BoxRec

asdfjkl wrote:I have no idea what you're talking about @bad guy

@Lackeos I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

@taansend, Yes I have, in fact I never lost, but that was in highschool against other 17 year olds with 0 experience. I have a very short reach somehow, so I would never make it to the top. I am quite strong btw, especially at the time. It destroyed me somehow, I was completely out of breath within a minit.

asdfjkl wrote:@Lackeos I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

Lackeos wrote:IMO, Mansour's callouts are too ambitious for where he sits in the actual, non-ABC rankings. You beat Travis Kauffman, that's nice (I'm being a little bit sarcastic and patronizing). Beating Kauffman doesn't earn you a shot at champions. He simply doesn't have the right to bemoan the types of fighters who are rejecting him. If someone in the top 15 rejects Mansour, it's because Mansour is a gnat who hasn't earned the right to be in the ring with fighters like that. If he really wants to complain about rejections of legitimate offers, he should be making offers to Helenius, Teper, Kownacki, Jarrell Miller, Ustinov, Wawrzyk, Dimitrenko, maybe even Chisora and Takam. That's the level of opponent you've earned after you beat Kauffman, and it's a list of fighters who can't simply say "I've got bigger fish to fry," because they don't.

I know that Mansour is getting old and doesn't have a lot of time left to get paid, but he just hasn't earned it. He needs to focus on securing the best opponent that he can actually get, instead of wasting all of his focus chasing down opponents he can't get.

Lackeos wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:@Lackeos I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

That's not honest. If you said YOU were a coward and Whyte wasn't a coward, you would be 200% honest. Right now, you're completely the opposite. Whyte fought Anthony Joshua. In absolute terms, Anthony Joshua is the most formidable boxer in the entire world.

asdfjkl wrote:I have no idea what you're talking about @bad guy

@Lackeos I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

@taansend, Yes I have, in fact I never lost, but that was in highschool against other 17 year olds with 0 experience. I have a very short reach somehow, so I would never make it to the top. I am quite strong btw, especially at the time. It destroyed me somehow, I was completely out of breath within a minit.

Taansend wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:I have no idea what you're talking about @bad guy

@Lackeos I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

@taansend, Yes I have, in fact I never lost, but that was in highschool against other 17 year olds with 0 experience. I have a very short reach somehow, so I would never make it to the top. I am quite strong btw, especially at the time. It destroyed me somehow, I was completely out of breath within a minit.

So you claim be boxer who thinks other boxers are COWARDS?

asdfjkl wrote:

Lackeos wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:@Lackeos I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

That's not honest. If you said YOU were a coward and Whyte wasn't a coward, you would be 200% honest. Right now, you're completely the opposite. Whyte fought Anthony Joshua. In absolute terms, Anthony Joshua is the most formidable boxer in the entire world.

If Whyte offers me 4,5 mil I'll gladly accept it. If Mansour offers me 450k I'll gladly accept it. If anyone who obviously has 0 chance in beating me, or even injure me, offers me over 10k I'll accept it. If you hear me claiming I'm better, while I don't box that boxer, then you can consider it as a duck, especially if I have nothing better to do.

@Tiny, please join PTBF so you can show your knowledge, because at this moment you're pretty much exactly my definition of a coward, you got big talks, but you show absolutely nothing.

asdfjkl wrote:

Taansend wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:I have no idea what you're talking about @bad guy

@Lackeos I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

@taansend, Yes I have, in fact I never lost, but that was in highschool against other 17 year olds with 0 experience. I have a very short reach somehow, so I would never make it to the top. I am quite strong btw, especially at the time. It destroyed me somehow, I was completely out of breath within a minit.

So you claim be boxer who thinks other boxers are COWARDS?

I'm not a boxer lol, I'm not a footballer or a basketballer, or anything like that, you asked me if I ever boxer a minit in my life, yes I did, that's all.
And yes, ofcourse there are cowards, you make yourself look like a guy who admires Charlie Zelenoff or something. I look at the boxer and watch his skills, I don't listen to a boxer and believe him automatically. A boxer may have talks, but if he can't back it up, then he just shouldn't have spread his lies.

Taansend wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Taansend wrote:
So you claim be boxer who thinks other boxers are COWARDS?

I'm not a boxer lol, I'm not a footballer or a basketballer, or anything like that, you asked me if I ever boxer a minit in my life, yes I did, that's all.
And yes, ofcourse there are cowards, you make yourself look like a guy who admires Charlie Zelenoff or something. I look at the boxer and watch his skills, I don't listen to a boxer and believe him automatically. A boxer may have talks, but if he can't back it up, then he just shouldn't have spread his lies.

I've never heard of Charlie Zelanov.

So you are saying Whyte is a coward based on something Mansour said even though you don't automatically believe what Mansour said.

asdfjkl wrote:

Taansend wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: I'm not a boxer lol, I'm not a footballer or a basketballer, or anything like that, you asked me if I ever boxer a minit in my life, yes I did, that's all.
And yes, ofcourse there are cowards, you make yourself look like a guy who admires Charlie Zelenoff or something. I look at the boxer and watch his skills, I don't listen to a boxer and believe him automatically. A boxer may have talks, but if he can't back it up, then he just shouldn't have spread his lies.

I've never heard of Charlie Zelanov.

So you are saying Whyte is a coward based on something Mansour said even though you don't automatically believe what Mansour said.

If you actually follow the sport you start learning the people involved better, you know their reactions, you realise who's a lier and who isn't, things like that. You'll recognice behaviour and you know automatically which things most likely did happen and what things are most likely a lie.

It's not that surprising that Povetkin turned out to be innocent, twice and it's not that surprising that Wilder and the WBC act like he is, it's all very predictable actually, once you start watching and following boxing.
Within the heavyweigth league I'm usually right, sometimes it just takes a while before the evidence is there and yes that's sometimes very annoying, especially if there are retards that only follow the mainstream media who spread bullshit, usually it's like, the more evidence, the more easy I can show I'm right, somehow the evidence is not always there straight away.

Taansend wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Taansend wrote:
I've never heard of Charlie Zelanov.

So you are saying Whyte is a coward based on something Mansour said even though you don't automatically believe what Mansour said.

If you actually follow the sport you start learning the people involved better, you know their reactions, you realise who's a lier and who isn't, things like that. You'll recognice behaviour and you know automatically which things most likely did happen and what things are most likely a lie.

It's not that surprising that Povetkin turned out to be innocent, twice and it's not that surprising that Wilder and the WBC act like he is, it's all very predictable actually, once you start watching and following boxing.
Within the heavyweigth league I'm usually right, sometimes it just takes a while before the evidence is there and yes that's sometimes very annoying, especially if there are retards that only follow the mainstream media who spread bullshit, usually it's like, the more evidence, the more easy I can show I'm right, somehow the evidence is not always there straight away.

I know English isn't your first language, so I'll try again.

I'm asking you why you think it's ok to call Dillian Whyte a COWARD and you're talking about someone named Charlie Zelanov and then talking about Povetkin. Neither of which is relevant to you calling Whyte a coward.

So again, why are you calling Dillian Whyte a Coward?

asdfjkl wrote:

Taansend wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: If you actually follow the sport you start learning the people involved better, you know their reactions, you realise who's a lier and who isn't, things like that. You'll recognice behaviour and you know automatically which things most likely did happen and what things are most likely a lie.

It's not that surprising that Povetkin turned out to be innocent, twice and it's not that surprising that Wilder and the WBC act like he is, it's all very predictable actually, once you start watching and following boxing.
Within the heavyweigth league I'm usually right, sometimes it just takes a while before the evidence is there and yes that's sometimes very annoying, especially if there are retards that only follow the mainstream media who spread bullshit, usually it's like, the more evidence, the more easy I can show I'm right, somehow the evidence is not always there straight away.

I know English isn't your first language, so I'll try again.

I'm asking you why you think it's ok to call Dillian Whyte a COWARD and you're talking about someone named Charlie Zelanov and then talking about Povetkin. Neither of which is relevant to you calling Whyte a coward.

So again, why are you calling Dillian Whyte a Coward?

Because he ducked Mansour... You really didn't read the article did you? Also, please read my actual post about it, because you're putting words in my mouth, which is a kind of sad.

Enlightened-One wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Taansend wrote:
I know English isn't your first language, so I'll try again.

I'm asking you why you think it's ok to call Dillian Whyte a COWARD and you're talking about someone named Charlie Zelanov and then talking about Povetkin. Neither of which is relevant to you calling Whyte a coward.

So again, why are you calling Dillian Whyte a Coward?

Because he ducked Mansour... You really didn't read the article did you? Also, please read my actual post about it, because you're putting words in my mouth, which is a kind of sad.

Whyte didn't duck Mansour.

asdfjkl wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Because he ducked Mansour... You really didn't read the article did you? Also, please read my actual post about it, because you're putting words in my mouth, which is a kind of sad.

Whyte didn't duck Mansour.

So you call Mansour a lier?

tiny_acres wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Whyte didn't duck Mansour.

So you call Mansour a lier?

So Povetkin ducked Mansour by your reasoning.

tiny_acres wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Whyte didn't duck Mansour.

So you call Mansour a lier?

So Povetkin ducked Mansour by your reasoning.

asdfjkl wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Because he ducked Mansour... You really didn't read the article did you? Also, please read my actual post about it, because you're putting words in my mouth, which is a kind of sad.

Whyte didn't duck Mansour.

So you call Mansour a lier?

marvelous marv wrote:I love how you are conveniently ignoring the fact that Mansour says Povetkin is ducking him, he is willing to travel to fight in Russia.

Blodhemn wrote:Expected a shitty thread and wasn't disappointed. Thank you RKO for providing yet another venue of quality discussion.

Ruthless-RKO wrote:

Blodhemn wrote:Expected a shitty thread and wasn't disappointed. Thank you RKO for providing yet another venue of quality discussion.

I hardly post or get in to discussions in my OWN threads. Certain individuals don't know when a debate is over.

You're welcome btw