BoxRec

Would be a very exciting matchup and those playing it down would be among the first queuing up to watch.

Not sure why people feel so threatened by Wilder? He is big guy who is good at knocking people out. Live with it.

bnovelist wrote:Wilder vs Joshua MegaFight

Enlightened-One wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:Wilder vs Joshua MegaFight

You know, making up quotes doesn't count, right?

Rob3_142 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

bnovelist wrote:Wilder vs Joshua MegaFight

You know, making up quotes doesn't count, right?

I really do apologise for that. It was a typo. I meant to copy/paste bnovelist’s name in my quote (as he created the thread) but somehow copied yours instead (as you responded first).

Once again, I’m sorry for my mistake.

Enlightened-One wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

You know, making up quotes doesn't count, right?

I really do apologise for that. It was a typo. I meant to copy/paste bnovelist’s name in my quote (as he created the thread) but somehow copied yours instead (as you responded first).

Once again, I’m sorry for my mistake.

Haha - no worries. apology accepted.

jbizzle20 wrote:Wilder has done nothing to suggest he is anything more than another Liston. A big gorilla with little technique. Joshua would dissect him, badly. This won't happen anyway because Haymon won't allow it.

What ! You think Liston had no skills. Have you watched, fought or studied boxing ever ? That is a really uninformed statement.

Battle of the dodgy chins.

I say wilder

All depends, if the fight got made in the next say 6-8 months ud have to favour Wilder as he's the more experience and fought slightly better opposition but if the fight was made in a year and a half time id personally favour Joshua, he's technically a better boxer then Wilder and Wilder is so open at times to be countered with his looping shots

adambb22 wrote:All depends, if the fight got made in the next say 6-8 months ud have to favour Wilder as he's the more experience and fought slightly better opposition but if the fight was made in a year and a half time id personally favour Joshua, he's technically a better boxer then Wilder and Wilder is so open at times to be countered with his looping shots

Are you sure about that? Since I'm not so sure about that at all.

Yeah look when Wilder fight, he's always open, most can't capitalise on it cos there too small but AJ isn't

Oiky wrote:Battle of the dodgy chins.

I say wilder

And Joshua has a dodgy chin...how exactly?

Oiky wrote:Battle of the dodgy chins.

I say wilder

Where is there evidence that either have dodgy chins? Neither have been dropped in their pro career.

For me has to be AJ. For me he has the stronger jab and right hand is the best finisher as well. Wilder can get a bet excited when he has his opponent in Queer Street.

Rob3_142 wrote:

Oiky wrote:Battle of the dodgy chins.

I say wilder

Where is there evidence that either have dodgy chins? Neither have been dropped in their pro career.

Wilder has in fact, against a really small, uncredebly fat midget in the beginning of his pro carreer. The dwarf was like 400 pounds or so.

Rob3_142 wrote:

Oiky wrote:Battle of the dodgy chins.

I say wilder

Where is there evidence that either have dodgy chins? Neither have been dropped in their pro career.

Wilder was dropped by Harold Sconiers

crusader wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

Oiky wrote:Battle of the dodgy chins.

I say wilder

Where is there evidence that either have dodgy chins? Neither have been dropped in their pro career.

Wilder was dropped by Harold Sconiers

Damn, I meant to add '(as far as I am aware)' at the end. I didn't know Wilder had been dropped, but I still don't think it qualifies as a 'dodgy chin'. Otherwise you could say the exact same thing about Fury or Breazeale...