Haha, totally agree with this post, I also probably over rate Crawford.Tanzio wrote:I agree.littlekinny wrote:I do agree though Molina is a shocking defense.
Crawford is overrated at this point, imo, and I include myself in that criticism. By far his biggest win is Postol, who is essentially the guy that many thought would be stopped by Matthysse. It was a great win but what came immediately before it? Now we get the second best Molina at 140.
Indongo beat the guy who was allegedly next up for Crawford in spectacular fashion. It was a short fight but in that 40 seconds Indongo proved that he is capable of competing. He is long and he showed the capability to use that length. He has pop. He is tall, strong, fast, hungry and undefeated.
Crawford's main claim to fame is beating the guy who beat the guy who was supposed to be the guy to test him. Sounds like Indongo to me.
Give the African his shot.
Im not saying Indongo shouldnt get his shot - hes earned his stripes by beating Troy.
I wanted a bet on Indongo last week as Tryos odds looked ridiculously short for what he had done.
Anyway I looked his record up then scoured the forum for info on him, there was minimal comments and less info.
All I am saying is if no-one knew anything of him before, what forms these solid opinions of him testing Crawford after less than a minute of seeing him? This isnt aimed at you or anyone in particular - just genearl pov.
His record doesnt indicate huge power but all that can be misleading I guess - anyway close to the same page
