-in.. DeJesus was cool, relaxed, and certainly wasn't intimidated.. Duran smiled at him almost friendly like.. Duran had 63 fights and was a master craftsman for that particular fight if he ever was... Duran controlled the pace beautifully. He controlled DeJesus with his jab and started to punish him severely... For that fight Duran was the best lightweight ever.

Kalan wrote:Roberto Duran did one of the best technical boxing jobs I've EVER seen on DeJesus in their 3rd fight.. DeJesus had a hard camp and looked ready at the weigh-in.. DeJesus was cool, relaxed, and certainly wasn't intimidated.. Duran smiled at him almost friendly like.. Duran had 63 fights and was a master craftsman for that particular fight if he ever was... Duran controlled the pace beautifully. He controlled DeJesus with his jab and started to punish him severely... For that fight Duran was the best lightweight ever.

You gave me goose bumps. One of the few things in boxing topics that I totally agree with you.

The Hands of Stone in that Saturday afternoon in Las Vegas Caesar's Palace, was as complete fighting machine as he wanted to be. He was a class above Esteban DeJesus in that rubber match. DeJesus was a fantastic fighter, but, he was fighting a phenomenon. This was one of the great Roberto Duran's greatest performances. No lightweight in history beats him that day.

I just watched Toney vs McCallum 1 and that maybe one of the most technical great fights i've ever seen.

rob h wrote:I suppose it depends what you define by "technical".

Lewis gave Tyson a technical beating, that is fact.

but giving someone a technical beating
is not the same as a technically great fight,
which requires give and take on a technical
level.

the one fighter technically dominating his
opponent that stands out until the end of
time is ali - williams.

lewis - tyson was the sad story of a shot
fighter with a big name getting a much needed
last payday. nothing beautiful in this one and
someone should have had mercy with mike
long before the inevitable final hand.

Kalan wrote:Roberto Duran did one of the best technical boxing jobs I've EVER seen on DeJesus in their 3rd fight.. DeJesus had a hard camp and looked ready at the weigh-in.. DeJesus was cool, relaxed, and certainly wasn't intimidated.. Duran smiled at him almost friendly like.. Duran had 63 fights and was a master craftsman for that particular fight if he ever was... Duran controlled the pace beautifully. He controlled DeJesus with his jab and started to punish him severely... For that fight Duran was the best lightweight ever.

thnx for this one!

man wrote:

elmersalsa wrote:Leonard vs Hearns I

agreed. plus a tactical masterpiece.

Great technical fight.

Remember Dundee saying he couldn't believe that Hearns was able to outbox Ray hurt going backwards.
He also said if Tommy Hearns had good balance after taking a punch he'd be the best fighter of all time.

DrunkenBoxer wrote:I just watched Toney vs McCallum 1 and that maybe one of the most technical great fights i've ever seen.

A battle of masters. The last great technical fight that I have ever seen

Whitaker Chavez
Whitaker R Mayweather

Muhammad Ali v Bob Foster.

It was a battle of the jabs & Foster is the only man to cut Ali in his career.

PredatorHayds wrote:

man wrote:

elmersalsa wrote:Leonard vs Hearns I

agreed. plus a tactical masterpiece.

Great technical fight.

Remember Dundee saying he couldn't believe that Hearns was able to outbox Ray hurt going backwards.
He also said if Tommy Hearns had good balance after taking a punch he'd be the best fighter of all time.

Not for me... You could sit on Hearns' jab and rip him... It was harder to hit Sanchez, Jofre, Pep, Tunney, Mayweather, and the greatest boxers. They were slicker with their feints and changed their shots up more to keep you guessing. Hearns would load a punch up and you could nail him clean.

the charles/maxim fights were good examples. charles was the harder puncher and was faster, but maxim had a great chin and was a very good defensive boxer, so he had ezzard working throughout.

i can't think of a good technical opponent off hand , but any good boxer against billy graham would have produced a fine technical fight. graham against tippy larkin was voted by the sportswriters as the best pure boxing match of the year. that's one i'd love to be able to see, but my time machine isn't perfected yet.

Griffith/Rodriguez

Charles was 5-0 against Maxim I believe... 3-0 against Archie Moore...2-0 against Charley Burley... 2-0 against Joe Walcott before he started falling off the rails... Archie Moore had over 50 fights, but was floored 4 times by Charlie Burley in a Welterweight fight Burley took on 5 hours notice.

It would be great to see some of those fights... Weirdly enough, nobody seems to have them except the Charles-Walcott fights

Toney vs McCallum I
Leonard vs Hagler
Leonard vs Hearns I
Arbachakov vs Sasakul I
Hagler vs Duran
Toney vs Nunn