BoxRec

Absolute dog sh1te she doesnt even look interested at all,how can she ask questions and not even care about the answer or even have an opinion on it. Fvckin sh1t

banjo wrote:Lovely eye candy.

She isnt all that

Prefer Charlie Webster myself.

She is a right treacle and more to the point understands boxing.

LancashireLoyal wrote:She talks over ringwalks which pisses me off.Whether she's been told to do this or not i dont know but she seems to just carry on waffling sh it right up until the fighters are getting announced

That seems to be the done thing at Sky. Adam Smith and Jim Watt used to talk dribble over the ring walks too. Drives me nuts. Their boxing coverage is getting worse if you ask me - Froch, Bellew, Nelson, Paul Smith - all afraid to give a proper opinion or to call a fight properly. Just yes men following a script. As for Adam Smith and his overused boxing cliches, don't get me started. The man loves himself.

I think she does a good job.

Just watched the countdown show on Sky and for me she's getting fvcking worse. More and more ridiculous "comedy" moments about Paulie being old, Johnny losing his pro debut etc

What the fvck is wrong with Sky. It's not a fvcking game show it's a serious sport. I don't tune into a comedy show expecting regular interruptions of boring political discourse and similarly I don't tune into a boxing show expecting regular interruptions of sh1te humour.

Who the fvck is this coverage aimed at ?? Who's responsible for it ? The contrast between Sky's pantomime bollocks and BT Sport's professional, informative coverage is massive.

And I've gotta pay £18 to listen to this pudendum on Saturday night. Fvcking hell.

I'd throw one right up her dung hatch

Stuarty30 wrote:I'd throw one right up her dung hatch

I usually dislike the token female presenter but Anna Woolhouse and Charlie Webster are both knowledgeable IMO.

Anna Woodhouse is gorgeous. And I like her glasses.

Crease wrote:Anna Woodhouse is gorgeous. And I like her glasses.

Me too, I'd like to clean them.

CaptainSpacerod wrote:She's fvcking terrible.

Virtually every link is sprinkled with inane jokes and needless fake laughs that we don't get when Ed or Adam are doing it. Boxing, or any top level sport for that matter, isn't light entertainment - it's serious business for the protagonists and the fans yet this lightweight reduces it to the level of an Ant n Dec show.

The contrast between Sky's dumbing down and BT Sport's entry into the market with a team of serious, highly professional presenters and pundits has been noticeable.

Wouldn't kick her out of bed though.

ILikeBeer wrote:

Wouldn't kick her out of bed though.

Not during the act perhaps but as soon as she started critiquing my performance she'd be gone.

But enough about my insecurities

That Leanne Johnson is quite something. Always expect her to do this:

Deno1986 wrote:

LancashireLoyal wrote:She talks over ringwalks which pisses me off.Whether she's been told to do this or not i dont know but she seems to just carry on waffling sh it right up until the fighters are getting announced

That seems to be the done thing at Sky. Adam Smith and Jim Watt used to talk dribble over the ring walks too. Drives me nuts. Their boxing coverage is getting worse if you ask me - Froch, Bellew, Nelson, Paul Smith - all afraid to give a proper opinion or to call a fight properly. Just yes men following a script. As for Adam Smith and his overused boxing cliches, don't get me started. The man loves himself.

I agree but then at the same time I'm not into ringwalks as normally it's the fighter walking to the ring backed by some generic rap shite blaring away in the background, talk over that for sure but don't talk over Carl Froch coming into the ring to AC/DC.

jaymitch81 wrote:Prefer Charlie Webster myself.

She is a right treacle and more to the point understands boxing.

x2
We all like eye-candy but not if she (or he?) doesn't know her stuff.

Woolhouse is a good presenter, but Charlie Webster knows her stuff and loves boxing - puts her in a different league.

Eye candy is everywhere....just do some googling (or pornhubing) on your phone while you watch.

I'd much rather have an ugly female commentator who knows her stuff and does a good job...

I'd rather they just had a commentator and a co-commentator, they can do the talking to the cameras bits too, how much does it cost to have all those people ringside like Carl 'Chisora should win because I've never heard of the other guy' Froch, surely the budget can be better spent.

banjo wrote:I'd rather they just had a commentator and a co-commentator, they can do the talking to the cameras bits too, how much does it cost to have all those people ringside like Carl 'Chisora should win because I've never heard of the other guy' Froch, surely the budget can be better spent.

Spot on

Whats a dung hatch ?

It's a same Anna didn't get the legs out last night.
She has a lovely set of pins.

I didn't think she was too bad actually. She's no Paul Dempsey obviously, but did a reasonable job of keeping things moving. She seems more knowledgeable than Froch, although that's not hard.

nobleart1978 wrote:Whats a dung hatch ?

P00 Shute

Might as well put it up the poo shute. You only live once.

Woolhouse is a far better presenter than Webster. I used to watch Webster do speedway and I thought she was awful. I don't deny Webster probably knows more about boxing than Woolhouse but Woolhouse is much more comfortable in front of the camera, at times Webster's on screen performance is cringeworthy and awkward.
Regarding the merits of each woman's rodability, again Woolhouse by a country mile for me...