Page 2 of 4

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 08:26
by ValMar
littlepug wrote:
Unbiased Expert wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Why is it a double standard? Joshua is hardly the ghost of Ali, he's quite stiff and upright himself. I can only assume you mean the double standard is because he's black?

Because Klitschko is even more boring than Ward and Floyd both together and Eastern Europe root for him and hate on those two - while they all are boring . Klitschko is the less skilled of those 3. Jab grab jab grab.
Mate you've got the wrong sport, proper boxing fans don't love or hate fighters like football fans do with their teams, boxing fans don't give a sh!t about geography or race, we like good matchups and good fights and that's it
Littllepug, this is the best short post of the year ! :TU:

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 08:52
by jezzamundo
Stuarty30 wrote:
jezzamundo wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Course he stands a fûckin chance!
At least he is humble.

On that note, I will be changing my name to Well-Endowed Genius.
Nice to meet you mate. My real names Handsome Face Big Cock :oo
Just noticed I quoted the wrong post - oh well, I think I made my point.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 09:32
by montrealsuper
Klitschko fights and beats the best - protected floyd wins fixed in house sparring sessions choreographed and manipulated by his invisible promoter -Big difference - People know Klitschko is the truth while Floyd is a protected fraud who speaks in pre scripted boring sound bites because he knows he's a fraud masquerading around as a great fighter - but true great fighters dont need protection and they dont duck the biggest $ fight in history for six years -

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 09:34
by SaadOffTheDeck
Floyd is retired sweety

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 09:39
by littlepug
ValMar wrote:
littlepug wrote:
Unbiased Expert wrote:

Because Klitschko is even more boring than Ward and Floyd both together and Eastern Europe root for him and hate on those two - while they all are boring . Klitschko is the less skilled of those 3. Jab grab jab grab.
Mate you've got the wrong sport, proper boxing fans don't love or hate fighters like football fans do with their teams, boxing fans don't give a sh!t about geography or race, we like good matchups and good fights and that's it
Littllepug, this is the best short post of the year ! :TU:
Cheers valmar :TU:

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 09:42
by ValMar
littlepug wrote:
ValMar wrote:
littlepug wrote: Mate you've got the wrong sport, proper boxing fans don't love or hate fighters like football fans do with their teams, boxing fans don't give a sh!t about geography or race, we like good matchups and good fights and that's it
Littllepug, this is the best short post of the year ! :TU:
Cheers valmar :TU:
:TU:

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 10:49
by Deadendgeneration
montrealsuper wrote:Klitschko fights and beats the best - protected floyd wins fixed in house sparring sessions choreographed and manipulated by his invisible promoter -Big difference - People know Klitschko is the truth while Floyd is a protected fraud who speaks in pre scripted boring sound bites because he knows he's a fraud masquerading around as a great fighter - but true great fighters dont need protection and they dont duck the biggest $ fight in history for six years -
Speaking of "pre scripted boring sound bites" what has this fight go to do with Floyd?

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 11:05
by Badhusker
Deadendgeneration wrote:
montrealsuper wrote:Klitschko fights and beats the best - protected floyd wins fixed in house sparring sessions choreographed and manipulated by his invisible promoter -Big difference - People know Klitschko is the truth while Floyd is a protected fraud who speaks in pre scripted boring sound bites because he knows he's a fraud masquerading around as a great fighter - but true great fighters dont need protection and they dont duck the biggest $ fight in history for six years -
Speaking of "pre scripted boring sound bites" what has this fight go to do with Floyd?

Basically, judging from his posts, Montrealsuper hates any boxer that is black, from the U.S., or associated with Al Haymon. In Floyd's and Wilder's case, he hit the trifecta. :OhYes:

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 11:27
by Deadendgeneration
Badhusker wrote:
Deadendgeneration wrote:
montrealsuper wrote:Klitschko fights and beats the best - protected floyd wins fixed in house sparring sessions choreographed and manipulated by his invisible promoter -Big difference - People know Klitschko is the truth while Floyd is a protected fraud who speaks in pre scripted boring sound bites because he knows he's a fraud masquerading around as a great fighter - but true great fighters dont need protection and they dont duck the biggest $ fight in history for six years -
Speaking of "pre scripted boring sound bites" what has this fight go to do with Floyd?

Basically, judging from his posts, Montrealsuper hates any boxer that is black, from the U.S., or associated with Al Haymon. In Floyd's and Wilder's case, he hit the trifecta. :OhYes:
At least bringing up Wilder might have had some relevance to a discussion about heavyweight boxers. If he'd said something along the lines of Kilt's level of competition was miles higher than Wilder's then he could have criticised a fighter he doesn't like and stayed within the realms of relevancy.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 11:31
by Badhusker
Deadendgeneration wrote:
Badhusker wrote:
Deadendgeneration wrote:
Speaking of "pre scripted boring sound bites" what has this fight go to do with Floyd?

Basically, judging from his posts, Montrealsuper hates any boxer that is black, from the U.S., or associated with Al Haymon. In Floyd's and Wilder's case, he hit the trifecta. :OhYes:
At least bringing up Wilder might have had some relevance to a discussion about heavyweight boxers. If he'd said something along the lines of Kilt's level of competition was miles higher than Wilder's then he could have criticised a fighter he doesn't like and stayed within the realms of relevancy.
I doubt if he knows what relevancy means. As far as the fight, I think it could be a very good and close fight, depending on which Wlad shows up.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 11:44
by Deadendgeneration
Joshua seems the more sensible call given age/deterioration etc but we really don't know what Wlad has left. At his best he'd have beaten Joshua comfortably in my eyes.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 11:47
by gilgamesh
Klitschko's chance is that often under utilized left hook of his

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 13:52
by jamesmcdonnell
Unbiased Expert wrote:His cheating ilegal wrestling stuff wont be allowed in UK. Klitschko without clinches = KO waiting to happen.

Klitschko will take the biggest beating in his professional career.

Those are facts.¨

How can anyone even root for Klitschko?

Eastern Europe fans hate Floyd and Ward but for some reason they root for this boring robotic wrestling machine against someone like Anthony Joshua.

Those double standars are disgracefull.

Ivan Drago vs Apollo Creed all over again
No mate, those are opinions.

Facts would be proven with evidence, believing something to be true, doesn't make it a fact, you might want to get a dictionary and look the word up.

It's possible Joshua gives him a beating, he's getting Wlad at the right time, but Wlad is vastly more experienced, a very physically imposing man, and dare I say it, is probably even now possessed of better footwork than Joshua.

Joshua looked very ordinary in his last fight, against an opponent who didn't even come to fight, he looked a bit hapless how to deal with him at times.

I say it's an even money fight, I've seen some flaws in Joshua, that Wlad can definitely exploit, if, and it's a big if, he#'s got enough left.

If the fight goes past the first 4, and Wlad has established the jab already, Joshua is in for a very tough night's work, because Wlad judges distance very well, and even though I believe Joshua has the reach advantage, I think Wlad has the better toolkit.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 16:05
by montrealsuper
Who did Klitschko duck? Nobody - Wilder is totally protected or his opponents like Scott are paid to dive - Wilder is a fraud - at least Kltischkos fought and beat the best though Wlad did have a few boring fights -

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 17:50
by davie
montrealsuper wrote:Klitschko fights and beats the best - protected floyd wins fixed in house sparring sessions choreographed and manipulated by his invisible promoter -Big difference - People know Klitschko is the truth while Floyd is a protected fraud who speaks in pre scripted boring sound bites because he knows he's a fraud masquerading around as a great fighter - but true great fighters dont need protection and they dont duck the biggest $ fight in history for six years -

Did I miss something?

What did any of this have to do with Mayweather???

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 24 Dec 2016, 19:09
by Kalan
5burowz wrote:Joshua has to make Wlad pay for that pawing jab. Wlad controls his opponents with that pawing jab making them think too much about what could be coming at them at any second. Joshua has to be confident and just fight within himself and not let Wlad dictate the pace with his pawing jab. Joshua has the skills and abilities to win this fight but does he have the mental edge?
Wlad doesn't paw with his jab.. It's one of the best jabs in Heavyweight History. The feints, setup, footwork, timing, precision, and accuracy of his jab were massively upgraded by 9 or 10 years with Emmanuel Steward. It's one of the reasons he went unbeaten for 11 years. However he's only got a few weapons and had no way deal with Tyson Fury, who's much taller and longer. And when you get in on Wladimir all he can do is grab. Joshua can stay with him from the outside and when he gets inside it's over. I see AJ getting him early, mid-rounds, or late. He'll get the KO.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 25 Dec 2016, 22:45
by MachoTime
Ricky_ wrote:I knew "unbiased expert" was Brut just from his pathetic username. Welcome back, creep.
:lol:

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 26 Dec 2016, 00:27
by bigman1968
Even the greatest boxer cannot beat time. It comes an age to quit!-(

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 26 Dec 2016, 02:42
by Kalan
You always think you can keep doing it, no matter how old you get.. You tend to think everybody is getting older but you.. Hopkins won a major World Title from Pascal at age 46, and unified 2 World Titles at age 49 before losing every round to Kovalev later that year.. Then he wanted Joe Smith at age 51 for whatever reason.. You think, "What's the difference between 49 and 51??? If I could do it at 49 why would it be any harder at 51?"

Well, if you haven't gone through a training camp in 2 years it's going to make a lot of difference. Your legs are not going to come around as quickly, you won't have the same speed and balance, and your reactions won't be sharp... B-Hop lasted longer than anyone else so he called himself The Alien "I'm not human." ... Turned out he was more human than he Thought.

Klitschko looked shopworn versus Jennings, but he could pull the trigger... He looked worse -- actually terrible versus Fury... Why would he look better at 41?

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 26 Dec 2016, 03:46
by ClivePatrickLyons
Joshua is still a work in progress and the jury is still out if we want to be serious about how good he is this will be a good test especially if Wlads still got that drive[hunger] in him that's more the question in my opinion not so much Wlads age the gap in experience between these two is huge and we all know no heavyweight with 18/19 fight's under their belt is anywhere near their prime..........so will it be Experience or Potential I certainly won't be writing off Klitschko but then again I wasn't Wlads biggest fan when he was king he loved fighting in Germany too much and his reign just seemed boring compared to other Great Heavyweight Champion of yesteryear I think and hope Joshua will over come the Experience difference in big fight to win by 8th round TKO :TU:

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 26 Dec 2016, 12:33
by Ilya Muromets
Wlad's pile driver jab will set Joshua up for the KO. Wlad wins easily against the roided up (don't worry Doc Goodman won't find traces of anything in him!) Joshua.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 26 Dec 2016, 15:06
by gregor
It is HW, so I would not say that one fighter stands really "no chance" . Still, I agree Joshua should be favourite.

Wlad has no size advantage, and it is pretty safe to assume at 41 he doesn't have enough speed to make up for it (like against superslow Wach). If he tries to fight him the way he fought his last 20+ opponents, he will be probably losing rounds like he did against Fury... at best.

I would say that taking the risk and trying to KO Joshua is a bit better option, though I am not sure if he is able to change the style that worked for him more than ten years... and with Wlad's chin, it is really risky option anyway. Also, Wlad has no inside game (other then clinching).

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 26 Dec 2016, 16:32
by man
Unbiased Expert wrote:His cheating ilegal wrestling stuff wont be allowed in UK. Klitschko without clinches = KO waiting to happen.

Klitschko will take the biggest beating in his professional career.

Those are facts.¨

How can anyone even root for Klitschko?

Eastern Europe fans hate Floyd and Ward but for some reason they root for this boring robotic wrestling machine against someone like Anthony Joshua.

Those double standars are disgracefull.

Ivan Drago vs Apollo Creed all over again
i disagree with your tone, i agree
with your content.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 26 Dec 2016, 16:44
by HomicideHenry
Unbiased Expert wrote:His cheating ilegal wrestling stuff wont be allowed in UK. Klitschko without clinches = KO waiting to happen.

Klitschko will take the biggest beating in his professional career.

Those are facts.¨

How can anyone even root for Klitschko?

Eastern Europe fans hate Floyd and Ward but for some reason they root for this boring robotic wrestling machine against someone like Anthony Joshua.

Those double standars are disgracefull.

Ivan Drago vs Apollo Creed all over again

Anthony Joshua is nothing more than a hype job. The Brits are buying into his crap like they did David Price. He fights in a straight line, no head movement. All offense, nothing else. He'll be embarassed by Klitschko. Mark my words.

Re: Klitschko stands no chance against Joshua

Posted: 26 Dec 2016, 17:27
by Noxy
Yes he does.