Page 2 of 2
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 09:05
by davie
keithmoonhangover wrote:dberry wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Browne's in the same boat as Haye. Neither are worthy of a title shot at the moment.
Bullshit, pudendum, Browne worked his way up and took an, albeit soft, version of the WBA title from the title holder, Haye has had a massive layoff and not yet, in reality, fought!
I used to like you but nowadays you're proving to be a total imbecile, you inbred fucken hick. Glad you never took me up with my offer for a paid working holiday to Melbourne, you're a total dick.
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
This thread just took an interesting turn!
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 09:11
by handsofstone
Haha jee whizz
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 09:53
by Dixonian
asdfjkl wrote:Dixonian wrote:Like a Boss wrote:Lucas Browne has said David Haye doesn't deserve a world title shot :
"Coming off a two- to three-year lay-off and coming back fighting two bums basically, how does that get you No 1 ranked in all three belts and then a world title shot by fighting two people that aren't ranked and no one knows?
"I don't think he deserves anything, no."
"Just in regards to the UK fans, it's good that I can actually fight someone like Shannon Briggs that David Haye has avoided," said Briggs.
"I know that David Haye said that if he did fight on his undercard and win, then he would fight him. I believe he has ducked him because he's too dangerous, but here I am fighting Shannon Briggs now.
http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... title-shot
What has Briggs done except fight bums?
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Except the mighty Zumbano Love.
Briggs is very good at
asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 09:56
by Dixonian
davie wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:dberry wrote:
Bullshit, pudendum, Browne worked his way up and took an, albeit soft, version of the WBA title from the title holder, Haye has had a massive layoff and not yet, in reality, fought!
I used to like you but nowadays you're proving to be a total imbecile, you inbred fucken hick. Glad you never took me up with my offer for a paid working holiday to Melbourne, you're a total dick.
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
This thread just took an interesting turn!

Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 10:58
by gilgamesh
dberry wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Browne's in the same boat as Haye. Neither are worthy of a title shot at the moment.
Bullshit, pudendum, Browne worked his way up and took an, albeit soft, version of the WBA title from the title holder, Haye has had a massive layoff and not yet, in reality, fought!
I used to like you but nowadays you're proving to be a total imbecile, you inbred fucken hick. Glad you never took me up with my offer for a paid working holiday to Melbourne, you're a total dick.
Damn dude is Browne a blood relative to you or something?
I'm not insulting the guy personally I just don't think he's done enough yet to be competing for World Titles really. I thought it was awesome that he beat Chagaev, and I was glad that he had his PED results overturned since he was innocent of the charges. I have no doubt he'll beat Briggs. I just don't think a fight between a guy who's arguably no better than Top 15 and a shot old man should be for a World Title. Sorry if that makes me a d*ck.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 12:36
by fizzjambo
asdfjkl wrote:Dixonian wrote:Like a Boss wrote:Lucas Browne has said David Haye doesn't deserve a world title shot :
"Coming off a two- to three-year lay-off and coming back fighting two bums basically, how does that get you No 1 ranked in all three belts and then a world title shot by fighting two people that aren't ranked and no one knows?
"I don't think he deserves anything, no."
"Just in regards to the UK fans, it's good that I can actually fight someone like Shannon Briggs that David Haye has avoided," said Briggs.
"I know that David Haye said that if he did fight on his undercard and win, then he would fight him. I believe he has ducked him because he's too dangerous, but here I am fighting Shannon Briggs now.
http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... title-shot
What has Briggs done except fight bums?
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Like Love who took him the distance in a performance that showed just where Briggs is at? You truly are gullible to a staggering extent
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 12:51
by jamesmcdonnell
Dixonian wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Dixonian wrote:
What has Briggs done except fight bums?
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Except the mighty Zumbano Love.
Briggs is very good at
asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
Mate, it's like trying to ask a dandelion to discuss philosophy, you're wasting your time. Either this person is......
A) Fukcin retarded
b) has jizz-stained posters of Briggs all over their cell
c) Is Shannon Briggs
d) Is Shannon Briggs' Mum, Dad, Auntie or other close relative.
e) Has Shannon Briggs hanging out their shitter as we speak.
Tick as appropriate.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 13:07
by asdfjkl
Dixonian wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Dixonian wrote:
What has Briggs done except fight bums?
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Except the mighty Zumbano Love.
Briggs is very good at
asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
Zumbano Love even stated Briggs is the hardest puncher he has ever been in the ring with, somehow he knew that beforehand and because of that tried to make Briggs tired instead of fighting him. Ofcourse he failed to win anyway and in fact Briggs easely won all rounds, that's how good Briggs his stamina was.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 13:26
by jamesmcdonnell
asdfjkl wrote:Dixonian wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Except the mighty Zumbano Love.
Briggs is very good at
asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
Zumbano Love even stated Briggs is the hardest puncher he has ever been in the ring with, somehow he knew that beforehand and because of that tried to make Briggs tired instead of fighting him. Ofcourse he failed to win anyway and in fact Briggs easely won all rounds, that's how good Briggs his stamina was.
ZZZzzZZZz
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 13:42
by elephant man
So Haye doesn't deserve a title shot because he's fought "Two bums" yet 45 year old Shannon Briggs, who was hospitalised the last time he fought someone with something resembling talent six years ago, is fine? And then the winner having to face the utterly useless Fres Oquendo is also fine? The WBA is a joke 'title' basically the WBO of the 90s. A sham of an organisation. How are the likes of Oquendo and Briggs so highly ranked? Are their names picked out of a bingo machine or do they have incriminating photos of president Gilberto Mendoza?
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 14:10
by asdfjkl
elephant man wrote:So Haye doesn't deserve a title shot because he's fought "Two bums" yet 45 year old Shannon Briggs, who was hospitalised the last time he fought someone with something resembling talent six years ago, is fine? And then the winner having to face the utterly useless Fres Oquendo is also fine? The WBA is a joke 'title' basically the WBO of the 90s. A sham of an organisation. How are the likes of Oquendo and Briggs so highly ranked? Are their names picked out of a bingo machine or do they have incriminating photos of president Gilberto Mendoza?
Briggs because there's a reason guys like Haye and Wilder for example do everything they can to avoid him, Oquendo because he won something in court.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 14:26
by lefty
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Dixonian wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Except the mighty Zumbano Love.
Briggs is very good at
asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
Mate, it's like trying to ask a dandelion to discuss philosophy, you're wasting your time. Either this person is......
A) Fukcin retarded
b) has jizz-stained posters of Briggs all over their cell
c) Is Shannon Briggs
d) Is Shannon Briggs' Mum, Dad, Auntie or other close relative.
e) Has Shannon Briggs hanging out their shitter as we speak.
Tick as appropriate.

Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 15:08
by Stuarty
Like a Boss wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Browne, Briggs and Haye haven't done enough between them recently to merit a world title shot! It's the WBA regular so it's a very lightly regarded diluted version of a world title.
Browne's last WAS for the title

It was for the secondary WBA belt mate. Browne v Briggs for even that husk of a belt doesn't look right to me. I get you're Australian and sticking up for your man but Browne and Briggs aren't anywhere near the elite of the heavyweight division and shouldn't even be fighting for the WBA secondary title. I'm a Scot and we have a similar situation with Ricky Burns holding the same WBA belt at 140. It's a joke and nobody really sees him as a legitimate world champion and it'll be the same with the Browne v Briggs winner. Don't get me wrong I like Browne he comes across a decent bloke and is fun to watch but is he elite at heavy? Not for me.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 16:01
by Dixonian
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Dixonian wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Except the mighty Zumbano Love.
Briggs is very good at
asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
Mate, it's like trying to ask a dandelion to discuss philosophy, you're wasting your time. Either this person is......
A) Fukcin retarded
b) has jizz-stained posters of Briggs all over their cell
c) Is Shannon Briggs
d) Is Shannon Briggs' Mum, Dad, Auntie or other close relative.
e) Has Shannon Briggs hanging out their shitter as we speak.
Tick as appropriate.

Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 04 Nov 2016, 14:06
by PredatorHayds
Stuarty30 wrote:Like a Boss wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Browne, Briggs and Haye haven't done enough between them recently to merit a world title shot! It's the WBA regular so it's a very lightly regarded diluted version of a world title.
Browne's last WAS for the title

It was for the secondary WBA belt mate. Browne v Briggs for even that husk of a belt doesn't look right to me. I get you're Australian and sticking up for your man but Browne and Briggs aren't anywhere near the elite of the heavyweight division and shouldn't even be fighting for the WBA secondary title. I'm a Scot and we have a similar situation with Ricky Burns holding the same WBA belt at 140. It's a joke and nobody really sees him as a legitimate world champion and it'll be the same with the Browne v Briggs winner. Don't get me wrong I like Browne he comes across a decent bloke and is fun to watch but is he elite at heavy? Not for me.
Burns the real WBA champion mate. No WBA super champion in that division.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 05 Nov 2016, 08:48
by Stuarty
PredatorHayds wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Like a Boss wrote:
Browne's last WAS for the title

It was for the secondary WBA belt mate. Browne v Briggs for even that husk of a belt doesn't look right to me. I get you're Australian and sticking up for your man but Browne and Briggs aren't anywhere near the elite of the heavyweight division and shouldn't even be fighting for the WBA secondary title. I'm a Scot and we have a similar situation with Ricky Burns holding the same WBA belt at 140. It's a joke and nobody really sees him as a legitimate world champion and it'll be the same with the Browne v Briggs winner. Don't get me wrong I like Browne he comes across a decent bloke and is fun to watch but is he elite at heavy? Not for me.
Burns the real WBA champion mate. No WBA super champion in that division.
My bad but it's the WBA lol. They're gonna end up about as relevant as the WBU the rate they're going. I don't mean any disrespect to Burns or Browne but the WBA are a shambles of an organisation.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 05 Nov 2016, 10:35
by Syntax Error
David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot, but Shannon Briggs does?
What twisted logic did Browne use to come to that ridiculous conclusion?
Yes, Haye hasn't fought a true quality opponent in five years & he was embarrassing when he did, plus he was inactive for 3.5 years of that time, but when was the last time Briggs fought someone with a pulse?
The fact is, neither Haye nor Briggs deserve any type of title shot.
This just sums up how dire the HW division is in 2016.
The sooner the book closes on this year, the better, as far as HW boxing is concerned.
It has to be the most fallow year in modern HW history.
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 05 Nov 2016, 10:43
by lillywhite14
People getting title shots based on a catchphrase is where heavyweight boxing currently sits!
There you go Price. That's your route to a title shot. Beats up journeymen and "stalks" the top fighters. Easy enough surely? 'Lets go champ!'
Terrible, terrible, terrible fight.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 10 Nov 2016, 15:47
by asdfjkl
Syntax Error wrote:David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot, but Shannon Briggs does?
What twisted logic did Browne use to come to that ridiculous conclusion?
Yes, Haye hasn't fought a true quality opponent in five years & he was embarrassing when he did, plus he was inactive for 3.5 years of that time, but when was the last time Briggs fought someone with a pulse?
The fact is, neither Haye nor Briggs deserve any type of title shot.
This just sums up how dire the HW division is in 2016.
The sooner the book closes on this year, the better, as far as HW boxing is concerned.
It has to be the most fallow year in modern HW history.
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
It's clear nobody dares to face Briggs and everybody dares to face Daffy, so saying Briggs deserves the titleshot more makes sense.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Posted: 10 Nov 2016, 19:08
by Killer Blow
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Dixonian wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Except the mighty Zumbano Love.
Briggs is very good at
asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
Mate, it's like trying to ask a dandelion to discuss philosophy, you're wasting your time. Either this person is......
A) Fukcin retarded
b) has jizz-stained posters of Briggs all over their cell
c) Is Shannon Briggs
d) Is Shannon Briggs' Mum, Dad, Auntie or other close relative.
e) Has Shannon Briggs hanging out their shitter as we speak.
Tick as appropriate.
You might be onto something here. It would explain why he's also completely obsessed with Wilder to worrying depths.