BoxRec

world ranked wrote:I've never seen a round I couldn't give to someone. That 10-10 round scoring is bollocks.

world ranked wrote:I've never seen a round I couldn't give to someone. That 10-10 round scoring is bollocks.

Stuarty30 wrote:I very seldom sit and write down what I think round for round. I just basically pick who I think was the better at the end of the round and keep score in my head then at the end I'll generally have an opinion on who's won. That's my prerogative as a fan though. I don't have a system I just pick what I like, what I feels working, who's pressuring, who's landed the more eye catching shots? It must be a hard job but some of the score cards we get seem to me to be beyond human error. Some of em are inexcusable.

Lennox wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:I very seldom sit and write down what I think round for round. I just basically pick who I think was the better at the end of the round and keep score in my head then at the end I'll generally have an opinion on who's won. That's my prerogative as a fan though. I don't have a system I just pick what I like, what I feels working, who's pressuring, who's landed the more eye catching shots? It must be a hard job but some of the score cards we get seem to me to be beyond human error. Some of em are inexcusable.

Nothing wrong in that for fun but it is exactly how not to score a fight. YOU need to count and you need to really concentrate on exactly what is effective and what is not. I think if you did that you would get a different result.

fanman wrote:

world ranked wrote:I've never seen a round I couldn't give to someone. That 10-10 round scoring is bollocks.

.... hopkins taylor round 1? .... However i agree, find a winner for each round. Many fights are close and could go either way. If it goes 12 and there isnt dominance then its kind of a draw and just go with the ringside judges, doesnt matter, there can be a rematch.