Re: Luis Ortiz vs Dave Allen is an 8 rounder
Posted: 09 Dec 2016, 16:39
Allen frustrated the life outta Whyte, this could be a long hard 8 rounds for the viewer to slog through.
Maybe Ortiz's handlers know the score with him and won't match him too highly in anticipation of a big cash out fight for one of the titles .Punchy Joe wrote:Ortiz's carreer is going in reverse, fighting Bryant Jennings and Tony Thompson for the Iterim WBA world title, then Malik Scott for Intercontinental title and now an 8 rounder against Dave Allen. shoudnt it be other way round.
Anyway i hope they feed Dyllian Whyte to Ortiz next year.
No.Punchy Joe wrote:Ortiz's carreer is going in reverse, fighting Bryant Jennings and Tony Thompson for the Iterim WBA world title, then Malik Scott for Intercontinental title and now an 8 rounder against Dave Allen. shoudnt it be other way round.
This process is purely exposure. When Matchroom signed Ortiz, Hearn said that there would be a few fights back to back, one in Monaco, and one in the UK, just to see who he is, get a little exposure, and then they'll target a progression fight. The fight after Allen will be the one to watch, it just depends where they'll go. He's rank number 1 in WBA, which it's likely that Joshua and Klitchko will fight out the super title. Maybe a final eliminator with Briggs? Then the winner meeting Joshua in the summer, or autumn? The paths for Joshua and Ortiz are written, they'll meet at some point in the next 12 months, it's just a case of when.Punchy Joe wrote:Ortiz's carreer is going in reverse, fighting Bryant Jennings and Tony Thompson for the Iterim WBA world title, then Malik Scott for Intercontinental title and now an 8 rounder against Dave Allen. shoudnt it be other way round.
Anyway i hope they feed Dyllian Whyte to Ortiz next year.
It’s just that possibly the best heavyweight in the world is fighting a novice in Dave Allen, a fighter taylor made for Ortiz. Just doesn’t sit right with me that’s all, Allen is durable and could take a heck of a beating.Horse wrote:No.Punchy Joe wrote:Ortiz's carreer is going in reverse, fighting Bryant Jennings and Tony Thompson for the Iterim WBA world title, then Malik Scott for Intercontinental title and now an 8 rounder against Dave Allen. shoudnt it be other way round.
I agree with the principle but Ortiz can't be called possibly the best heavyweight in the world based on last time out.Punchy Joe wrote:It’s just that possibly the best heavyweight in the world is fighting a novice in Dave Allen, a fighter taylor made for Ortiz. Just doesn’t sit right with me that’s all, Allen is durable and could take a heck of a beating.Horse wrote:No.Punchy Joe wrote:Ortiz's carreer is going in reverse, fighting Bryant Jennings and Tony Thompson for the Iterim WBA world title, then Malik Scott for Intercontinental title and now an 8 rounder against Dave Allen. shoudnt it be other way round.
Ortiz couldn't have been called the best Heavyweight in the world regardless because he hasn't done anything to prove it.sharpei_louis wrote:I agree with the principle but Ortiz can't be called possibly the best heavyweight in the world based on last time out.Punchy Joe wrote:It’s just that possibly the best heavyweight in the world is fighting a novice in Dave Allen, a fighter taylor made for Ortiz. Just doesn’t sit right with me that’s all, Allen is durable and could take a heck of a beating.Horse wrote:No.
No, though he could probably beat a lot of them in a Cocaine snorting contest.Horse wrote:Tyson Fury is the best heavyweight in the world.
They keep d*cking around with Luis Ortiz because they want him to get old enough not to be a serious threat to Anthony Joshua.BitPlayer wrote:Does it matter if he's the best or almost the best? The point is a serious world title contender should not be fighting someone both and limited and unexperienced as Dave Allen.
sharpei_louis wrote:I agree with the principle but Ortiz can't be called possibly the best heavyweight in the world based on last time out.Punchy Joe wrote:It’s just that possibly the best heavyweight in the world is fighting a novice in Dave Allen, a fighter taylor made for Ortiz. Just doesn’t sit right with me that’s all, Allen is durable and could take a heck of a beating.Horse wrote:No.
Did you say the same after Tyson-Bonecrusher?sharpei_louis wrote:I agree with the principle but Ortiz can't be called possibly the best heavyweight in the world based on last time out.Punchy Joe wrote:It’s just that possibly the best heavyweight in the world is fighting a novice in Dave Allen, a fighter taylor made for Ortiz. Just doesn’t sit right with me that’s all, Allen is durable and could take a heck of a beating.Horse wrote:No.
No, but that was based on Tyson's reputation, his having blown Berbick away and the lack of others with better claims at being the best heavyweight in the world at that time - I think there are a few around who have better arguments for being #1 than Ortiz.keithmoonhangover wrote:Did you say the same after Tyson-Bonecrusher?sharpei_louis wrote:I agree with the principle but Ortiz can't be called possibly the best heavyweight in the world based on last time out.Punchy Joe wrote:
It’s just that possibly the best heavyweight in the world is fighting a novice in Dave Allen, a fighter taylor made for Ortiz. Just doesn’t sit right with me that’s all, Allen is durable and could take a heck of a beating.
A few?sharpei_louis wrote:No, but that was based on Tyson's reputation, his having blown Berbick away and the lack of others with better claims at being the best heavyweight in the world at that time - I think there are a few around who have better arguments for being #1 than Ortiz.keithmoonhangover wrote:Did you say the same after Tyson-Bonecrusher?sharpei_louis wrote:
I agree with the principle but Ortiz can't be called possibly the best heavyweight in the world based on last time out.
More like a handful.Killer Blow wrote:A few?sharpei_louis wrote:No, but that was based on Tyson's reputation, his having blown Berbick away and the lack of others with better claims at being the best heavyweight in the world at that time - I think there are a few around who have better arguments for being #1 than Ortiz.keithmoonhangover wrote:
Did you say the same after Tyson-Bonecrusher?
No?Horse wrote:No.Punchy Joe wrote:Ortiz's carreer is going in reverse, fighting Bryant Jennings and Tony Thompson for the Iterim WBA world title, then Malik Scott for Intercontinental title and now an 8 rounder against Dave Allen. shoudnt it be other way round.
Enough.Tanzio wrote:More like a handful.Killer Blow wrote:A few?sharpei_louis wrote:
No, but that was based on Tyson's reputation, his having blown Berbick away and the lack of others with better claims at being the best heavyweight in the world at that time - I think there are a few around who have better arguments for being #1 than Ortiz.