BoxRec

Enlightened-One wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: What makes you say that? Are you saying that he "behaves like a rapist"?

Comon man! How surprised would you be if it turned out to be true?

The dude has been filmed in porn. Beat some dude up and stole his money at a bowling alley. Dude is prime for this type of press. Not saying he did it, bur I definitely wouldn't be surprised if he had.

I prefer to assume innocence until guilt has been proven, especially considering the news has been leaked from an unreliable source.

None of the reasons you've cited justify your assumption about Broner "possibly" being a rapist. There is no evidence to justify your suspicions.

Even if Broner is ultimately proven by law to be a rapist, I have still adopted the correct mindset, because I exist in an evidence-based reality, whereby extreme accusations require irrefutable proof before they are worthy of consideration.

Put it this way, if you were accused of an equally severe crime as the one that Broner has been alleged as committing, would you want the jury to be like me or as presumptuous and as biased as you?

Enlightened-One wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: What makes you say that? Are you saying that he "behaves like a rapist"?

Comon man! How surprised would you be if it turned out to be true?

The dude has been filmed in porn. Beat some dude up and stole his money at a bowling alley. Dude is prime for this type of press. Not saying he did it, bur I definitely wouldn't be surprised if he had.

I prefer to assume innocence until guilt has been proven, especially considering the news has been leaked from an unreliable source.

None of the reasons you've cited justify your assumption about Broner "possibly" being a rapist. There is no evidence to justify your suspicions.

Even if Broner is ultimately proven by law to be a rapist, I have still adopted the correct mindset, because I exist in an evidence-based reality, whereby extreme accusations require irrefutable proof before they are worthy of consideration.

Put it this way, if you were accused of an equally severe crime as the one that Broner has been alleged as committing, would you want the jury to be like me or as presumptuous and as biased as you?

clopixolacuphase wrote:Is Enlightened One Fugmo?

Impractical Poster wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote: Comon man! How surprised would you be if it turned out to be true?

The dude has been filmed in porn. Beat some dude up and stole his money at a bowling alley. Dude is prime for this type of press. Not saying he did it, bur I definitely wouldn't be surprised if he had.

I prefer to assume innocence until guilt has been proven, especially considering the news has been leaked from an unreliable source.

None of the reasons you've cited justify your assumption about Broner "possibly" being a rapist. There is no evidence to justify your suspicions.

Even if Broner is ultimately proven by law to be a rapist, I have still adopted the correct mindset, because I exist in an evidence-based reality, whereby extreme accusations require irrefutable proof before they are worthy of consideration.

Put it this way, if you were accused of an equally severe crime as the one that Broner has been alleged as committing, would you want the jury to be like me or as presumptuous and as biased as you?

But would you be surprised?

Enlightened-One wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: I prefer to assume innocence until guilt has been proven, especially considering the news has been leaked from an unreliable source.

None of the reasons you've cited justify your assumption about Broner "possibly" being a rapist. There is no evidence to justify your suspicions.

Even if Broner is ultimately proven by law to be a rapist, I have still adopted the correct mindset, because I exist in an evidence-based reality, whereby extreme accusations require irrefutable proof before they are worthy of consideration.

Put it this way, if you were accused of an equally severe crime as the one that Broner has been alleged as committing, would you want the jury to be like me or as presumptuous and as biased as you?

But would you be surprised?

Yes I would be surprised.

Adrien Broner's media alias should be referred to as "thrush", because he's an irritating tŵàt, but that doesn't necessarily mean that he's capable of committing such a hideous crime.

Personally-speaking, I prefer to assume innocence until we know for certain that he's guilty.

Impractical Poster wrote:Broner makes it wat too easy for people to drag through the mud.

Freedom2013 wrote:According to multiple sources. It's being discussed on internet forums such as BS, but there is yet to be a boxing media article about it.

http://www.hip-hopvibe.com/2017/06/09/a ... hat-photo/

https://www.olisa.tv/2017/06/boxer-adri ... ery-woman/

http://straightfromthea.com/2017/06/09/ ... ram-model/

sykessta wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:
But would you be surprised?

Yes I would be surprised.

Adrien Broner's media alias should be referred to as "thrush", because he's an irritating tŵàt, but that doesn't necessarily mean that he's capable of committing such a hideous crime.

Personally-speaking, I prefer to assume innocence until we know for certain that he's guilty.

I never said i believed it. Im just saying given his track record with the law and the way he acts makes people take an accusation more seriously than if say a guy like pacquiao or timothy bradley was accused. And the thing is alot of these guys that you would least expect it are the ones doing the most fvcked up crimes. Look at bill Cosby. Kids looked up to him and everybody was shocked when the allegations came out. Now I'm not saying broner did it or that i believe it at all but his antics amd the way he portrays himself makes him a prime target for someone trying to make a money grab.

caldo2025 wrote:

sykessta wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Yes I would be surprised.

Adrien Broner's media alias should be referred to as "thrush", because he's an irritating tŵàt, but that doesn't necessarily mean that he's capable of committing such a hideous crime.

Personally-speaking, I prefer to assume innocence until we know for certain that he's guilty.

I never said i believed it. Im just saying given his track record with the law and the way he acts makes people take an accusation more seriously than if say a guy like pacquiao or timothy bradley was accused. And the thing is alot of these guys that you would least expect it are the ones doing the most fvcked up crimes. Look at bill Cosby. Kids looked up to him and everybody was shocked when the allegations came out. Now I'm not saying broner did it or that i believe it at all but his antics amd the way he portrays himself makes him a prime target for someone trying to make a money grab.

Somehow Broner took some pics of the young lady in the act and some one tweeted them out yesterday. Let's just say that the woman looked to be a VERY willing participant and very proud of her mouth and what she could do it with it. I'm not posting a link to that filth but check it out on Twitter if you want.

The kid is just a beacon for this stuff now and he doesn't have the intelligence to keep his nose clean and weed out the poisonous people that can take him down and put him away. It's bound to happen to him and it's pretty sad to me because he's obviously dealing with some demons in his head.