Oohhh....u in a good mood today . u sound less arrogant than usualy. But. Dont be a smartarse. Always pointing out every minor wrong thing somebody wrote. Smartarseism makes headaches. Save yourself from headaches. Be cool atleast try. Today is a beautiful day son is shining perfect day to be coolSaadOffTheDeck wrote:God no, you're constantly wrong. You just cited Brooks reach as a reason he'll beat Crawford when Terrence has longer arms. Whitaker was better than Roy. And the Davies thing, I've never been that wrong. You have nice enthusiasm for the sport and a rare positive attitude, you just struggle to understand what you're watching.Jip wrote:Hehe.....that is all you got. One bad example from me that you will repeat 1000 times because aside from that you dont have nothing on me?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Anytime you disagree with me, I know I'm right. All the live fights and modern film lead you to the conclusion that Davies was better than Crawford.
Roy Jones Jr. winning a HW title.
Re: Roy Jones Jr. winning a HW title.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Roy Jones Jr. winning a HW title.
I don't get headaches, you're wrong again.Jip wrote:Oohhh....u in a good mood today . u sound less arrogant than usualy. But. Dont be a smartarse. Always pointing out every minor wrong thing somebody wrote. Smartarseism makes headaches. Save yourself from headaches. Be cool atleast try. Today is a beautiful day son is shining perfect day to be coolSaadOffTheDeck wrote:God no, you're constantly wrong. You just cited Brooks reach as a reason he'll beat Crawford when Terrence has longer arms. Whitaker was better than Roy. And the Davies thing, I've never been that wrong. You have nice enthusiasm for the sport and a rare positive attitude, you just struggle to understand what you're watching.Jip wrote:
Hehe.....that is all you got. One bad example from me that you will repeat 1000 times because aside from that you dont have nothing on me?
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Roy Jones Jr. winning a HW title.
Ballooning up ruined him. Look at his results after
-
Boxing Writer
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45
Re: Roy Jones Jr. winning a HW title.
Yes, because Tyson and Holyfield were both shot to sh1t in 2003. Against prime versions of them Roy's chances would be very slim at best.Jip wrote:As boring ruiz was. He was a good hw who beat holyfield. It is not that beat ruiz, it is the way he did it wininning 12 out of 12 rds. Tyson & holyfield would had mayor problems with jones. Rjj should fought both of them. I dont care who wouldve win or lost, just good match ups. Roy wouldve have had a good chance defeating both.VG_Addict wrote:How much credit should Roy get for winning a HW title? Yes, he was the first fighter in a century to win titles from MW to HW, but he won a trinket belt by beating a slow, light-punching, undersized HW in Ruiz.
Re: Roy Jones Jr. winning a HW title.
We saw how well Spinx, a light heavy arguably better than Jones did against a prime Tyson. He lasted about 90 seconds.
Re: Roy Jones Jr. winning a HW title.
I was at Jones v Ruiz, what a great night for Roy I'll never forget it.