BoxRec

Tanzio wrote:

ValMar wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: You're right, nice milf

Very, very nice....I would not call her a milf, she is too young.....

She's a mother, Dutch oven brain would like to fvck her. What part of milf do you not understand?

I did not know she was a mother, she looks so young, and hot, of course........

Mexi-Box wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I gotta give credit where it's due. Mexi-bros is frequently wrong, but this was a great rbr. Well done man.

I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.

Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.

And she's 34, how long am I supposed to wait?

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I gotta give credit where it's due. Mexi-bros is frequently wrong, but this was a great rbr. Well done man.

I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.

Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.

You're wrong, SaadOffTheDeck is by far the one who got things wrong most often.

asdfjkl wrote:And she's 34, how long am I supposed to wait?

Unfortunately, I am too old.

asdfjkl wrote:

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote: I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.

Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.

You're wrong, SaadOffTheDeck is by far the one who got things wrong most often.

You just keep adding to your lead, Dutch oven brain.

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I gotta give credit where it's due. Mexi-bros is frequently wrong, but this was a great rbr. Well done man.

I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.

Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.

I don't even know who the hell you are. Probably another poster I emasculated with my intellect.

Tanzio wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

ValMar wrote:Guys, don't argue, look at Svetlana. She is "like thunder".........

You're right, nice milf

She'd tear your weeble clean off your wobble.

Did you see her fight? She's not tearing off anything. She moves more than she fights.

Mexi-Box wrote:

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote: I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.

Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.

I don't even know who the hell you are. Probably another poster I emasculated with my intellect.

You haven't said an intelligent thing the entire time you've been a member here. If you had, I would've given you credit for it.

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote:

Lackeos wrote: Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.

I don't even know who the hell you are. Probably another poster I emasculated with my intellect.

You haven't said an intelligent thing the entire time you've been a member here. If you had, I would've given you credit for it.

No, you wouldn't give me credit because everything I post here is intelligent. I haven't heard a peep from you thanking me for posting here, though.

Mexi-Box wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: You're right, nice milf

She'd tear your weeble clean off your wobble.

Did you see her fight? She's not tearing off anything. She moves more than she fights.

Movement is what tears weebles off, Mexi- box of rocks. Especially with a vise-grip.

Tanzio wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote:

Tanzio wrote: She'd tear your weeble clean off your wobble.

Did you see her fight? She's not tearing off anything. She moves more than she fights.

Movement is what tears weebles off, Mexi- box of rocks. Especially with a vise-grip.

What is wrong with you?

Mexi-Box wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote: Did you see her fight? She's not tearing off anything. She moves more than she fights.

Movement is what tears weebles off, Mexi- box of rocks. Especially with a vise-grip.

What is wrong with you?

You should know what the discussion is about prior to sticking your box of rocks in the middle of it.

Tanzio wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote:

Tanzio wrote: Movement is what tears weebles off, Mexi- box of rocks. Especially with a vise-grip.

What is wrong with you?

You should know what the discussion is about prior to sticking your box of rocks in the middle of it.

Do you know how much I hate you?

Mexi-Box wrote:

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote: I don't even know who the hell you are. Probably another poster I emasculated with my intellect.

You haven't said an intelligent thing the entire time you've been a member here. If you had, I would've given you credit for it.

No, you wouldn't give me credit because everything I post here is intelligent. I haven't heard a peep from you thanking me for posting here, though.

You should strive for actually deserving to be thanked for the quality of your posts, rather than delusively convincing yourself that you deserve to be thanked.

Try this: remove bias from the positions you take (you are extraordinarily biased towards eastern European fighters, if you haven't noticed), base your opinions on facts (you can often only back-up your grandiose evaluations of your favorite fighters with only your own eye test), you have a serious problem with narcissism that you need to address, stop being flat-out wrong about so many things, and attempt to discuss the topic of boxing more with fewer personal attacks.

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote:

Lackeos wrote: You haven't said an intelligent thing the entire time you've been a member here. If you had, I would've given you credit for it.

No, you wouldn't give me credit because everything I post here is intelligent. I haven't heard a peep from you thanking me for posting here, though.

You should strive for actually deserving to be thanked for the quality of your posts, rather than delusively convincing yourself that you deserve to be thanked.

Try this: remove bias from the positions you take (you are extraordinarily biased towards eastern European fighters, if you haven't noticed), base your opinions on facts (you can often only back-up your grandiose evaluations of your favorite fighters with only your own eye test), you have a serious problem with narcissism that you need to address, stop being flat-out wrong about so many things, and attempt to discuss the topic of boxing more with fewer personal attacks.

How about I try none of that and just keep posting my intelligent posts.

Mexi-Box wrote:

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote: No, you wouldn't give me credit because everything I post here is intelligent. I haven't heard a peep from you thanking me for posting here, though.

You should strive for actually deserving to be thanked for the quality of your posts, rather than delusively convincing yourself that you deserve to be thanked.

Try this: remove bias from the positions you take (you are extraordinarily biased towards eastern European fighters, if you haven't noticed), base your opinions on facts (you can often only back-up your grandiose evaluations of your favorite fighters with only your own eye test), you have a serious problem with narcissism that you need to address, stop being flat-out wrong about so many things, and attempt to discuss the topic of boxing more with fewer personal attacks.

How about I try none of that and just keep posting my intelligent posts.

So basically what you're saying is that, going forward, you will definitely continue to be biased, narcissistic, flat-out wrong, and fail to base your opinions on facts. I guess we agree on something.

Lackeos wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote:

Lackeos wrote: You should strive for actually deserving to be thanked for the quality of your posts, rather than delusively convincing yourself that you deserve to be thanked.

Try this: remove bias from the positions you take (you are extraordinarily biased towards eastern European fighters, if you haven't noticed), base your opinions on facts (you can often only back-up your grandiose evaluations of your favorite fighters with only your own eye test), you have a serious problem with narcissism that you need to address, stop being flat-out wrong about so many things, and attempt to discuss the topic of boxing more with fewer personal attacks.

How about I try none of that and just keep posting my intelligent posts.

So basically what you're saying is that, going forward, you will definitely continue to be biased, narcissistic, flat-out wrong, and fail to base your opinions on facts. I guess we agree on something.

No, I'm saying that your opinion is so blatantly wrong and misleading that I have to discount everything you said and just keep posting. I guess critical thinking isn't a strong point for you, though.

Mexi-Box wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote: What is wrong with you?

You should know what the discussion is about prior to sticking your box of rocks in the middle of it.

Do you know how much I hate you?

Wow, you are easily stirred to passion. Just in case, if you are actually a male, I am heterosexual. There will be no make-up sex in this relationship.

If you were to go back and actually bother to read what you so quickly agreed with I am confident that you would come to the understanding that you do not in fact agree with the words as structured, Mexi-box of rocks.

Tanzio wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote:

Tanzio wrote: You should know what the discussion is about prior to sticking your box of rocks in the middle of it.

Do you know how much I hate you?

Wow, you are easily stirred to passion. Just in case, if you are actually a male, I am heterosexual. There will be no make-up sex in this relationship.

If you were to go back and actually bother to read what you so quickly agreed with I am confident that you would come to the understanding that you do not in fact agree with the words as structured, Mexi-box of rocks.

It was tongue in cheek, though. No, I don't hate you, and I was laughing to myself when I wrote it.

Mexi-Box wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

Mexi-Box wrote: Do you know how much I hate you?

Wow, you are easily stirred to passion. Just in case, if you are actually a male, I am heterosexual. There will be no make-up sex in this relationship.

If you were to go back and actually bother to read what you so quickly agreed with I am confident that you would come to the understanding that you do not in fact agree with the words as structured, Mexi-box of rocks.

It was tongue in cheek, though. No, I don't hate you, and I was laughing to myself when I wrote it.

touché

Russia has the cutest ring girls!