Re: Frankie Gavin failed check weigh in
Posted: 21 Oct 2016, 10:39
Excellent point
He seems more mentally handicapped rather than anything else.lefty wrote:I don't know Deakin so have no reason to defend him; fighting as a pro with a legitimate disability?Fitzy901 wrote:Maybe but as a former British Champion Woodhouse has my respect, what's Deakin ever done?ste1983 wrote:
Cuz they're both attention seeking twitter divs?
The longest losing streak in British boxinhFitzy901 wrote:Maybe but as a former British Champion Woodhouse has my respect, what's Deakin ever done?ste1983 wrote:Cuz they're both attention seeking twitter divs?Counter-puncher wrote:
How on earth did gavins weight lead to a row between rockin robin and Curtis?
Wtfclopixolacuphase wrote:Thread where 'Frankie Gavin' explains his beans on toast and diet coke regime.lefty wrote:That would be an incredible stupid idea as it is. Aside from being incredibly unhealthy; trying to ear only beans on toast once a day would cause you'd body to go into starvation mode, making it really hard to shift any way. I'm sure you already know that anyway but yeah bizarre for a professional athlete to come out with something like that.clopixolacuphase wrote: Honestly, was that really him that actually logged in and said he tried really hard to make weight by only eating beans on toast once a day, or something like that? At time it genuinely seemed to be him, but as the years gone by I would have thought it must have been somebody trolling. Surely, with weight problems throughout his career, he would have some kind of nutritionist in place?
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=140475
Found it by googling 'Frankie gavin beans on toast'.
Lol savage. Yeah as I said I have no reason to defend him and admittedlyhe does come across as a bit of a twat- he was born with quite a debilitating physical disability however which would make being a professional sportsman pretty damn hard. Maybe that's why he is a prick because he feels the disability has held him back which is kind of understandable.Fitzy901 wrote:He seems more mentally handicapped rather than anything else.lefty wrote:I don't know Deakin so have no reason to defend him; fighting as a pro with a legitimate disability?Fitzy901 wrote:
Maybe but as a former British Champion Woodhouse has my respect, what's Deakin ever done?
Some good posts on that thread to be fair.clopixolacuphase wrote:Thread where 'Frankie Gavin' explains his beans on toast and diet coke regime.lefty wrote:That would be an incredible stupid idea as it is. Aside from being incredibly unhealthy; trying to ear only beans on toast once a day would cause you'd body to go into starvation mode, making it really hard to shift any way. I'm sure you already know that anyway but yeah bizarre for a professional athlete to come out with something like that.clopixolacuphase wrote: Honestly, was that really him that actually logged in and said he tried really hard to make weight by only eating beans on toast once a day, or something like that? At time it genuinely seemed to be him, but as the years gone by I would have thought it must have been somebody trolling. Surely, with weight problems throughout his career, he would have some kind of nutritionist in place?
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=140475
Found it by googling 'Frankie gavin beans on toast'.
Patting yourself on the backG0mez wrote:Some good posts on that thread to be fair.clopixolacuphase wrote:Thread where 'Frankie Gavin' explains his beans on toast and diet coke regime.lefty wrote: That would be an incredible stupid idea as it is. Aside from being incredibly unhealthy; trying to ear only beans on toast once a day would cause you'd body to go into starvation mode, making it really hard to shift any way. I'm sure you already know that anyway but yeah bizarre for a professional athlete to come out with something like that.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=140475
Found it by googling 'Frankie gavin beans on toast'.
I would agree mate if hadnt of wished cancer upon a child and been racist to cruiserweight Laurence Bennett.lefty wrote:Lol savage. Yeah as I said I have no reason to defend him and admittedlyhe does come across as a bit of a twat- he was born with quite a debilitating physical disability however which would make being a professional sportsman pretty damn hard. Maybe that's why he is a prick because he feels the disability has held him back which is kind of understandable.Fitzy901 wrote:He seems more mentally handicapped rather than anything else.lefty wrote: I don't know Deakin so have no reason to defend him; fighting as a pro with a legitimate disability?
Same mate. Was tight but I preferred Skeete over the course.Stevieb8006 wrote:Its hard to sytick up for Gavin now isn't it? He's never taken the game seriously. I thought skeete beat him as well.
I didn't know he'd said those things mate. Not good.Fitzy901 wrote:I would agree mate if hadnt of wished cancer upon a child and been racist to cruiserweight Laurence Bennett.lefty wrote:Lol savage. Yeah as I said I have no reason to defend him and admittedlyhe does come across as a bit of a twat- he was born with quite a debilitating physical disability however which would make being a professional sportsman pretty damn hard. Maybe that's why he is a prick because he feels the disability has held him back which is kind of understandable.Fitzy901 wrote:
He seems more mentally handicapped rather than anything else.
Yeah he isn't the sharpest tool in the box.lefty wrote:I didn't know he'd said those things mate. Not good.Fitzy901 wrote:I would agree mate if hadnt of wished cancer upon a child and been racist to cruiserweight Laurence Bennett.lefty wrote: Lol savage. Yeah as I said I have no reason to defend him and admittedlyhe does come across as a bit of a twat- he was born with quite a debilitating physical disability however which would make being a professional sportsman pretty damn hard. Maybe that's why he is a prick because he feels the disability has held him back which is kind of understandable.
This. Which is why I find it irritating that people go on about fighters who "lack talent" but make up for it with hard work. Dedication and discipline are themselves talents. In particular, being able to push yourself harder than others, even when you know it comes easier to them, and not worry that it might all be a waste of time, is a hell of a talent.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I often think that in many cases, a fighter's temperament for dedication finds a level along with their talent.
As a fighter realises that he perhaps isn't quite as good as he himself and others had him believe, so the level of dedication drops off to match, - psychologically this makes failure easier to cope with, as the fighter can tell himself he did very well for someone who couldn't be bothered to train hard.
It's something people in all walks of life do, and then when they are old men, they bore people in pubs with "I could have been xyz - but I never really threw myself into it fully."
I've been telling myself the same for years, but recently I have concluded that perhaps I'm nowhere near as talented as I thought I was, or perhaps I'm just scared. Who knows.
However, the point remains that people in some senses are self-limiting, they drive themselves to the level of accomplishment that suits them best.
That is a talent too but we do it in all sports, football especially. We all know someone who is a wizard with the ball and makes the game look easy. Probably better than some pros in terms of what they can do with a ball but can't read the game well, train hard, commit etc. Those with this talent are just more visible and frustratingdookus wrote:This. Which is why I find it irritating that people go on about fighters who "lack talent" but make up for it with hard work. Dedication and discipline are themselves talents. In particular, being able to push yourself harder than others, even when you know it comes easier to them, and not worry that it might all be a waste of time, is a hell of a talent.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I often think that in many cases, a fighter's temperament for dedication finds a level along with their talent.
As a fighter realises that he perhaps isn't quite as good as he himself and others had him believe, so the level of dedication drops off to match, - psychologically this makes failure easier to cope with, as the fighter can tell himself he did very well for someone who couldn't be bothered to train hard.
It's something people in all walks of life do, and then when they are old men, they bore people in pubs with "I could have been xyz - but I never really threw myself into it fully."
I've been telling myself the same for years, but recently I have concluded that perhaps I'm nowhere near as talented as I thought I was, or perhaps I'm just scared. Who knows.
However, the point remains that people in some senses are self-limiting, they drive themselves to the level of accomplishment that suits them best.
I think that's why it's so rare aswell when you have guys like Ronaldo or Messi by all accounts who have both attributes.freddydoesdallas wrote:That is a talent too but we do it in all sports, football especially. We all know someone who is a wizard with the ball and makes the game look easy. Probably better than some pros in terms of what they can do with a ball but can't read the game well, train hard, commit etc. Those with this talent are just more visible and frustratingdookus wrote:This. Which is why I find it irritating that people go on about fighters who "lack talent" but make up for it with hard work. Dedication and discipline are themselves talents. In particular, being able to push yourself harder than others, even when you know it comes easier to them, and not worry that it might all be a waste of time, is a hell of a talent.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I often think that in many cases, a fighter's temperament for dedication finds a level along with their talent.
As a fighter realises that he perhaps isn't quite as good as he himself and others had him believe, so the level of dedication drops off to match, - psychologically this makes failure easier to cope with, as the fighter can tell himself he did very well for someone who couldn't be bothered to train hard.
It's something people in all walks of life do, and then when they are old men, they bore people in pubs with "I could have been xyz - but I never really threw myself into it fully."
I've been telling myself the same for years, but recently I have concluded that perhaps I'm nowhere near as talented as I thought I was, or perhaps I'm just scared. Who knows.
However, the point remains that people in some senses are self-limiting, they drive themselves to the level of accomplishment that suits them best.
Definitely more rare these days. Raw talent will get you to L1 these days rather than the top. I'm sure I read that utd players used to laugh at ronaldo for all the extra sessions and dead ball stuff he used to do. Doubt that would happen nowlefty wrote:I think that's why it's so rare aswell when you have guys like Ronaldo or Messi by all accounts who have both attributes.freddydoesdallas wrote:That is a talent too but we do it in all sports, football especially. We all know someone who is a wizard with the ball and makes the game look easy. Probably better than some pros in terms of what they can do with a ball but can't read the game well, train hard, commit etc. Those with this talent are just more visible and frustratingdookus wrote: This. Which is why I find it irritating that people go on about fighters who "lack talent" but make up for it with hard work. Dedication and discipline are themselves talents. In particular, being able to push yourself harder than others, even when you know it comes easier to them, and not worry that it might all be a waste of time, is a hell of a talent.