Re: Povetkin's Promoter Not Convinced By VADA Test, Explains Doubts
Posted: 20 Dec 2016, 05:43
I take offence to that mateImpractical Poster wrote:European fighters have some rabid fans.
I take offence to that mateImpractical Poster wrote:European fighters have some rabid fans.
montrealsuper wrote:Stiverne got caught cheating with an illegal drug - period - end of discussion
Stop repeating your bullshit about the energy drink.Badhusker wrote:montrealsuper wrote:Stiverne got caught cheating with an illegal drug - period - end of discussion
A 5 hour energy drink (Stiverne) vs taking Ostarine (Povetkin). Pretty much the same, right?
Not accurate, vada don't and never have passed any such punitive measures or allowed folks to 'skate' for a fine or 'donations'. They simply report the test findings from their procedures to the relevant sanctioning body.Kalan wrote:You can't trust VADA.. They admitted they were wrong when they accused Povetkin of testing "adversely" for Meldonium... He didn't... VADA is a rip off of WADA.. They're the keystone cops and they're a group of criminals running a scam.. They cut deals with the WBC to force boxers to take their "voluntary" tests.. Then they tell boxers they're positive for this PED or that, for which they probably have only an allowable trace amount, but let them skate for a fine or "donations" which they can go ahead and fight if it's paid promptly.Badhusker wrote:Explain why they were telling Stiverne Tuesday before the fight if he backs out they already have a replacement. The facts certainly point to team Povetkin already knowing they would test dirty. Wilder and Haymon have nothing to do with Povetkin testing dirty, or Stiverne. Get a grip.montrealsuper wrote: Yes the powers that be desperately want a black american KO machine that they can sell to the public - they are trying to manufacture wilder into a counterfeit super hero via fixing protection and corruption (the Carnera model) - do you really think the ultra greedy al haymon is going to take any chances in blowing up this grand scheme by risking wilder to losing to povetkin or one of his handpicked patsies? Absolutely not - they will do ANYTHING to get rid of povetkin - ANYTHING
Stiverne probably had a negligible amount dimethyamylamine in him.. It's not a stimulant, It's a muscle recovery product.. He said it was in SuperPharm which you take following a strength workout not before sparring to heighten your reactions.. They fined him 75,000 dollars and he has no idea if it was illegal, or if it was a trace amount because the only firm doing the testing is VADA.. but the problem I have is there's hundreds of drugs and substances on the banned list.. If you test positive you should get to go to an accredited lab of your choice with Sample B.. Don't tell the world I'm dirty and fine me 75,000 dollars before Sample B is even tested.. Also VADA could adulterate the sample so another lab finds the exact same result.. I have a problem with privately run testing companies and their quality control.. They can be bribed and bought.. They have an incentive to find dirty tests. They can fudge results so they get their fine money, their "donations" and whatever else they can squeeze out of the boxer.. They can conspire with corrupt promoters, orgs, and fighters to target foreign boxers or any opponent to try to destroy foreign venues and competition.BitPlayer wrote:Anyone bring up Stivern's test is either uninformed or dishonest.
The difference is Stivern tested positive fairly common stinulant, banned for it's health risks. Povetkin tested positive for something similar to anabolic steroids.
Bullcrap.. They're in like Flynn with the WBC.. They're working hand-in-hand with the WBC and corrupt promoters.. They're a band of criminals coordinating with each other.. So they in effect are sharing the proceeds.. They shouldn't be the only lab testing WBC Title Fights.. The boxer should be allowed to select the accredited lab of his choice because VADA lies -- and they issues false findings and reports.. And if they did it before why wouldn't they do it again... Before they're allowed to issue findings Sample B needs to be taken to another lab and tested by honest, competent, and professional technicians.T w_savage wrote:Not accurate, vada don't and never have passed any such punitive measures or allowed folks to 'skate' for a fine or 'donations'. They simply report the test findings from their procedures to the relevant sanctioning body.Kalan wrote:You can't trust VADA.. They admitted they were wrong when they accused Povetkin of testing "adversely" for Meldonium... He didn't... VADA is a rip off of WADA.. They're the keystone cops and they're a group of criminals running a scam.. They cut deals with the WBC to force boxers to take their "voluntary" tests.. Then they tell boxers they're positive for this PED or that, for which they probably have only an allowable trace amount, but let them skate for a fine or "donations" which they can go ahead and fight if it's paid promptly.Badhusker wrote:
Explain why they were telling Stiverne Tuesday before the fight if he backs out they already have a replacement. The facts certainly point to team Povetkin already knowing they would test dirty. Wilder and Haymon have nothing to do with Povetkin testing dirty, or Stiverne. Get a grip.
it's all a conspiracyKalan wrote:Bullcrap.. They're in like Flynn with the WBC.. They're working hand-in-hand with the WBC and corrupt promoters.. They're a band of criminals coordinating with each other.. So they in effect are sharing the proceeds.. They shouldn't be the only lab testing WBC Title Fights.. The boxer should be allowed to select the accredited lab of his choice because VADA lies -- and they issues false findings and reports.. And if they did it before why wouldn't they do it again... Before they're allowed to issue findings Sample B needs to be taken to another lab and tested by honest, competent, and professional technicians.T w_savage wrote:Not accurate, vada don't and never have passed any such punitive measures or allowed folks to 'skate' for a fine or 'donations'. They simply report the test findings from their procedures to the relevant sanctioning body.Kalan wrote:
You can't trust VADA.. They admitted they were wrong when they accused Povetkin of testing "adversely" for Meldonium... He didn't... VADA is a rip off of WADA.. They're the keystone cops and they're a group of criminals running a scam.. They cut deals with the WBC to force boxers to take their "voluntary" tests.. Then they tell boxers they're positive for this PED or that, for which they probably have only an allowable trace amount, but let them skate for a fine or "donations" which they can go ahead and fight if it's paid promptly.
This.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:When did anyone own up to using PED'S
I believe Mosley did.keithmoonhangover wrote:This.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:When did anyone own up to using PED'S
Mosley didn't... He said Victor Conte framed him and he had no idea what was in "the clear" or "the cream" I believe his lawsuit against Conte was settled with non-disclosure agreements about how much Mosley got in the settlement.Badhusker wrote:I believe Mosley did.keithmoonhangover wrote:This.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:When did anyone own up to using PED'S
TRUEKalan wrote:Mosley didn't... He said Victor Conte framed him and he had no idea what was in "the clear" or "the cream" I believe his lawsuit against Conte was settled with non-disclosure agreements about how much Mosley got in the settlement.Badhusker wrote:I believe Mosley did.keithmoonhangover wrote:
This.
Fernando Vargas admitted it... Roy Jones admitted it... Lamont Peterson did, but he said he was naturally anemic in testosterone and that's why he was taking it, not to cheat his opponent... Andre Berto did, but blamed Victor Conte a chief VADA guy for fkking him... Luis Ortiz did, but said it was in the horse meat he ate, because they inject horses with it and he didn't know that... Tarver admitted it, but he said it was an accident... Erik Morales admitted it, but said it all came from contaminated food he ate in a restaurant... Dillian Whyte admitted it, but said it was an accident and nothing he did deliberately... Bute and Browne were both flabbergasted and didn't know how in Hell they tested for Ostarine. They insisted they would never cheat in a million years.
Sure. The banned substances was likely in the roids he took.Kalan wrote:The banned substance WASN'T in any energy drink Stiverne consumed... It was in a "post workout supplement" that he took after a strength Workout.
According to the WBC, Stiverne informed officials that he took a dietary supplement called SUPERPHARM in front of a WBC sample collector in order to “facilitate urination.” Stiverne also admitted to taking it “twice” because the “supplement staff at EOS Gym in Henderson, Nevada recommended it to him,” the WBC said in its statement.Kalan wrote:The banned substance WASN'T in any energy drink Stiverne consumed... It was in a "post workout supplement" that he took after a strength Workout.
And of course WBC believed everything he saidBadhusker wrote:According to the WBC, Stiverne informed officials that he took a dietary supplement called SUPERPHARM in front of a WBC sample collector in order to “facilitate urination.” Stiverne also admitted to taking it “twice” because the “supplement staff at EOS Gym in Henderson, Nevada recommended it to him,” the WBC said in its statement.Kalan wrote:The banned substance WASN'T in any energy drink Stiverne consumed... It was in a "post workout supplement" that he took after a strength Workout.
DMAA is sold currently as a dietary supplement and as an ingredient is various energy preparations. Due to safety concerns, DMAA has been temporarily removed from military stores in the US. Its use has been linked to several reports of serious, life-threatening side effects which appears to be the main reason why the World Anti-Doping Agency added DMAA to its prohibited substances list in 2010.
'He reported the ingestion of that supplement in the declaration of medication use section of the doping control form he filled in connection with the test.'
"There is no evidence that Stiverne intentionally or even knowingly ingested a banned substance with the purpose of enhancing his performance in any fashion. Stiverne's ingestion of DMAA was purely accidental."
Maybe Povetkin should have reported the injestion of ostarine, and the WBC may have went easier on him.
That's interesting. Do you have any kind of proof of this?asdfjkl wrote:Well, it's obvious that Stiverne is using all kinds of doping,
He didn't ingest Ostarine you dumb bunny... All his tests were 100% clean and the "adverse" one probably could easily have come from a test tube that was contaminated with Ostarine... There wasn't a fraction enough Ostarine in Povetkin's system for any possible athletic enhancement... VADA seems to have targeted Povetkin and deliberately contaminated 1 sample because all his others were totally devoid of Ostarine... That just never happens so something underhanded is up with VADA.. The B sample has not been tested yet, but the A and B test come from the same test tube. They are separated and put into separate storage containers in case one testing procedure was done in a faulty manner -- and comes up with a false positive (this happens) so you do another test to confirm or negate the previous result -- but if the sample was adulterated in the first place the both A and B will give a false positive.Badhusker wrote:According to the WBC, Stiverne informed officials that he took a dietary supplement called SUPERPHARM in front of a WBC sample collector in order to “facilitate urination.” Stiverne also admitted to taking it “twice” because the “supplement staff at EOS Gym in Henderson, Nevada recommended it to him,” the WBC said in its statement.Kalan wrote:The banned substance WASN'T in any energy drink Stiverne consumed... It was in a "post workout supplement" that he took after a strength Workout.
DMAA is sold currently as a dietary supplement and as an ingredient is various energy preparations. Due to safety concerns, DMAA has been temporarily removed from military stores in the US. Its use has been linked to several reports of serious, life-threatening side effects which appears to be the main reason why the World Anti-Doping Agency added DMAA to its prohibited substances list in 2010.
'He reported the ingestion of that supplement in the declaration of medication use section of the doping control form he filled in connection with the test.'
"There is no evidence that Stiverne intentionally or even knowingly ingested a banned substance with the purpose of enhancing his performance in any fashion. Stiverne's ingestion of DMAA was purely accidental."
Maybe Povetkin should have reported the injestion of ostarine, and the WBC may have went easier on him.