BoxRec

In the know 85 wrote:Errol spence jr.. My bet of the year...

How do you all feel now??? Daft thread??? How about bang on the money bitches

Prior to last night, neither Spence Jr. nor Brook had competed in a bout during 2017. In fact, both fighters had been inactive for roughly nine months.

Before Spence Jr's victory last night, only 15% of the 54 boxing experts polled thought that Kell Brook stood a chance at successfully defending his IBF world title.

A few days prior to last night's fight, the vast majority of the bookmakers listed by Oddschecker rated Errol Spence Jr. as being more than 70% certain to beat Kell Brook.

It also appeared that the majory of this forum favoured the American to emerge victorious from last night's fight.

Therefore, please remind me what you've done that deserves a proverbial pat of the back from the BoxRec forum community?

Enlightened-One wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:Errol spence jr.. My bet of the year...

How do you all feel now??? Daft thread??? How about bang on the money bitches

Prior to last night, neither Spence Jr. nor Brook had competed in a bout during 2017. In fact, both fighters had been inactive for roughly nine months.

Before Spence Jr's victory last night, only 15% of the 54 boxing experts polled thought that Kell Brook stood a chance at successfully defending his IBF world title.

A few days prior to last night's fight, the vast majority of the bookmakers listed by Oddschecker rated Errol Spence Jr. as being more than 70% certain to beat Kell Brook.

It also appeared that the majory of this forum favoured the American to emerge victorious from last night's fight.

Therefore, please remind me what you've done that deserves a proverbial pat of the back from the BoxRec forum community?

You can jump on the band wagon now mate
But there's no way everybody thought spence would win on here.. no effing chance.. they were all shouting brook by ko and chocolate brownies.. I have written several posts on here predicting spences future.. months before this fight was even announced.. have a read of them before you pipe up

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:Errol spence jr.. My bet of the year...

How do you all feel now??? Daft thread??? How about bang on the money bitches

Prior to last night, neither Spence Jr. nor Brook had competed in a bout during 2017. In fact, both fighters had been inactive for roughly nine months.

Before Spence Jr's victory last night, only 15% of the 54 boxing experts polled thought that Kell Brook stood a chance at successfully defending his IBF world title.

A few days prior to last night's fight, the vast majority of the bookmakers listed by Oddschecker rated Errol Spence Jr. as being more than 70% certain to beat Kell Brook.

It also appeared that the majory of this forum favoured the American to emerge victorious from last night's fight.

Therefore, please remind me what you've done that deserves a proverbial pat of the back from the BoxRec forum community?

You can jump on the band wagon now mate
But there's no way everybody thought spence would win on here.. no effing chance.. they were all shouting brook by ko and chocolate brownies.. I have written several posts on here predicting spences future.. months before this fight was even announced.. have a read of them before you pipe up

Check my posting history. What I told you in this post was something that I clearly articulated before the fight.

In fact, there's not a single person on this forum that attempted to supply the stats I did.

Enlightened-One wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Prior to last night, neither Spence Jr. nor Brook had competed in a bout during 2017. In fact, both fighters had been inactive for roughly nine months.

Before Spence Jr's victory last night, only 15% of the 54 boxing experts polled thought that Kell Brook stood a chance at successfully defending his IBF world title.

A few days prior to last night's fight, the vast majority of the bookmakers listed by Oddschecker rated Errol Spence Jr. as being more than 70% certain to beat Kell Brook.

It also appeared that the majory of this forum favoured the American to emerge victorious from last night's fight.

Therefore, please remind me what you've done that deserves a proverbial pat of the back from the BoxRec forum community?

You can jump on the band wagon now mate
But there's no way everybody thought spence would win on here.. no effing chance.. they were all shouting brook by ko and chocolate brownies.. I have written several posts on here predicting spences future.. months before this fight was even announced.. have a read of them before you pipe up

Check my posting history. What I told you in this post was something that I clearly articulated before the fight.

In fact, there's not a single person on this forum that attempted to supply the stats I did.

So what exactly are you piping up about?? Someone who has the same view as you?? I've been talking about spence for about 3 and a half years.. trying to convince people he is the real deal, and I can't see anyone that can beat him.. I also said he'd beat brook by late stoppage or a couple of rounds comfortably in another topic on here in fact the same topic that had most people picking brook by comfortable points or by stoppage.

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:
You can jump on the band wagon now mate
But there's no way everybody thought spence would win on here.. no effing chance.. they were all shouting brook by ko and chocolate brownies.. I have written several posts on here predicting spences future.. months before this fight was even announced.. have a read of them before you pipe up

Check my posting history. What I told you in this post was something that I clearly articulated before the fight.

In fact, there's not a single person on this forum that attempted to supply the stats I did.

So what exactly are you piping up about?? Someone who has the same view as you?? I've been talking about spence for about 3 and a half years.. trying to convince people he is the real deal, and I can't see anyone that can beat him.. I also said he'd beat brook by late stoppage or a couple of rounds comfortably in another topic on here in fact the same topic that had most people picking brook by comfortable points or by stoppage.

Whilst we both predicted the outcome of the fight, it was also predicted by nearly all the boxing experts and also the bookmakers.

The outcome of the fight was very predictable in nature and making a successful prediction on this occasion is not worth boasting about.

Enlightened-One wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Check my posting history. What I told you in this post was something that I clearly articulated before the fight.

In fact, there's not a single person on this forum that attempted to supply the stats I did.

So what exactly are you piping up about?? Someone who has the same view as you?? I've been talking about spence for about 3 and a half years.. trying to convince people he is the real deal, and I can't see anyone that can beat him.. I also said he'd beat brook by late stoppage or a couple of rounds comfortably in another topic on here in fact the same topic that had most people picking brook by comfortable points or by stoppage.

Whilst we both predicted the outcome of the fight, it was also predicted by nearly all the boxing experts and also the bookmakers.

The outcome of the fight was very predictable in nature and making a successful prediction on this occasion is not worth boasting about.

My prediction was about 2 years earlier than your "experts" way before spence was proven at all.. I said then that he'd go unbeaten at ww and probably up to middleweight.. and on march 29th of this year "when I should have unloaded the cash" brook was 8/15 and spence was 6/4.. funny how things change I.e people's opinions when the bookies finally get it right

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:
So what exactly are you piping up about?? Someone who has the same view as you?? I've been talking about spence for about 3 and a half years.. trying to convince people he is the real deal, and I can't see anyone that can beat him.. I also said he'd beat brook by late stoppage or a couple of rounds comfortably in another topic on here in fact the same topic that had most people picking brook by comfortable points or by stoppage.

Whilst we both predicted the outcome of the fight, it was also predicted by nearly all the boxing experts and also the bookmakers.

The outcome of the fight was very predictable in nature and making a successful prediction on this occasion is not worth boasting about.

My prediction was about 2 years earlier than your "experts" way before spence was proven at all.. I said then that he'd go unbeaten at ww and probably up to middleweight.. and on march 29th of this year "when I should have unloaded the cash" brook was 8/15 and spence was 6/4.. funny how things change I.e people's opinions when the bookies finally get it right

It's a shame you didn't articulate this opinion to the forum at least two years ago, isn't it?

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:
So what exactly are you piping up about?? Someone who has the same view as you?? I've been talking about spence for about 3 and a half years.. trying to convince people he is the real deal, and I can't see anyone that can beat him.. I also said he'd beat brook by late stoppage or a couple of rounds comfortably in another topic on here in fact the same topic that had most people picking brook by comfortable points or by stoppage.

Whilst we both predicted the outcome of the fight, it was also predicted by nearly all the boxing experts and also the bookmakers.

The outcome of the fight was very predictable in nature and making a successful prediction on this occasion is not worth boasting about.

My prediction was about 2 years earlier than your "experts" way before spence was proven at all.. I said then that he'd go unbeaten at ww and probably up to middleweight.. and on march 29th of this year "when I should have unloaded the cash" brook was 8/15 and spence was 6/4.. funny how things change I.e people's opinions when the bookies finally get it right

You want an award?

Spence was the only American to have medalled during his Olympic year. Of course people were expecting great things from him in the pros. Not just because he placed in the Olympics, but his style was fit for the pro ranks as well. Stop acting like you pulled something out of your ass here that no one else saw coming. Saad has known about Spence most likely a lot longer than you and has been praising him for quite a while. You don't see him parading around forums acting like an all knowing asshole.... well, not on the Spence topic anyhow.

Impractical Poster wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Whilst we both predicted the outcome of the fight, it was also predicted by nearly all the boxing experts and also the bookmakers.

The outcome of the fight was very predictable in nature and making a successful prediction on this occasion is not worth boasting about.

My prediction was about 2 years earlier than your "experts" way before spence was proven at all.. I said then that he'd go unbeaten at ww and probably up to middleweight.. and on march 29th of this year "when I should have unloaded the cash" brook was 8/15 and spence was 6/4.. funny how things change I.e people's opinions when the bookies finally get it right

You want an award?

Spence was the only American to have medalled during his Olympic year. Of course people were expecting great things from him in the pros. Not just because he placed in the Olympics, but his style was fit for the pro ranks as well. Stop acting like you pulled something out of your ass here that no one else saw coming. Saad has known about Spence most likely a lot longer than you and has been praising him for quite a while. You don't see him parading around forums acting like an all knowing asshole.... well, not on the Spence topic anyhow.

Yeah in the know is a clear asshole

However didn't spence get knocked out the Olympic spirit before the medal rounds? 1/4er finals I understood

Ossyrules wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:
My prediction was about 2 years earlier than your "experts" way before spence was proven at all.. I said then that he'd go unbeaten at ww and probably up to middleweight.. and on march 29th of this year "when I should have unloaded the cash" brook was 8/15 and spence was 6/4.. funny how things change I.e people's opinions when the bookies finally get it right

You want an award?

Spence was the only American to have medalled during his Olympic year. Of course people were expecting great things from him in the pros. Not just because he placed in the Olympics, but his style was fit for the pro ranks as well. Stop acting like you pulled something out of your ass here that no one else saw coming. Saad has known about Spence most likely a lot longer than you and has been praising him for quite a while. You don't see him parading around forums acting like an all knowing asshole.... well, not on the Spence topic anyhow.

Yeah in the know is a clear asshole

However didn't spence get knocked out the Olympic spirit before the medal rounds? 1/4er finals I understood

You are probably correct. It's been a while. Either he was the only one to medal or he was the American that made it the furthest. Probably the latter.

I remember watching him during the Olympics and thinking how suited his style was for the pro ranks.

Enlightened-One wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Whilst we both predicted the outcome of the fight, it was also predicted by nearly all the boxing experts and also the bookmakers.

The outcome of the fight was very predictable in nature and making a successful prediction on this occasion is not worth boasting about.

My prediction was about 2 years earlier than your "experts" way before spence was proven at all.. I said then that he'd go unbeaten at ww and probably up to middleweight.. and on march 29th of this year "when I should have unloaded the cash" brook was 8/15 and spence was 6/4.. funny how things change I.e people's opinions when the bookies finally get it right

It's a shame you didn't articulate this opinion to the forum at least two years ago, isn't it?

I did.. then was removed by a bitch who got out of his pram ran and told the teacher because he couldn't have an argument like an adult.. I also had an agreement with two bloggers, 1 Keith thurman fan, and 1 kell brook fan, a £1000 pound wager with both of them should either fighter fight spence.. an independent betting account set up for a one off bet with either. All agreed over 18 months ago spoiled by a grass

Impractical Poster wrote:

In the know 85 wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Whilst we both predicted the outcome of the fight, it was also predicted by nearly all the boxing experts and also the bookmakers.

The outcome of the fight was very predictable in nature and making a successful prediction on this occasion is not worth boasting about.

My prediction was about 2 years earlier than your "experts" way before spence was proven at all.. I said then that he'd go unbeaten at ww and probably up to middleweight.. and on march 29th of this year "when I should have unloaded the cash" brook was 8/15 and spence was 6/4.. funny how things change I.e people's opinions when the bookies finally get it right

You want an award?

Spence was the only American to have medalled during his Olympic year. Of course people were expecting great things from him in the pros. Not just because he placed in the Olympics, but his style was fit for the pro ranks as well. Stop acting like you pulled something out of your ass here that no one else saw coming. Saad has known about Spence most likely a lot longer than you and has been praising him for quite a while. You don't see him parading around forums acting like an all knowing asshole.... well, not on the Spence topic anyhow.

Your clearly a fornicating retard mate.. spence won nothing at the Olympics you div.. what medal did he win?? Bunch of clowns you lot.. jumping on a retarded band wagon is nothing to be proud of mate.. the fact brook was odds on for a month after the fight was announced means that spence was in the start an outsider you clowns.. bunch of after the fact fools.. who asked for an award you fornicating idiot??? I just said it was my bet of the year and you all start crying