BoxRec

Badhusker wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:

NateJR wrote:
Not a excuse, Rigo is too small. History proves this as well. Rigo has as good of a chance as Marquez had against Floyd, Brook had against GGG, Khan had against Alvarez. Going into those fights it was the same story, the smaller guy was biting off more than he could chew and this fight will be no different. Not sure how a forgone conclusion is labeled as a excuse.

You people obviously don't know know what a excuse is.

Your last sentence is pure ironic gold, especially given the preceding paragraph.

I'm just curious....who do you pick to win, and why?

Lomachenko; he's better in every department in my opinion, and he's bigger.

My problem isn't with the suggestion that Loma is too big, my problem is that NateJR is a hypocrite.

This is the ONLY possible way that i could be a Rigndeaux fan for a night. I happen to despise both fighters and their entitled view of themselves prior to boxing one professional round. I think it's the first fight between 2 boxers that both received world title shots before their 8th pro fight. Joke. Aside from the possible Rocky 2 ending but with both guys staying down... I think Loma's the one i want to see lose most because of the way his fans disregard his loss as never happening and somehow saying he's the best in the world P4P. How can you be if you can't even beat everyone in his weight class?

Go Rigo! I'm not saying that there won't be a lot of skill displayed in this one. It should be an excellent fight but I just dislike both guys.

Went a bit quiet on the fight, maybe to wait until the circus had left town, but Arum said this yesterday:

https://www.badlefthook.com/2017/8/29/1 ... cember-9th

On if Lomachenko-Rigondeaux is 100% a done deal:

“Nothing is 100% done until it happens. But it’s gonna happen [on] December 9th.”

May the best man win.