Page 2 of 2

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:10
by Hardhitters11
knockout artist wrote:No.

Tyson KO1 Audley.

Looking at it again last night, Tyson was sensational in that first round. In the first 3 minutes he looked the the best in the world.
Please tell me you dont mean this KO artist...come on mate Tyson looked better than he had for a while but by no means did he look anything special and definately not the best in the world...

I have watched the fight 7-8 times since that night and Tyson wasnt throwing his shots with anywhere near his usual power and his speed and snap wasnt there either...

HH

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:15
by BubiScholz
Harrison hasn“t fought a hitter till now. so the chance of KO in the first round is very high.

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:19
by Hardhitters11
My comment wasnt about the Tyson beating or Koing Tyson it was regarding how good Tyson supposedly looked...should have been clearer..

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:25
by Kilburn
How are you measuring Tyson's punching power HH?....

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:31
by knockout artist
Hardhitters11 wrote:
knockout artist wrote:No.

Tyson KO1 Audley.

Looking at it again last night, Tyson was sensational in that first round. In the first 3 minutes he looked the the best in the world.
Please tell me you dont mean this KO artist...come on mate Tyson looked better than he had for a while but by no means did he look anything special and definately not the best in the world...

I have watched the fight 7-8 times since that night and Tyson wasnt throwing his shots with anywhere near his usual power and his speed and snap wasnt there either...

HH
They say you are only as good as your last fight.

In the first round Tyson looked better than Klitschko, Byrd and Ruiz.

They all looked awful in their last fights.

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:34
by Hardhitters11
knockout artist wrote:
Hardhitters11 wrote:
knockout artist wrote:No.

Tyson KO1 Audley.

Looking at it again last night, Tyson was sensational in that first round. In the first 3 minutes he looked the the best in the world.
Please tell me you dont mean this KO artist...come on mate Tyson looked better than he had for a while but by no means did he look anything special and definately not the best in the world...

I have watched the fight 7-8 times since that night and Tyson wasnt throwing his shots with anywhere near his usual power and his speed and snap wasnt there either...

HH
They say you are only as good as your last fight.

In the first round Tyson looked better than Klitschko, Byrd and Ruiz.

They all looked awful in their last fights.
My apologies mate I agree on that for definate!!

HH

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:35
by Hardhitters11
Kilburn wrote:How are you measuring Tyson's punching power HH?....
His punches just had no snap and didnt appear to be carrying much power to me...he was winging punches but wasnt snapping with them..

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:38
by knockout artist
Hardhitters11 wrote:
Kilburn wrote:How are you measuring Tyson's punching power HH?....
His punches just had no snap and didnt appear to be carrying much power to me...he was winging punches but wasnt snapping with them..
I was astounded at the shots Williams took.

Is his chin THAT good or was Tysons power below par?

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:42
by Hardhitters11
Thats another reason I made the power assumption as Williams got blasted by Sam yet took Tysons power...somethings definately not right there....as I said Tyson's shots seemed to lack realy snap as well which is why I am actually inclined to believe the knee story...He should retire regardless though...

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 08:52
by Kilburn
Williams looked away with the fairies against Samil Sam, as he did against Sprott at times, and even in the N'Gou fight. It's those kind of performances that got him selected by Team Tyson.

Danny stepped up his whole game just when he needed to. End of.

Posted: 05 Aug 2004, 14:01
by Hardhitters11
Not at all mate, Yes Williams fought well but Tyson was and is a completely shot fighter...

It amazes me that the very same people who said Williams was useless are now going on like he is an exceptional fighter...complete bollocks..

Williams did well but he was fighting a fighter that IMO isnt in the top ten in the world anyway and is shot to absolute shit...When you look at how shot Tyson is this really isnt that much of an amazing result...If it wasnt Williams it would have been another domestic/European level fighter believe me...

Time well tell..

HH

Posted: 06 Aug 2004, 04:56
by Kilburn
Mate, first of all I have to say it's a shame that you're almost certainly going to have your fingers crossed that Danny Williams gets KTFO in his next fight just so you can come on here and tell us how we all jumped on the bandwagon (again) and ended up with egg on our faces.

Secondly, no Danny Williams is not an exceptional fighter, his major lack of consistency is a huge hinderance. But his performance last Friday night was exceptional.

It really appears to me that you're trying to save face because of the cock-sure way you advised all the suckers not to throw their money away on Williams. Almost your entire emphasis now is on how bad Tyson was in the fight, even going as far as to suggest that he wasn't punching with the same power as he normally does. That's pretty weak.

Face it mate you got it wrong just like the rest of us. Williams could produce on this occasion.

Posted: 06 Aug 2004, 06:45
by DavidPayne
This entire THREAD

:lol: