BoxRec

boxing_rocks wrote:

Keko wrote:Canelo is the better boxer of the two mentioned.

Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.

Realistically it's better than Muray and Lem and are not they Floyd and Lara

Keko wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:

Keko wrote:Canelo is the better boxer of the two mentioned.

Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.

Realistically it's better than Muray and Lem and are not they Floyd and Lara

What is better than Murray and Lemieux ? We are talking about boxing skills, not quality of opposition, especially opposition Canelo was humiliated by.

boxing_rocks wrote:

Keko wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:
Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.

Realistically it's better than Muray and Lem and are not they Floyd and Lara

What is better than Murray and Lemieux ? We are talking about boxing skills, not quality of opposition, especially opposition Canelo was humiliated by.

So are not these two just a measure of quality. I do not have to explain I guess. You talk about them as if they were the best of the best. He just would not they beat Canelo. GGG probably would have won.

The point is that if the two of them some big wins then this is ridiculous.
G is super interesting to me not you got it wrong, and not against .

Keko wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:

Keko wrote:
Realistically it's better than Muray and Lem and are not they Floyd and Lara

What is better than Murray and Lemieux ? We are talking about boxing skills, not quality of opposition, especially opposition Canelo was humiliated by.

So are not these two just a measure of quality. I do not have to explain I guess. You talk about them as if they were the best of the best. He just would not they beat Canelo. GGG probably would have won.

The point is that if the two of them some big wins then this is ridiculous.
G is super interesting to me not you got it wrong, and not against .

I am guessing English is not a strength of yours

boxing_rocks wrote:

Keko wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:
What is better than Murray and Lemieux ? We are talking about boxing skills, not quality of opposition, especially opposition Canelo was humiliated by.

So are not these two just a measure of quality. I do not have to explain I guess. You talk about them as if they were the best of the best. He just would not they beat Canelo. GGG probably would have won.

The point is that if the two of them some big wins then this is ridiculous.
G is super interesting to me not you got it wrong, and not against .

I am guessing English is not a strength of yours

Is not, better know Italian, Spanish, Croatian, German? You know that a foreign language?
I'm trying.

But in fact it's not a big problem and only mention in connection Canelo / Murray

boxing_rocks wrote:

Keko wrote:Canelo is the better boxer of the two mentioned.

Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.

Yeah, and I'd like to see if Mr. 150,000 could fathom the style of Mayweather.

In a P4P fight, Golovkin would be completely impotent against a technician like Money.

It would be a 12 round one-sided bitch slapping.

SenorPipino wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:

Keko wrote:Canelo is the better boxer of the two mentioned.

Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.

Yeah, and I'd like to see if Mr. 150,000 could fathom the style of Mayweather.

In a P4P fight, Golovkin would be completely impotent against a technician like Money.

It would be a 12 round one-sided bitch slapping.

Just like Maidana was "completely impotent" against Floyd the technician?
Go ahead and tell me how Maidana is more skilled than Golovkin

nuthin4sumpthin wrote:

SenorPipino wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:
Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.

Yeah, and I'd like to see if Mr. 150,000 could fathom the style of Mayweather.

In a P4P fight, Golovkin would be completely impotent against a technician like Money.

It would be a 12 round one-sided bitch slapping.

Just like Maidana was "completely impotent" against Floyd the technician?
Go ahead and tell me how Maidana is more skilled than Golovkin

Exactly. Mayweather would end the same way as Brook.