Page 2 of 2
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 07:22
by davie
PredatorHayds wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:davie wrote:
If Broner is the best the division has to offer, I would argue the opposite
Crawford is a p4p contender, If he steps up to WW, which I'm surprised he hasn't, then it's a pretty dire division
Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.
Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.
Crawford would chew him up and spit him out IMO
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 07:33
by SaadOffTheDeck
davie wrote:PredatorHayds wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:
Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.
Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.
Crawford would chew him up and spit him out IMO
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 08:21
by chiggsy
Tarkus wrote:140 is a good example of what happenes when a strong fighter comes along and cleans up the division. Crawford has noone to fight.
Who's noone?
Is he an irish kid that has gone under the radar?
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 08:23
by Stuarty
PredatorHayds wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:davie wrote:
If Broner is the best the division has to offer, I would argue the opposite
Crawford is a p4p contender, If he steps up to WW, which I'm surprised he hasn't, then it's a pretty dire division
Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.
Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.
Broner v Carwford is a fight that should be made. I think Crawford stops him late. I'm surprised this match hasn't been talked about more on these forums.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 08:24
by Stuarty
davie wrote:PredatorHayds wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:
Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.
Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.
Crawford would chew him up and spit him out IMO
I think he'd stop him late Davie. I really think Crawford is the goods.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 09:18
by Tarkus
chiggsy wrote:Tarkus wrote:140 is a good example of what happenes when a strong fighter comes along and cleans up the division. Crawford has noone to fight.
Who's noone?
Is he an irish kid that has gone under the radar?
Thats Nooney.