Page 2 of 2

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 11:30
by boxing_rocks
Tanzio wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
lefty wrote:GGG has crushed cans and a blown up welterweight. You shouldn't be P4P no1 based off of that.
GGG takes this version of Ward out at 175.
:lol: 3G had his opportunity at 168 and he passed on it, so the current P4P king went north and showed him what real ballz are.

Siddown and stfu with the 3G woulda, coulda bullsh!t. He shoulda fought Ward at 168. He chose to keep being a man among boyz.
Do you have memory issues? Don't you remember that Golovkin had a Lemieux PPV signed when Ward's "offer" came ?

Also, at 168, Ward was faster and less awkward, at least his 2011 version. Once again, Golovkin takes current Ward out at any weight.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 11:33
by lefty
boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
GGG takes this version of Ward out at 175.
:lol: 3G had his opportunity at 168 and he passed on it, so the current P4P king went north and showed him what real ballz are.

Siddown and stfu with the 3G woulda, coulda bullsh!t. He shoulda fought Ward at 168. He chose to keep being a man among boyz.
Do you have memory issues? Don't you remember that Golovkin had a Lemieux PPV signed when Ward's "offer" came ?

Also, at 168, Ward was faster and less awkward, at least his 2011 version. Once again, Golovkin takes current Ward out at any weight.
To be fair he could have pulled out of the Lemieux fight or paid him step aside money so he could fight Ward. It wouldn't be the first time fighters have done that.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 11:37
by Tanzio
boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
GGG takes this version of Ward out at 175.
:lol: 3G had his opportunity at 168 and he passed on it, so the current P4P king went north and showed him what real ballz are.

Siddown and stfu with the 3G woulda, coulda bullsh!t. He shoulda fought Ward at 168. He chose to keep being a man among boyz.
Do you have memory issues? Don't you remember that Golovkin had a Lemieux PPV signed when Ward's "offer" came ?

Also, at 168, Ward was faster and less awkward, at least his 2011 version. Once again, Golovkin takes current Ward out at any weight.
Wait a minute :confused: didn't you say this about Krusher?

Btw, Krusher did the holding last night, or my prediction may well have come true.

3G needs to step it up, and I am a huge 3G fan. Making excuses for him is not a good look, but you are too oblivious to recognize that.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 16:50
by boxing_rocks
Tanzio wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote: :lol: 3G had his opportunity at 168 and he passed on it, so the current P4P king went north and showed him what real ballz are.

Siddown and stfu with the 3G woulda, coulda bullsh!t. He shoulda fought Ward at 168. He chose to keep being a man among boyz.
Do you have memory issues? Don't you remember that Golovkin had a Lemieux PPV signed when Ward's "offer" came ?

Also, at 168, Ward was faster and less awkward, at least his 2011 version. Once again, Golovkin takes current Ward out at any weight.
Wait a minute :confused: didn't you say this about Krusher?

Btw, Krusher did the holding last night, or my prediction may well have come true.

3G needs to step it up, and I am a huge 3G fan. Making excuses for him is not a good look, but you are too oblivious to recognize that.
Kovalev decided to box with Ward and did it successfully enough to win the fight. The Hopkins fight and the early success in the Ward fight made him think that he could coast to a comfortable victory. However, Ward is a little better than a 49-year old Hopkins, so he managed to win about 4 rounds and get a decision gifted to him.

Kovalev was holding Ward's head in his arm pit to avoid headbutts, and that was a right thing to do. He also was winning the wrestling part, but in no way he was initiating it.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 16:57
by SaadOffTheDeck
lefty wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote: :lol: 3G had his opportunity at 168 and he passed on it, so the current P4P king went north and showed him what real ballz are.

Siddown and stfu with the 3G woulda, coulda bullsh!t. He shoulda fought Ward at 168. He chose to keep being a man among boyz.
Do you have memory issues? Don't you remember that Golovkin had a Lemieux PPV signed when Ward's "offer" came ?

Also, at 168, Ward was faster and less awkward, at least his 2011 version. Once again, Golovkin takes current Ward out at any weight.
To be fair he could have pulled out of the Lemieux fight or paid him step aside money so he could fight Ward. It wouldn't be the first time fighters have done that.
:lol:

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 19:50
by world ranked
Jip wrote:kovalev won the fight. his power is elite. but his condition is not so great, he is stiff and his mind is not so great and his logical understanding of when to push and go for the kill. he was doing not much and waisting important time in which he could land and hurt ward had he gone ALL OUT.

ward is a very good boxer, but wont never be elite. 35 % of his gameplan is illegal, rabbit punching, holding, wrestling, grabing. he is just lucky that he got usa refs who let things slide. instead of inforcing the rules of boxing and deducting him points.

rigondeaux, 10 times more athletic than them, faster than them, more techniqule than them, just better.
He gets dropped 10 times more against weaker comp too.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 19:57
by diddy
Ward stood in there with Kovalev and GGG is going to beat Ward? GGG is 3 inches smaller than Kovalev for f*ck sake. GGG isnt having the success from the outside that Kovalev did, he's too small. Which means not only can Ward box from a safer distance against GGG but GGG will be forced to get inside more to land - which is exactly where Ward is his strongest, in the clinch. All last nite did was confirm that GGG cant beat Ward. But I'm sure plenty of clowns here will swear he would win, just like they were sure Kovalev would kill Ward.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 17:45
by Jip
diddy wrote:Ward stood in there with Kovalev and GGG is going to beat Ward? GGG is 3 inches smaller than Kovalev for f*ck sake. GGG isnt having the success from the outside that Kovalev did, he's too small. Which means not only can Ward box from a safer distance against GGG but GGG will be forced to get inside more to land - which is exactly where Ward is his strongest, in the clinch. All last nite did was confirm that GGG cant beat Ward. But I'm sure plenty of clowns here will swear he would win, just like they were sure Kovalev would kill Ward.
weight makes a lot of difference.

look at chris byrd, a good heavyweight, lost weight and look what happened to weight drained byrd.

ggg can beat a super middleweight version of ward. remember the ward/abraham fight, arthur was throwing these bombs and ward had problem in the first 4 rounds, than arthur gased out and wards better condition and technique did the work. ggg got much better condition than arthur, so is in the techniqul departmant.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 19:27
by boxing_rocks
SMW version of Ward was fast for his weight. The current version is much slower. Golovkin will be timing him for as long as it lasts. Yes, Golovkin will need to avoid clinches, but Ward's reach advantage will be beaten by Golovkin's better speed and timing. Golovkin's footwork and ability to cut the ring is significantly better than Kovalev's, and so is his killer instinct.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 06:38
by Jip
and i was right. after watching loma fight reminds me of what top 2 is :OhYes:

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 11:09
by Tanzio
Jip wrote:and i was right. after watching loma fight reminds me of what top 2 is :OhYes:
Me too; Ward closely followed by Krusher.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 11:27
by zorndeslammes
Kovalev is a good fighter but nothing about him screams "p4p" level talent. That said, I think he could beat a lot of lower level heavyweights and most of the cruiserweights, but I'm not convinced he can beat Usyk. Someone who is P4P #1 shouldn't be a fighter I consider to be 50/50 moving up in weight to face a relatively new competitor and unranked P4P competitor.

Ward is unquestionably very good still, but he is so reliant on his left hand now that it appears to be a fundamental flaw. Maybe he manages to win a wide decision in a rematch against Kovalev, or Sergei realizes part of the mistake in the first fight was not being active enough early on and allowing Ward to get in a rhythm; to me, that's a pick em contest I have little faith I'll ever see given Ward's general refusal thus far in his career to make rematches. Like Kovalev, I look at a move up in weight to Usyk and even Dorticos and I'm not at all convinced that Ward is capable of winning those fights now.

On the flipside, regardless of how bad Walters was prepared mentally or physically last night, you can't help but be impressed with Lomachenko's performance to a great degree. He appears to be peerless at 130, and it is hard to seriously take most 135 or 140 pound talent as serious threats to him. Who here would pick "World Champion" Ricky Burns to beat Vasyl Lomachenko? Or how about world ranked John Molina Jr.? These are some of the people there, and he makes them look foolish. That to me is a P4P level guy - someone who's talent clearly can translate to dominance against lesser skilled but bigger men.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 11:39
by Tanzio
zorndeslammes wrote:Kovalev is a good fighter but nothing about him screams "p4p" level talent. That said, I think he could beat a lot of lower level heavyweights and most of the cruiserweights, but I'm not convinced he can beat Usyk. Someone who is P4P #1 shouldn't be a fighter I consider to be 50/50 moving up in weight to face a relatively new competitor and unranked P4P competitor.

Ward is unquestionably very good still, but he is so reliant on his left hand now that it appears to be a fundamental flaw. Maybe he manages to win a wide decision in a rematch against Kovalev, or Sergei realizes part of the mistake in the first fight was not being active enough early on and allowing Ward to get in a rhythm; to me, that's a pick em contest I have little faith I'll ever see given Ward's general refusal thus far in his career to make rematches. Like Kovalev, I look at a move up in weight to Usyk and even Dorticos and I'm not at all convinced that Ward is capable of winning those fights now.

On the flipside, regardless of how bad Walters was prepared mentally or physically last night, you can't help but be impressed with Lomachenko's performance to a great degree. He appears to be peerless at 130, and it is hard to seriously take most 135 or 140 pound talent as serious threats to him. Who here would pick "World Champion" Ricky Burns to beat Vasyl Lomachenko? Or how about world ranked John Molina Jr.? These are some of the people there, and he makes them look foolish. That to me is a P4P level guy - someone who's talent clearly can translate to dominance against lesser skilled but bigger men.
Nice post. I agree with Loma being a great talent with the potential to be P4P #1 and the likelihood of dominating any but the top dogs of 135 and 140. But that is all conjecture at this point. Crawford, Chocolatito, Ward, Krusher, Pac, GingerHead 3G and others are case hardened. Crawford humbled Postol. Krusher lost a fight that could go either way to Ward, etc..

Loma is not there yet.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 11:50
by zorndeslammes
Loma isn't a #1 P4P guy for me either - right now my tops would be Choc (who's had the best career of any flyweight in the modern era IMO) followed by Pacquiao and Floyd ahead of both if you want to consider him as semi active still. Ward I kinda have to consider given that he's primarily been a super middleweight that has now moved up and scored the Kovalev fight for him by one point, but I honestly tend to look more at Canelo because he's fought far superior competition career wise. Golovkin is much like Lomachenko for me, except that he's been at this all longer, but like Lomachenko, unless he moves up and faces the absolute best at either 168 or 175, I feel extremely confident in his ability to win, and I'd probably rate both over Ward because of that in tandem with other stuff like activity over the last 3-4 years.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 12:09
by davie
diddy wrote:Ward stood in there with Kovalev and GGG is going to beat Ward? GGG is 3 inches smaller than Kovalev for f*ck sake. GGG isnt having the success from the outside that Kovalev did, he's too small. Which means not only can Ward box from a safer distance against GGG but GGG will be forced to get inside more to land - which is exactly where Ward is his strongest, in the clinch. All last nite did was confirm that GGG cant beat Ward. But I'm sure plenty of clowns here will swear he would win, just like they were sure Kovalev would kill Ward.
That's all taken with the presumption GGG is just a cut down Kovalev.

He isn't!
They are different fighters with their own strengths and weaknesses.

Of course there are similarities in their styles but there are also glaring differences.

I found the potential Ward vs GGG match up as hard to call as the Ward vs Kovalev one.
But I think 175lb would favour Ward and I'd give him the edge there.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 12:36
by Jip
zorndeslammes wrote:Kovalev is a good fighter but nothing about him screams "p4p" level talent. That said, I think he could beat a lot of lower level heavyweights and most of the cruiserweights, but I'm not convinced he can beat Usyk. Someone who is P4P #1 shouldn't be a fighter I consider to be 50/50 moving up in weight to face a relatively new competitor and unranked P4P competitor.

Ward is unquestionably very good still, but he is so reliant on his left hand now that it appears to be a fundamental flaw. Maybe he manages to win a wide decision in a rematch against Kovalev, or Sergei realizes part of the mistake in the first fight was not being active enough early on and allowing Ward to get in a rhythm; to me, that's a pick em contest I have little faith I'll ever see given Ward's general refusal thus far in his career to make rematches. Like Kovalev, I look at a move up in weight to Usyk and even Dorticos and I'm not at all convinced that Ward is capable of winning those fights now.

On the flipside, regardless of how bad Walters was prepared mentally or physically last night, you can't help but be impressed with Lomachenko's performance to a great degree. He appears to be peerless at 130, and it is hard to seriously take most 135 or 140 pound talent as serious threats to him. Who here would pick "World Champion" Ricky Burns to beat Vasyl Lomachenko? Or how about world ranked John Molina Jr.? These are some of the people there, and he makes them look foolish. That to me is a P4P level guy - someone who's talent clearly can translate to dominance against lesser skilled but bigger men.

correct

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 12 Apr 2020, 15:26
by RonnyJ
what a good thread i did back than

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 12 Apr 2020, 18:14
by gilgamesh
I'm reminded of that SNL sketch where Will Ferrell spends years and years sucking his own dick

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 12 Apr 2020, 18:17
by lazboy
RonnyJ wrote: 12 Apr 2020, 15:26 what a good thread i did back

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 12 Apr 2020, 18:20
by gilgamesh
gilgamesh wrote: 20 Nov 2016, 02:15
Jip wrote:
yeah kov and ward beat better men, but in terms of boxing ability, skills they inferior to rigo.
tell me, who is faster, more athletic, more techniquly sound, who has the better footwork. rigo, ward or kovalev.
Well obviously the guy that's 50 pounds lighter than either of those 2 is faster. I think Kovalev and Ward are equally technically sound to Rigo just with a different approach than him. I'd give it to you that Rigo has better footwork.

But you gotta have the wins to back a P4P #1 ranking and he just doesn't have enough meaningful ones. His biggest win is still Donaire from a few years ago, and it doesn't look like another defining win is coming his way anytime soon.
Hell I was more right years ago than you were Jip :lol:

Rigo's biggest win is STILL Donaire. It never got better than that.

Re: These 2 aint p4p #1

Posted: 12 Apr 2020, 19:05
by RonnyJ
gilgamesh wrote: 12 Apr 2020, 18:20
gilgamesh wrote: 20 Nov 2016, 02:15

Well obviously the guy that's 50 pounds lighter than either of those 2 is faster. I think Kovalev and Ward are equally technically sound to Rigo just with a different approach than him. I'd give it to you that Rigo has better footwork.

But you gotta have the wins to back a P4P #1 ranking and he just doesn't have enough meaningful ones. His biggest win is still Donaire from a few years ago, and it doesn't look like another defining win is coming his way anytime soon.
Hell I was more right years ago than you were Jip :lol:

Rigo's biggest win is STILL Donaire. It never got better than that.
:TU: :lol: