BoxRec

Horse wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:Who wins if Whyte fought Hammer? Some might say Hammer because...err, Hammer is now in the top 10!

How about Malik Scott vs Whyte?

Hammer is not in the top 10, he's in the top 20.

And why wouldn't people pick Hammer or Scott to beat Whyte?

Do you think Whyte is a really good fighter or something?

Well, you clearly think Hammer and Scott are a cut above him, based on nothing but meaningless stats. Oh sorry, Malik Scott beat a fossilised Tony Thompson to get into the Boxrec top 10. Evidence, if any was needed, that he should be picked every time vs Whyte. Hammer is still shit. He isn't any better now just because he has a 'ranking' after beating a fellow bum in Teper.

BitPlayer said Hammer is in the Boxrec top 10. He's actually just outside, but let me remind you. guys like Glazkov, Browne and Scott are in there. Who suck. You can deduce this by watching footage of them in the ring.

All this will hopefully become clear to you when Joshua bowls over one of these cans to 'prove' what hardly needs to be proved for people who have eyes.

Riddick Blowe wrote:Well, you clearly think Hammer and Scott are a cut above him, based on nothing but meaningless stats. Oh sorry, Malik Scott beat a fossilised Tony Thompson to get into the Boxrec top 10. Evidence, if any was needed, that he should be picked every time vs Whyte. Hammer is still poo. He isn't any better now just because he has a 'ranking' after beating a fellow bum in Teper.

BitPlayer said Hammer is in the Boxrec top 10. He's actually just outside, but let me remind you. guys like Glazkov, Browne and Scott are in there. Who suck. You can deduce this by watching footage of them in the ring.

All this will hopefully become clear to you when Joshua bowls over one of these cans to 'prove' what hardly needs to be proved for people who have eyes.

Horse wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:Well, you clearly think Hammer and Scott are a cut above him, based on nothing but meaningless stats. Oh sorry, Malik Scott beat a fossilised Tony Thompson to get into the Boxrec top 10. Evidence, if any was needed, that he should be picked every time vs Whyte. Hammer is still poo. He isn't any better now just because he has a 'ranking' after beating a fellow bum in Teper.

BitPlayer said Hammer is in the Boxrec top 10. He's actually just outside, but let me remind you. guys like Glazkov, Browne and Scott are in there. Who suck. You can deduce this by watching footage of them in the ring.

All this will hopefully become clear to you when Joshua bowls over one of these cans to 'prove' what hardly needs to be proved for people who have eyes.

Horse's classic malfunctioning process when faced with logic

Riddick Blowe wrote:Horse's classic malfunctioning process when faced with logic

Logic?!

You're talking rubbish!

Horse wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:Horse's classic malfunctioning process when faced with logic

Logic?!

You're talking rubbish!

No, you're talking rubbish. Codswallop, even. Your stable needs clearing out, because it's full of shit!

Riddick Blowe wrote:No, you're talking rubbish. Codswallop, even. Your stable needs clearing out, because it's full of poo!

For thinking that beating highly ranked fighters is better than beating lowly ranked fighters?

BTW he was in the Top 10 when I made the comment (ranked 10) he has jus gone down again since. It's pretty common in the system*. But why do you think just because someone is in Boxrec's top 10, we have to consider them top 10 fighters?

*Plus look how close they are points wise. Browne and Chisora (ranked 10 and 11) have 222 points while Hammer has 221 points, so not surprsing adding new info or changing the system slightly altered his ranking.

And fossil Tompson is quite a level above fossil Brian Minto.

Horse wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:Horse's classic malfunctioning process when faced with logic

Logic?!

You're talking rubbish!

Hammer is top 30 at best, not top 20. Scott would take a dive against Whyte as that's how he treats his friends in the ring. Guys like Duhaupas and Ustinov are definitely above Whyte, but Hammer and Scott aren't.

Killer Blow wrote:Hammer is top 30 at best, not top 20. Scott would take a dive against Whyte as that's how he treats his friends in the ring. Guys like Duhaupas and Ustinov are definitely above Whyte, but Hammer and Scott aren't.

Scott and Whyte are friends?

Scott and Hammer are both definitely above Whyte.

Horse wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:Hammer is top 30 at best, not top 20. Scott would take a dive against Whyte as that's how he treats his friends in the ring. Guys like Duhaupas and Ustinov are definitely above Whyte, but Hammer and Scott aren't.

Scott and Whyte are friends?

Scott and Hammer are both definitely above Whyte.

Malik Scott is an arse licker. I'm 100% sure Whyte would beat him and I'm willing to put money on it.

Killer Blow wrote:Malik Scott is an arse licker. I'm 100% sure Whyte would beat him and I'm willing to put money on it.

I'd pick Scott.

It would be nice if Whyte at least beat someone in the top 75. Why is he being matched with such poor opposition if he's really a top 15ish fighter on ability? Step him up......Chisora would be perfect that, so hopefully the fight actually happens.

Chisora stops Whyte late imo

Malik Scott is to date the only name to crumple in the face of Chisora's bumbling attacks. Against Deontay Wilder he was KOd by a gust of wind. How anyone can take him seriously is beyond me. Were I Boxing Commissar I would have revoked his licence long ago.

Tuan_Jim wrote:Malik Scott is to date the only name to crumple in the face of Chisora's bumbling attacks. Against Deontay Wilder he was KOd by a gust of wind. How anyone can take him seriously is beyond me. Were I Boxing Commissar I would have revoked his licence long ago.

He's got plenty of good results and he's a good fighter. Stop talking daft.

Horse wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:Malik Scott is to date the only name to crumple in the face of Chisora's bumbling attacks. Against Deontay Wilder he was KOd by a gust of wind. How anyone can take him seriously is beyond me. Were I Boxing Commissar I would have revoked his licence long ago.

He's got plenty of good results and he's a good fighter. Stop talking daft.

Plenty? Go on.

Tuan_Jim wrote:Malik Scott is to date the only name to crumple in the face of Chisora's bumbling attacks. Against Deontay Wilder he was KOd by a gust of wind. How anyone can take him seriously is beyond me. Were I Boxing Commissar I would have revoked his licence long ago.

He got hit by Wilder and he went down. When was the last time you were hit in the head by a top heavyweight in his prime? I'm guessing never.

Killer Blow wrote:Plenty? Go on.

Look at his record. It's much better than Joshua's.

Horse wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:Plenty? Go on.

Look at his record. It's much better than Joshua's.

Maybe by the slimmest of margins. Anyone with half a brain knows who would win if they fought.

Killer Blow wrote:Maybe by the slimmest of margins. Anyone with half a brain knows who would win if they fought.

He should prove it then.

Horse wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:Maybe by the slimmest of margins. Anyone with half a brain knows who would win if they fought.

He should prove it then.

Prove it by fighting Scott himself or fighting a top contender? If you mean the latter then I agree.

Killer Blow wrote:

Horse wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:Maybe by the slimmest of margins. Anyone with half a brain knows who would win if they fought.

He should prove it then.

Prove it by fighting Scott himself or fighting a top contender? If you mean the latter then I agree.

Scott would be AJs best win


And that's not begging up Scott at all.

Killer Blow wrote:

Horse wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:Malik Scott is to date the only name to crumple in the face of Chisora's bumbling attacks. Against Deontay Wilder he was KOd by a gust of wind. How anyone can take him seriously is beyond me. Were I Boxing Commissar I would have revoked his licence long ago.

He's got plenty of good results and he's a good fighter. Stop talking daft.

Plenty? Go on.

A fossilised Tony Thompson! Which propelled Scott into the top 10 making him awesome and someone Joshua has to 'prove himself' against!

Riddick Blowe wrote:A fossilised Tony Thompson! Which propelled Scott into the top 10 making him awesome and someone Joshua has to 'prove himself' against!

Better than anyone that Joshua has beaten.