Wilder would never fight Ortiz. No money in fighting Ortiz and Ortiz is Top 10. Wilder's too cowardly for that.marvelous marv wrote:Ruiz might be the only guy at Heavy that politically won't fight Wilder as he is with Golden Boy as was Ortiz until very recently. Ortiz-Wilder seems like it will happen this year. Takam is solid, but wasnt ranked by the WBC until recently.
wilder? Who be next?
Re: wilder? Who be next?
-
marvelous marv
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1184
- Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 12:41
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Not even in this scenario?:
Winner of Wlad/Joshua has to fight Pulev IBF or Ortiz WBA as a mandatory. The winner opts for Pulev. Ortiz is left to fight someone for a vacant WBA belt. That someone is not Briggs/Oquendo as they have to fight Ustinov next.
Winner of Wlad/Joshua has to fight Pulev IBF or Ortiz WBA as a mandatory. The winner opts for Pulev. Ortiz is left to fight someone for a vacant WBA belt. That someone is not Briggs/Oquendo as they have to fight Ustinov next.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
He wouldn't fight Ortiz under any circumstances.marvelous marv wrote:Not even in this scenario?:
Winner of Wlad/Joshua has to fight Pulev IBF or Ortiz WBA as a mandatory. The winner opts for Pulev. Ortiz is left to fight someone for a vacant WBA belt. That someone is not Briggs/Oquendo as they have to fight Ustinov next.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Sure he would.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
i think princ charles martin 
Re: wilder? Who be next?
What leads you to believe that?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Sure he would.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I know you're kidding, but you're actually probably right. He'd sooner fight Martin than he would Ortiz.stellar wrote:i think princ charles martin
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I think he's ready and willing to fight all of them. he proved that to me by signing to fight Povetkin in Russia. The struggles of the PBC don't do him any favors for opponents either. We all have weak spots with fighters we hate. Wilder is yours.gilgamesh wrote:What leads you to believe that?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Sure he would.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I just don't understand why he's constantly given the benefit of the doubt that he's willing to fight good fighters when it's been over 2 years and he hasn't fought a single Top 10 opponent. It's like I'm the only one who acknowledges what he's ACTUALLY doing instead of what he might do.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think he's ready and willing to fight all of them. he proved that to me by signing to fight Povetkin in Russia. The struggles of the PBC don't do him any favors for opponents either. We all have weak spots with fighters we hate. Wilder is yours.gilgamesh wrote:What leads you to believe that?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Sure he would.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: wilder? Who be next?
WBC will rank anybody suggested by Haymon. That has already happened.marvelous marv wrote:Ruiz might be the only guy at Heavy that politically won't fight Wilder as he is with Golden Boy as was Ortiz until very recently. Ortiz-Wilder seems like it will happen this year. Takam is solid, but wasnt ranked by the WBC until recently.
-
marvelous marv
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1184
- Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 12:41
Re: wilder? Who be next?
stop with the ridiculous conspiracy theoriesboxing_rocks wrote:WBC will rank anybody suggested by Haymon. That has already happened.marvelous marv wrote:Ruiz might be the only guy at Heavy that politically won't fight Wilder as he is with Golden Boy as was Ortiz until very recently. Ortiz-Wilder seems like it will happen this year. Takam is solid, but wasnt ranked by the WBC until recently.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
You don't need a conspiracy theory to know that Wilder's next opponent will be somebody not ranked Top 10. At least not by any respectable rankings organization.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
There is a difference between the benefit of the doubt and not giving an ounce of credence to legitimate circumstances. He certainly isn't a coward.gilgamesh wrote:I just don't understand why he's constantly given the benefit of the doubt that he's willing to fight good fighters when it's been over 2 years and he hasn't fought a single Top 10 opponent. It's like I'm the only one who acknowledges what he's ACTUALLY doing instead of what he might do.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think he's ready and willing to fight all of them. he proved that to me by signing to fight Povetkin in Russia. The struggles of the PBC don't do him any favors for opponents either. We all have weak spots with fighters we hate. Wilder is yours.gilgamesh wrote:
What leads you to believe that?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I'd take that bet.gilgamesh wrote:You don't need a conspiracy theory to know that Wilder's next opponent will be somebody not ranked Top 10. At least not by any respectable rankings organization.
-
marvelous marv
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1184
- Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 12:41
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Arreola was WBC 9 when they fought. But that wasnt a fight I cared for much.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Like I said. He won't be ranked by any RESPECTABLE rankings organization. The WBC and indeed all other title organizations rankings are bought and sold. They have no credibility.marvelous marv wrote:Arreola was WBC 9 when they fought. But that wasnt a fight I cared for much.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
What credence is there to give? I'm not talking about Povetkin. I'm talking about the fact that he's 5 title defenses deep and hasn't fought a single deserving contender.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:There is a difference between the benefit of the doubt and not giving an ounce of credence to legitimate circumstances. He certainly isn't a coward.gilgamesh wrote:I just don't understand why he's constantly given the benefit of the doubt that he's willing to fight good fighters when it's been over 2 years and he hasn't fought a single Top 10 opponent. It's like I'm the only one who acknowledges what he's ACTUALLY doing instead of what he might do.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
I think he's ready and willing to fight all of them. he proved that to me by signing to fight Povetkin in Russia. The struggles of the PBC don't do him any favors for opponents either. We all have weak spots with fighters we hate. Wilder is yours.
The Povetkin situation didn't hold him up for 5 f*cking fights. Don't give me that sh*t.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I'd be happy to take your money too. Too bad we don't live near each other. It'd be a nice bet between friends.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I'd take that bet.gilgamesh wrote:You don't need a conspiracy theory to know that Wilder's next opponent will be somebody not ranked Top 10. At least not by any respectable rankings organization.
-
dickbelden
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 767
- Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45
Re: wilder? Who be next?
winner of chisora vs helenius ! http://www.boxingnews24.com/2017/04/chi ... sion-news/
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I trust you. $10. He's going to fight Parker.gilgamesh wrote:I'd be happy to take your money too. Too bad we don't live near each other. It'd be a nice bet between friends.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I'd take that bet.gilgamesh wrote:You don't need a conspiracy theory to know that Wilder's next opponent will be somebody not ranked Top 10. At least not by any respectable rankings organization.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Lolgilgamesh wrote:What credence is there to give? I'm not talking about Povetkin. I'm talking about the fact that he's 5 title defenses deep and hasn't fought a single deserving contender.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:There is a difference between the benefit of the doubt and not giving an ounce of credence to legitimate circumstances. He certainly isn't a coward.gilgamesh wrote:
I just don't understand why he's constantly given the benefit of the doubt that he's willing to fight good fighters when it's been over 2 years and he hasn't fought a single Top 10 opponent. It's like I'm the only one who acknowledges what he's ACTUALLY doing instead of what he might do.
The Povetkin situation didn't hold him up for 5 f*cking fights. Don't give me that sh*t.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
You're on...but I'll only pay out if the fight actually goes down. Doesn't have to be Parker either. It can be anybody ranked in the Top 10 by a respectable Rankings organization. Meaning The Ring or TBRB.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I trust you. $10. He's going to fight Parker.gilgamesh wrote:I'd be happy to take your money too. Too bad we don't live near each other. It'd be a nice bet between friends.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: I'd take that bet.
We could also use The13thround's rankings, but since I'm one of the people that contributes to those you probably wouldn't want to do that. Understandably so
This is a win-win for me actually as I'd be fine with being wrong because it would mean Wilder finally fought a challenger with a pulse.
Last edited by gilgamesh on 19 Apr 2017, 17:09, edited 1 time in total.
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Out of curiosity, whose rankings do you consider respectable?gilgamesh wrote:Like I said. He won't be ranked by any RESPECTABLE rankings organization. The WBC and indeed all other title organizations rankings are bought and sold. They have no credibility.marvelous marv wrote:Arreola was WBC 9 when they fought. But that wasnt a fight I cared for much.
BTW, you are way off in thinking Wilder is a coward. He has had some soft touches since his championship win. Some of those due to unfortunate circumstances. But, I think the softness of his opponents has been blown out of proportion. I don't believe you were a fan of his even before his title win (correct me if I'm wrong). But if that's the case, it's only natural that you would be a skeptic of his now as well.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I was never a fan of Wilder, but I never had anything against him until he won the title and has ducked ALL Top 10 opponents since doing so.Impractical Poster wrote:Out of curiosity, whose rankings do you consider respectable?gilgamesh wrote:Like I said. He won't be ranked by any RESPECTABLE rankings organization. The WBC and indeed all other title organizations rankings are bought and sold. They have no credibility.marvelous marv wrote:Arreola was WBC 9 when they fought. But that wasnt a fight I cared for much.
BTW, you are way off in thinking Wilder is a coward. He has had some soft touches since his championship win. Some of those due to unfortunate circumstances. But, I think the softness of his opponents has been blown out of proportion. I don't believe you were a fan of his even before his title win (correct me if I'm wrong). But if that's the case, it's only natural that you would be a skeptic of his now as well.
I've edited my above post to answer your question about who has respectable rankings.
A great deal of my criticism of Wilder would cease if he'd fight credible opponents. When I first started following the sport I sh*t on Roy Jones hard for the opposition he fought, but I respected him after fighting Tarver twice in a row. Win or Lose a fighter usually has my respect if he's willing to fight the best available contenders, and a fighter easily earns my disdain by NOT fighting the best available contenders. At least when they're a titleholder.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I agree, his matchmaking is better than vitalis was.