BoxRec

Manchester Arena, Joshua v Price, Quiggmire as chief support seems pretty likely I think. Throw in a smattering of Smiths and charge everyone £16.99 to watch it on telly.

Stuffs wrote:Manchester Arena, Joshua v Price, Quiggmire as chief support seems pretty likely I think. Throw in a smattering of Smiths and charge everyone £16.99 to watch it on telly.

Yeah, if it's Price it makes sense.

No way I'll pay PPV to see that though, it'll probably last a round.

Stuffs wrote:a smattering of Smiths

Is that the official name for them? Like a romp of otters, flange of baboons or a mob of kangeroos?

Taansend wrote:

Stuffs wrote:a smattering of Smiths

Is that the official name for them? Like a romp of otters, flange of baboons or a mob of kangeroos?

It is actually called a flange of baboons, I just had to check. Is it a minge of marmosets?

BitPlayer wrote:Isn't Stivern fighting Povetkin?

I don't think that fight has been made. It's been mandated by the WBC for the interim title but if you were Stiverne would you fight Povetkin (which a tough fight) for an interim title and probably not much money or would you fight Joshua for the full title and a decent payday?

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Taansend wrote:

Stuffs wrote:a smattering of Smiths

Is that the official name for them? Like a romp of otters, flange of baboons or a mob of kangeroos?

It is actually called a flange of baboons, I just had to check. Is it a minge of marmosets?

A fanny of ferrets

A pudendum of puffins

AJ vs Price is the new Haye vs A Force.

I like Price, im glad he'll get a good pay day to retire on, after he has spread around like margarine, unfortunately.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Stuffs wrote:Manchester Arena, Joshua v Price, Quiggmire as chief support seems pretty likely I think. Throw in a smattering of Smiths and charge everyone £16.99 to watch it on telly.

Yeah, if it's Price it makes sense.

No way I'll pay PPV to see that though, it'll probably last a round.

As soon as it was confirmed not to be at the O2, my immediate thought was Price in Liverpool (although the MEN would also make sense)

lefty wrote:if you were Stiverne would you fight Povetkin?

Stiverne would fight anyone. He is not getting any fights. Noone wants to work with Don King. Including BTW Ryabinsky who said previously that he will never deal with King again. Which means Stiverne is available.

Pulev would be perfect but I suspect its another useless American.

wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/anthony-josh ... -9--107990

Hmmm Joshua has a deadline to fight Parker of 19 January, makes me think that Joshua won't be lining up a MASSIVE fight in November. Perhaps knock over one of the US hopefuls in the States (Miller, Molina, Ruiz) giving him plenty of time to get prepped for Parker early in 2017.

Joseph Parker vs David Price on the undercard of Anthony Joshua's November 26th fight?

That's what Eddie Hearn would like to see.

Like a Boss wrote:Joseph Parker vs David Price on the undercard of Anthony Joshua's November 26th fight?

That's what Eddie Hearn would like to see.

Me too

Taansend wrote:

Like a Boss wrote:Joseph Parker vs David Price on the undercard of Anthony Joshua's November 26th fight?

That's what Eddie Hearn would like to see.

Me too

Yeah I'd be up for that

Like a Boss wrote:Joseph Parker vs David Price on the undercard of Anthony Joshua's November 26th fight?

That's what Eddie Hearn would like to see.

That would be very good even as chief support. Great fight, would actually be beneficial to Parker to get a fight under his belt in the UK before Joshua.

Pulev is the fight that makes the most sense, Pulev is with Sauerland's and he beat Chisora on Sky.

So Hearn is sticking with Parker, Stiverne and Pulev. Fight likely to be in the UK, most likely Manchester, but maybe, although unlikely in my opinion, the Millenium stadium.

Out of the three, I'd prefer Pulev, as he'll have Parker as a mandatory anyway later in the year.

Nightmare Roy wrote:

Taansend wrote:

Like a Boss wrote:Joseph Parker vs David Price on the undercard of Anthony Joshua's November 26th fight?

That's what Eddie Hearn would like to see.

Me too

Yeah I'd be up for that

That would be great but isn't Parker already mandatory challenger? Price has his faults but he's a bit of a high-risk low-reward sort of opponent for someone with a title shot already in the bag

If we take away bias and the fact Price loves his nan more than most, why would Parker want to be piss arsing about fighting Price? It brings Parker nothing. Price has not beaten anyone as a pro. Just get Joshua v Parker on I say.

the_doctor wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote:

Taansend wrote:
Me too

Yeah I'd be up for that

That would be great but isn't Parker already mandatory challenger? Price has his faults but he's a bit of a high-risk low-reward sort of opponent for someone with a title shot already in the bag

I agree. Praker needs to ensure as best he can that he gets his title at the title.

Did anyone see Joshua shadowboxing whilst being interviewed by Inverdale after the Joyce fight?

A bit odd

clopixolacuphase wrote:A pudendum of puffins

I live in central North Wales, on the coast. A mile or so off shore there's a little island called "puffin island". Aptly named due to fact it's inhabitants are a thousand or so puffins, nothing else. You could say a true pudendum of puffins... or so it was, for hundreds of years, until they started doing tourist boat trips there and two rats hitched a lift. The rats multiplied, killed all the puffins, and now inhabit the island.

It's still called puffin island.
They still do boat trips there.

Moral of the story. Old Indian proverb. It's takes a long time to furnish and island with puffins, but a rat or two will ruin it in seconds.

Happy ending is we recently poisoned all the rats so the puffins would come back. Rat island didn't pull the tourists.

AJ v Random late opponent
Price Parker on undercard

None of them have much of a chance against Joshua.