BoxRec

asdfjkl wrote:

Syntax Error wrote:14-0 with 14 KOs would put him number 3 on the all-time HW ATG list, just behind Anthony Joshua & a long way behind Wilton Norman Chamberlain whose 0-0-0 record will never be bettered.

You seem to be new in boxing, perhaps you should google Vitali Klitschko.

SportsRatings wrote:Here's the problem: two fighters from China have "Zhang" in their name. Zhang Junlong and Zhang Zhilei (names should be reversed in Mandarin, I think)

Zhang Junlong is the fat guy with little amateur pedigree.

Zhang Zhilei is the taller, much fitter fighter who won a Silver medal in 2008 as a super heavyweight.

Zhilei clearly has more potential and I wouldn't doubt he could make the top ten some day. Junlong I doubt will make any true top 15 or ever risk stepping up; he will probably continue to pad his record with nobodies (the WBA ranks him #14 but has asked for video proof of his bouts).

Both are in their 30s so time is somewhat of an issue, though today's HWs tend to fight forever.

jezzamundo wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Syntax Error wrote:14-0 with 14 KOs would put him number 3 on the all-time HW ATG list, just behind Anthony Joshua & a long way behind Wilton Norman Chamberlain whose 0-0-0 record will never be bettered.

You seem to be new in boxing, perhaps you should google Vitali Klitschko.

Perhaps he's being sarcastic?

asdfjkl wrote:

jezzamundo wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: You seem to be new in boxing, perhaps you should google Vitali Klitschko.

Perhaps he's being sarcastic?

Lol, perhaps I'm sarcastic as well... ?
Somehow I already had the feeling some people wouldn't understand sarcasm, now it turns out I was right.

Anyway, Jun Long Zhang is probably better as Wilder.

asdfjkl wrote:

jezzamundo wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: You seem to be new in boxing, perhaps you should google Vitali Klitschko.

Perhaps he's being sarcastic?

Lol, perhaps I'm sarcastic as well... ?
Somehow I already had the feeling some people wouldn't understand sarcasm, now it turns out I was right.

Anyway, Jun Long Zhang is probably better as Wilder.

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

jezzamundo wrote:
Perhaps he's being sarcastic?

Lol, perhaps I'm sarcastic as well... ?
Somehow I already had the feeling some people wouldn't understand sarcasm, now it turns out I was right.

Anyway, Jun Long Zhang is probably better as Wilder.

As good as Wilder? Or better than Wilder?

asdfjkl wrote:

jezzamundo wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: You seem to be new in boxing, perhaps you should google Vitali Klitschko.

Perhaps he's being sarcastic?

Lol, perhaps I'm sarcastic as well... ?
Somehow I already had the feeling some people wouldn't understand sarcasm, now it turns out I was right.

Anyway, Jun Long Zhang is probably better as Wilder.

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

jezzamundo wrote:
Perhaps he's being sarcastic?

Lol, perhaps I'm sarcastic as well... ?
Somehow I already had the feeling some people wouldn't understand sarcasm, now it turns out I was right.

Anyway, Jun Long Zhang is probably better as Wilder.

As good as Wilder? Or better than Wilder?

Cutman Scabbers wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Lol, perhaps I'm sarcastic as well... ?
Somehow I already had the feeling some people wouldn't understand sarcasm, now it turns out I was right.

Anyway, Jun Long Zhang is probably better as Wilder.

As good as Wilder? Or better than Wilder?

As good than?

Rob3_142 wrote:

Cutman Scabbers wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:
As good as Wilder? Or better than Wilder?

As good than?

Yeah I think he missed my point.

But to assume that Zhang is much better than Wilder only confirms how delusional he is.

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

Cutman Scabbers wrote:

As good than?

Yeah I think he missed my point.

But to assume that Zhang is much better than Wilder only confirms how delusional he is.

I just ignored it, and the past year only seems to prove me right when it comes to Jun Long Zhang, I really hope Wilder can and will fight soon again and Jun Long Zhang getting the chance to fight a top contender to proof me right even more.

I ignored it because it's girlstalk to me. Oh, I'm clearly losing this discussion, let's talk about a completely different subject and proof myself right in that one!

You forgot the comma!

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:
Yeah I think he missed my point.

But to assume that Zhang is much better than Wilder only confirms how delusional he is.

I just ignored it, and the past year only seems to prove me right when it comes to Jun Long Zhang, I really hope Wilder can and will fight soon again and Jun Long Zhang getting the chance to fight a top contender to proof me right even more.

I ignored it because it's girlstalk to me. Oh, I'm clearly losing this discussion, let's talk about a completely different subject and proof myself right in that one!

You forgot the comma!

???

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote: Yeah I think he missed my point.

But to assume that Zhang is much better than Wilder only confirms how delusional he is.

I just ignored it, and the past year only seems to prove me right when it comes to Jun Long Zhang, I really hope Wilder can and will fight soon again and Jun Long Zhang getting the chance to fight a top contender to proof me right even more.

I ignored it because it's girlstalk to me. Oh, I'm clearly losing this discussion, let's talk about a completely different subject and proof myself right in that one!

You forgot the comma!

???

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: I just ignored it, and the past year only seems to prove me right when it comes to Jun Long Zhang, I really hope Wilder can and will fight soon again and Jun Long Zhang getting the chance to fight a top contender to proof me right even more.

I ignored it because it's girlstalk to me. Oh, I'm clearly losing this discussion, let's talk about a completely different subject and proof myself right in that one!

You forgot the comma!

???

See? Another girls trick, now everything is way to complicated to understand, let's act like an idiot while even any idiot would understand this.
So annoying...
It's not even my language, but it should be
Yeah, I think he missed my point.

And look, the subject totally changed, mission accomplished...

jezzamundo wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:
???

See? Another girls trick, now everything is way to complicated to understand, let's act like an idiot while even any idiot would understand this.
So annoying...
It's not even my language, but it should be
Yeah, I think he missed my point.

And look, the subject totally changed, mission accomplished...

Sorry, but I'm a bit confused as well and clearly I'm not the only one? You're picking on someone's post because they left out a comma? People regularly ignore the (frequent) grammatical errors in your posts, it's probably best to do the same in return.

jewboypgh wrote:This oriental heavy stinks. There's gotta be at least 2 amateurs around Pittsburgh I seen at shows who'd beat this bum. Absolutely pathetic display. He wouldn't survive 2 fights in Pennsylvania...and Boxing here it ain't what it was back in the day

crusader wrote:

jewboypgh wrote:This oriental heavy stinks. There's gotta be at least 2 amateurs around Pittsburgh I seen at shows who'd beat this bum. Absolutely pathetic display. He wouldn't survive 2 fights in Pennsylvania...and Boxing here it ain't what it was back in the day

The guy in the video is an Olympic silver medalist, Worlds bronze medalist, and Asian Games champion. Sure, he's slow and doesn't look the next great heavyweight, but he's not that bad.

Rob3_142 wrote:This is such a confusing thread - perhaps we should wait until any of these geezers fight outside of China before getting remotely excited...