Re: Haye vs Bellew is ON
Posted: 25 Nov 2016, 11:43
What the hell sort of diss is that?thechump wrote:I thought bellew was funny on sky then "im not gonna call u David no more,from now on im gonna call u Bob" haha
What the hell sort of diss is that?thechump wrote:I thought bellew was funny on sky then "im not gonna call u David no more,from now on im gonna call u Bob" haha
Yep this, does he have some situation we don't know about that means this is his last fight anyway? Big final pay day? Haye sparked out a seriously tough guy in Chisora what makes Bellew think he's going to be able to avoid those punches or take them? I just don't get it, there's confidence and there's lunacy, I know which one this looks like. Especially since for all it was an awful fight Klitschko did hit Haye a couple of times and didn't have him in particular trouble, Bellew being around long enough to hit Haye enough times to take him out? Just not sure.Naandrew wrote:Bellew gonna get absolutely annihilated
that result is 5-2 with paddypower, im gonna lump on if I can find out if antepost rules apply to boxingsmiling assassin wrote:Both a couple os shithouses and couldn't care less who wins but Bellew is getting sparked within 3
And Thurman Garcia that day tooTaansend wrote:I've already booked the day off work![]()
10k at Venice Beach in the morning then West Ham v Chelsea then the boxing.
I'm hoping there's a Briggs Zarate rematch on the undercard
Yeah make sure you check the antepost rules mate as we all know Haye has a history of handing in the sick notelittlepug wrote:that result is 5-2 with paddypower, im gonna lump on if I can find out if antepost rules apply to boxingsmiling assassin wrote:Both a couple os shithouses and couldn't care less who wins but Bellew is getting sparked within 3
Naandrew wrote:Same principal as Brook v GGG
Either risk getting smashed against a mandatory for a bit of money or definitely get smashed by a better and bigger fighter for a lot of money
boxingknockout wrote:But, but.....
“This is just a huge, huge fight,” said Eddie Hearn. “One of the best Heavyweights in the world against the best Cruiserweight in the world. An explosion of concussive punchers riddled with bad blood and desperate to score a knockout victory. The build-up will be electric as will fight night, I like millions of fight fans around the world cannot wait!”
fella on the betting thread confirmed they don't apply to boxingsmiling assassin wrote:Yeah make sure you check the antepost rules mate as we all know Haye has a history of handing in the sick notelittlepug wrote:that result is 5-2 with paddypower, im gonna lump on if I can find out if antepost rules apply to boxingsmiling assassin wrote:Both a couple os shithouses and couldn't care less who wins but Bellew is getting sparked within 3
Naandrew wrote:Hearn said that Breidis could fight Huck for the WBC belt. Hell thats better than Bellew cab Breidis
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q2VYWqHHOPc
You only vacate if you're challenging for a world title.DSW wrote:Bellew have to vacate his title?
I don't think he's anywhere close.GPTM1403 wrote:Is Bellew really on the same level as Haye when it comes to punching power, I know he's scored some good stoppages over his career but I've never been convinced he's a destructive puncher at the highest level whereas any time you see Haye fight you get the feeling if he lands decently the other guy is in big trouble. Maybe that is just my reading of it?
5-2 seems a bit of value then mate.littlepug wrote:fella on the betting thread confirmed they don't apply to boxingsmiling assassin wrote:Yeah make sure you check the antepost rules mate as we all know Haye has a history of handing in the sick notelittlepug wrote: that result is 5-2 with paddypower, im gonna lump on if I can find out if antepost rules apply to boxing
isn't it if you win the title at another weight, Brook for example still has his welter titlejamesmcdonnell wrote:You only vacate if you're challenging for a world title.DSW wrote:Bellew have to vacate his title?
Has he bollocks!Horse wrote:Bellew has far more of a chance than Brook did.Naandrew wrote:Same principal as Brook v GGG
Either risk getting smashed against a mandatory for a bit of money or definitely get smashed by a better and bigger fighter for a lot of money
Loftgroov wrote:Just remember in the build up folks, the hate is genuine.
Eddie said so![]()