Page 2 of 2

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 06:33
by ILikeBeer
I doubt it somehow.

Hearn was just on about Joshua fighting Hughie Fury. Hughie Fury stepping out, and David Haye stepping in is a bit of a Quantum Leap.

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 06:59
by asdfjkl
Nightmare Roy wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: Even AJ loses some respect from me for accepting this fight, it's a waste of time imo.
Get out! Its a great fight Haye is miles more dangerous than anyone AJ has fought. Get past Haye and then unify.
:doh: A cruiserweight with a bunch of extra fat on his body isn't a dangerous boxer, simple as that. Let Haye fight Briggs and after that he might move on. Atm he hasn't proven to be any better as Briggs, Breazeale, or name them. Whyte would probably KO him by the first succesful hit.

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 07:08
by ILikeBeer
asdfjkl wrote: :doh: A cruiserweight with a bunch of extra fat on his body isn't a dangerous boxer, simple as that. Let Haye fight Briggs and after that he might move on. Atm he hasn't proven to be any better as Briggs, Breazeale, or name them. Whyte would probably KO him by the first succesful hit.
:doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh:

You can question Haye's personality all you like, but to say the he isn't better than Shannon Briggs is an absurd statement. Or Breazeale.

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 07:12
by jamesmcdonnell
Rob3_142 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Haye will fight like AJ is carrying nitroglycerine in his protector. He's never won against a big punching heavyweight who is bigger than him.
This. Haye has a fabulous record of knocking underwhelming opposition into next Wednesday, but when has Haye really beaten anyone over 12 rounds that is a big puncher and bigger than him?

His most impressive wins were against Ruiz and Chisora, who were both smaller than him. Currently all the heavyweight belt holders are all much much taller than Haye, which suggests he'd struggle to get hands on any belt.

Haye should just fight Briggs, and move up the rankings. There might be a big summer fight with Joshua on, but I don't fancy him winning. thinking either a Joshua blowout, or for Joshua to keep him off for 12 rounds and win on points.
Haye's only real chance with Joshua is to set a trap and catch him coming in, if Joshua keeps it long, Haye's feet won't be quick enough to get into range, just as he failed to do against Klitschko. I think the difference is, Joshua will want to finish it, rather than settle for a dull 12 round borefest.

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 07:14
by ILikeBeer
Rob3_142 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Haye will fight like AJ is carrying nitroglycerine in his protector. He's never won against a big punching heavyweight who is bigger than him.
This. Haye has a fabulous record of knocking underwhelming opposition into next Wednesday, but when has Haye really beaten anyone over 12 rounds that is a big puncher and bigger than him?
What definition of the word 'small' are you using, where Valuev can be claimed to be smaller than Haye?

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 07:18
by samwbr
The taller, stronger, younger, bigger hitting hungrier man wins this. If it happens. It's an obvious cash out for Haye, the only reason he came back, he isn't looking at a long career from here on in.

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 07:19
by jamesmcdonnell
ILikeBeer wrote:
Rob3_142 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Haye will fight like AJ is carrying nitroglycerine in his protector. He's never won against a big punching heavyweight who is bigger than him.
This. Haye has a fabulous record of knocking underwhelming opposition into next Wednesday, but when has Haye really beaten anyone over 12 rounds that is a big puncher and bigger than him?
What definition of the word 'small' are you using, where Valuev can be claimed to be smaller than Haye?
Valuev was also dogshit, and there was barely a shot landed in the round. That fight had almost nothing landed.

Wlad beat Haye with ease, using height and reach advantages, because unlike Valuev he wasn't as slow as shit through a funnel.

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 07:20
by jamesmcdonnell
samwbr wrote:The taller, stronger, younger, bigger hitting hungrier man wins this. If it happens. It's an obvious cash out for Haye, the only reason he came back, he isn't looking at a long career from here on in.
I agree, Haye saw an opportunity to make a last big payday. I doubt he imagines himself he is likely to win against Joshua, but figures he's got a chance, and will earn a fortune doing so.

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 08:29
by J
jamesmcdonnell wrote:[
Wlad beat Haye with ease, using height and reach advantages, because unlike Valuev he wasn't as slow as poo through a funnel.

this depends on the circumstances and what you have been eating and drinking
HMMMM not been out with me a for bit Jimmy have ya? :OhYes: :OhYes: :OhYes:

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 08:40
by jamesmcdonnell
No.....thank fornicate!! You back yet?

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 09:15
by J
sep 12th fella.

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 09:21
by jamesmcdonnell
I'll make sure I've emigrated by then then. :TU: :wave:

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 11:13
by Rob3_142
ILikeBeer wrote:
Rob3_142 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Haye will fight like AJ is carrying nitroglycerine in his protector. He's never won against a big punching heavyweight who is bigger than him.
This. Haye has a fabulous record of knocking underwhelming opposition into next Wednesday, but when has Haye really beaten anyone over 12 rounds that is a big puncher and bigger than him?
What definition of the word 'small' are you using, where Valuev can be claimed to be smaller than Haye?
I'm sorry I was talking about boxers, not sure Valuev qualifies. Valuev challenges Martin for worst HW champ ever...

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 12:23
by Autobarn
What happened to Haye v Briggs?

Re: Aj v hayemaker

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 12:55
by asdfjkl
ILikeBeer wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: :doh: A cruiserweight with a bunch of extra fat on his body isn't a dangerous boxer, simple as that. Let Haye fight Briggs and after that he might move on. Atm he hasn't proven to be any better as Briggs, Breazeale, or name them. Whyte would probably KO him by the first succesful hit.
:doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh:

You can question Haye's personality all you like, but to say the he isn't better than Shannon Briggs is an absurd statement. Or Breazeale.
He hasn't proven it, that's what I'm saying, you can't fight rank 150+ ish Mark de Mori and rank 50 ish Gjergjaj and then ignore the rank 38 Shannon Briggs? Especially not if you promised it. There are so many people who bought the ticket of last fight because of Shannon Briggs and now Haye is walking away with that money? Briggs hasn't been proven wrong since he got injured.

That's like Arreola not giving up out of himself after Wilder couldn't continue any more and then nobody from the top 50 ever fighting Wilder ever again? What else can Briggs do as winning against whoever is in front of him if every high ranked person is too scared to fight him? Ortiz had the same problem for a very very long time and now he turns out to be good.