Page 2 of 7
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 05 Aug 2017, 23:09
by Kalan
Tanzio wrote:Kalan wrote:Arsenal49 wrote:
How am I an idiot with 30 years boxing experience I could probably knock out loma myself
You're out there with BuzzBox in Zu Zu Land -- traipsing through moonbeams and kissing fireflies.
Lomassiah is a great boxer. Kalan is one of BoxBuzz's alter egos.
Now I get it... Tanzio is BuzzBox.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 05 Aug 2017, 23:35
by Tanzio
Kalan wrote:Tanzio wrote:Kalan wrote:
You're out there with BuzzBox in Zu Zu Land -- traipsing through moonbeams and kissing fireflies.
Lomassiah is a great boxer. Kalan is one of BoxBuzz's alter egos.
Now I get it... Tanzio is BuzzBox.
Classic counter BB.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 05 Aug 2017, 23:39
by Tanzio
Beltran looking good for a sparring partner for fighting Zlaticanin.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 05 Aug 2017, 23:48
by Tanzio
Beltran is definitely getting a lot of mileage on his career.
Maybe Beltran and Salido should fight a dual retirement match.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 05 Aug 2017, 23:57
by diddy
Beltran almost got robbed blind. And nobody would've blinked.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 05 Aug 2017, 23:59
by Tanzio
Lomassiah yawning before the fight.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:08
by diddy
Tanzio wrote:Lomassiah yawning before the fight.
He's a -10,000 favorite so no surprise there.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:09
by gilgamesh
diddy wrote:Beltran almost got robbed blind. And nobody would've blinked.
Yeah those cards were ridiculous. I had it 99-91 for Beltran.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:10
by squiggy
Atlas can't say enough about this Loman Chinko fella.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:11
by Grant
Everything is so Wonderful when the Judges agree with the Teddy Atlas.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:17
by diddy
Beltran won that fight clearly but Vazquez gave the illusion of being busy which meant the cards would be tight. Judges are retarded. They have no idea what they're watching.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:23
by diddy
Vasyl is a ridiculously beautiful fighter. Really the perfect fighter. Skill level is just off the charts.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:24
by Tanzio
Lomassiah looks considerably bigger than Marriaga.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:27
by diddy
Just walking him down like he's fighting a 5 year old.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:36
by Tanzio
Marriaga fighting well. This should end by seven though.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:39
by Tanzio
Lomassiah needs to stay away from Mikey.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:45
by Ricky_
What a sh!t card.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:48
by Tanzio
They call it between 7 and 8.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:49
by crusader
Tanzio wrote:Lomassiah needs to stay away from Mikey.
Why? I think it would be a great pairing..
Easy work for Loma tonight. Hopefully a good opponent next.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:51
by Tanzio
Not overly impressed by Lomassiah (relatively) in this fight.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:52
by crusader
Hard for me to take much from it. Loma was playing with a negative, overmatched opponent and it was hardly a contest..
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:53
by gilgamesh
Amazingly talented fighter. Hope he's not paired up with such an overmatched opponent again. This is just a waste of his time. He's too good for guys like this.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:54
by Tanzio
crusader wrote:Tanzio wrote:Lomassiah needs to stay away from Mikey.
Why? I think it would be a great pairing..
Easy work for Loma tonight. Hopefully a good opponent next.
It was not that easy. He took too much punishment and he wasted way too much energy missing shots. I just think that Lomassiah should fight Berchelt, GTank, LSC, etc., rather than moving up.
Mikey will tear him up at 135 right now, imo.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:56
by crusader
He was toying with him and didnt lose 15 seconds of that fight. Punishment? He got hit with pretty much nothing meaningful. Hes just one of those guys who marks up.
Re: Lomachenko
Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 00:57
by gilgamesh
crusader wrote:He was toying with him and didnt lose 15 seconds of that fight. Punishment? He got hit with pretty much nothing meaningful. Hes just one of those guys who marks up.
Yeah the only damage to his face came from headbutts from what I could tell. I didn't see him get hit with meaningful punches at any point.