Page 2 of 2
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 07:54
by davie
Horse wrote:davie wrote:Well given Degale and Frampton just leapfrogged him despite not winning then either of them could have been no1 last month, or the month before that. Fury has been inactive for a while.
I only move fighters after they've fought.
DeGale had last fought in April and Frampton had last fought in July.
Fury hadn't been that inactive at that time and neither deserved the top spot back then.
Fair enough, your list your rules
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Despite their recent results, Frampton, Degale and Brook are the 3 beat active fighters in Britain just now, which is why you're list is starting to look that bit better
Brook is nowhere near the other two.
I'd argue that Degale and Brook are on a par pretty much with both a bit below Franmpton
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 06:32
by Horse
Ian1973 wrote:If Fury is still eligible for the list then he should still be number one. How can he be overtaken by someone that has just lost and another that gained a draw and got smashed up?
Doesn't make sense Horse either leave Tyson in or take him out but I don't see how he can fall two places on the back of no-one winning to leapfrog him.
I found a way of doing it.
I think it is accurate.
If Fury wants to stay at No. 1 then he has to fight.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 06:37
by Horse
Switch hitter wrote:Not really had a worthwhile win for years
2014 - Collazo & Alexander
2015 - Algieri
2016 - Alvarez (Lost)
He's not done an incredible amount in the last few years, but those below him generally haven't done a great deal either.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 06:37
by Horse
Kro wrote:He's not 'coming back' you may as well take him out all together,
I think that he will come back.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 06:38
by Horse
davie wrote:I'd argue that Degale and Brook are on a par pretty much with both a bit below Franmpton
It would be nice if Brook could prove it.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 06 Feb 2017, 18:42
by Hammerfox
Pretty good list that. The interesting question is where do you stick haye when he beats bellew.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 06 Feb 2017, 18:51
by Horse
Hammerfox wrote:Pretty good list that. The interesting question is where do you stick haye when he beats bellew.
That would depend on the nature of the victory.
I don't think he'll make it into the top 10 though.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 06 Feb 2017, 19:00
by Hammerfox
Agree Horse. Even a bellew win at the weight wouldn't be a totally credible win
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 06 Feb 2017, 19:01
by Hammerfox
That was a win against bellew
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 06 Feb 2017, 19:02
by Horse
Hammerfox wrote:Agree Horse. Even a bellew win at the weight wouldn't be a totally credible win
At cruiserweight it would be worth far more.
Bellew at heavyweight is possibly not even domestic level.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2017
Posted: 07 Feb 2017, 05:07
by Stuarty
Horse wrote:Switch hitter wrote:Not really had a worthwhile win for years
2014 - Collazo & Alexander
2015 - Algieri
2016 - Alvarez (Lost)
He's not done an incredible amount in the last few years, but those below him generally haven't done a great deal either.
Collazo and Alexander were pretty good wins but were a few years ago.
Algieri was a horrible performance.
Fair play to him for taking the Canelo fight but it was a payday that didn't work out. They shouldn't have been in the same ring.