BoxRec

gilgamesh wrote:I haven't heard an unkind word said about Jacobs on the forums. I didn't think he beat GGG, but he certainly gave GGG his hardest fight to date, and I want to see more of him.

If he don't fight it's because he ain't fighting, not because people don't wanna see him. Lots of Boxing fans want to see Danny Jacobs fight again.

You don't get it. It's the push from the fans.

And before the cancer thing, Jacobs used to get shit on here.
He was a complete afterthought, even after he beat Quillin.

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:

SFW wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:
I had Maidana beating Floyd close. I had GGG beating Jacobs. So, I disagree.

I wouldn't mind seeing a GGG/Jacobs rematch at all.

I believe a lot of the work Maidana did illegally in that fight benefited the smaller amount of good work he did, his jab was good but he really took about 5 rounds max. I thought 115-112 GGG was the right score against DJ, the bombs Gennady walked through was impressive. DJ can crack.

So you should understand what I'm saying. If GGG was always losing 5 rounds, I'd be like whatever.
But GGG has been dominating everyone in a way you don't normally see. It's special.
How could you not want to see him challenged? If you want Canelo, fine. People are stupid for celebrity.

But when "real" fans are clamoring for BJS over Jacobs, it's stupid. Imo

What's stupid about it? Jacobs' Middleweight resume is pretty thin. He has TWO names on his resume. GGG and Peter Quillin. He's 1-1 against them. Is it unreasonable to want to see him get a winning record against name fighters?

Lemieux, Saunders, Charlo, GGG again, Canelo, Derevyanchenko...any of those guys would be good opponents for Jacobs. Instead he's probably gonna sit around on the shelf fighting his own inactivity. It's the PBC way.

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:I haven't heard an unkind word said about Jacobs on the forums. I didn't think he beat GGG, but he certainly gave GGG his hardest fight to date, and I want to see more of him.

If he don't fight it's because he ain't fighting, not because people don't wanna see him. Lots of Boxing fans want to see Danny Jacobs fight again.

You don't get it. It's the push from the fans.

And before the cancer thing, Jacobs used to get poo on here.
He was a complete afterthought, even after he beat Quillin.

What's there to get? People want to see him fight. If he doesn't fight how's that their fault?

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:He's a PBC fighter. they're all inactive. All they have is the cheap Fox cards and a few on Bounce. Past that they need Showtime money to fight.

Inactivity can hurt as hell.

It sucks, not quite as much as your post but it sucks all the same.

Enlightened-One wrote:

apollo creed wrote:Man, this dude is thinking that he's already an ATG fighter just because he went 12 rds with GGG and he didn't get knocked out! I didn't hear nothing about his next opponent and I truly want to see him against someone notable. or that GGG fight took a lot from him ??

Isn't Danny Jacobs scheduled to headline a PBC fight card against an unspecified opponent on the 14th October?

Why didn't you bother to check this prior to creating this thread?

No, he is not.

Enlightened-One wrote:Isn't Danny Jacobs scheduled to headline a PBC fight card against an unspecified opponent on the 14th October?

Why do people bother to speculate when it's far quicker to check Danny's fight schedule than to create a hate-filled derogatory thread based on lazy ignorance?

No, he is not. You should probably look things up properly before displaying your ignorance and insulting someone else. Stupid thread, but not quite as stupid as repeating your incorrect self. Now do you want to apologize to everyone in the thread for your dishonesty? Charlo/Hurd is the target for oct 14tth, with your beloved PBC, there might not be any card. Why did you stop trolling your fellatio of the PBC thread?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:He's a PBC fighter. they're all inactive. All they have is the cheap Fox cards and a few on Bounce. Past that they need Showtime money to fight.

Inactivity can hurt as hell.

It sucks, not quite as much as your post but it sucks all the same.

gilgamesh wrote:

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:

SFW wrote:
I believe a lot of the work Maidana did illegally in that fight benefited the smaller amount of good work he did, his jab was good but he really took about 5 rounds max. I thought 115-112 GGG was the right score against DJ, the bombs Gennady walked through was impressive. DJ can crack.

So you should understand what I'm saying. If GGG was always losing 5 rounds, I'd be like whatever.
But GGG has been dominating everyone in a way you don't normally see. It's special.
How could you not want to see him challenged? If you want Canelo, fine. People are stupid for celebrity.

But when "real" fans are clamoring for BJS over Jacobs, it's stupid. Imo

What's stupid about it? Jacobs' Middleweight resume is pretty thin. He has TWO names on his resume. GGG and Peter Quillin. He's 1-1 against them. Is it unreasonable to want to see him get a winning record against name fighters?

Lemieux, Saunders, Charlo, GGG again, Canelo, Derevyanchenko...any of those guys would be good opponents for Jacobs. Instead he's probably gonna sit around on the shelf fighting his own inactivity. It's the PBC way.

Yup, Instead of fighting each other to build up their names , these guys are hoping they would hit the lottery by fighting GGG/Canelo winner. They should know that GGG-Canelo winner will call the shots with or without the titles on the line.

apollo creed wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:

BAD INTENTIONS wrote: So you should understand what I'm saying. If GGG was always losing 5 rounds, I'd be like whatever.
But GGG has been dominating everyone in a way you don't normally see. It's special.
How could you not want to see him challenged? If you want Canelo, fine. People are stupid for celebrity.

But when "real" fans are clamoring for BJS over Jacobs, it's stupid. Imo

What's stupid about it? Jacobs' Middleweight resume is pretty thin. He has TWO names on his resume. GGG and Peter Quillin. He's 1-1 against them. Is it unreasonable to want to see him get a winning record against name fighters?

Lemieux, Saunders, Charlo, GGG again, Canelo, Derevyanchenko...any of those guys would be good opponents for Jacobs. Instead he's probably gonna sit around on the shelf fighting his own inactivity. It's the PBC way.

Yup, Instead of fighting each other to build up their name , these guys are hoping they would hit the lottery by fighting GGG/Canelo winner. They don't know that GGG-Canelo winner will call the shots with or without the titles on the line.

Well, if they don't get their shot at the winner they will get a shot at a vacated belt.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:
What's stupid about it? Jacobs' Middleweight resume is pretty thin. He has TWO names on his resume. GGG and Peter Quillin. He's 1-1 against them. Is it unreasonable to want to see him get a winning record against name fighters?

Lemieux, Saunders, Charlo, GGG again, Canelo, Derevyanchenko...any of those guys would be good opponents for Jacobs. Instead he's probably gonna sit around on the shelf fighting his own inactivity. It's the PBC way.

Yup, Instead of fighting each other to build up their name , these guys are hoping they would hit the lottery by fighting GGG/Canelo winner. They don't know that GGG-Canelo winner will call the shots with or without the titles on the line.

Well, if they don't get their shot at the winner they will get a shot at a vacated belt.

which is just a trinket nowadays.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:Isn't Danny Jacobs scheduled to headline a PBC fight card against an unspecified opponent on the 14th October?

Why do people bother to speculate when it's far quicker to check Danny's fight schedule than to create a hate-filled derogatory thread based on lazy ignorance?

No, he is not. You should probably look things up properly before displaying your ignorance and insulting someone else. Stupid thread, but not quite as stupid as repeating your incorrect self. Now do you want to apologize to everyone in the thread for your dishonesty? Charlo/Hurd is the target for oct 14tth, with your beloved PBC, there might not be any card. Why did you stop trolling your fellatio of the PBC thread?

I quoted an article published on the 1st August that quoted Danny Jacobs' very own words.

If he doesn't fight on that exact date, his proposed bout will be staged shortly afterwards.

Do you need evidence of this? Google it and you'll surely appreciate the justification for my claim.

Please please please try to challenge me on this.

apollo creed wrote: which is just a trinket nowadays.

That goes for pretty much all the title belts.

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:
Yup, Instead of fighting each other to build up their name , these guys are hoping they would hit the lottery by fighting GGG/Canelo winner. They don't know that GGG-Canelo winner will call the shots with or without the titles on the line.

Well, if they don't get their shot at the winner they will get a shot at a vacated belt.

which is just a trinket nowadays.

Absolutely, a trinket they all crave as much as GGG did.

gilgamesh wrote:

apollo creed wrote: which is just a trinket nowadays.

That goes for pretty much all the title belts.

agree!

Enlightened-One wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:Isn't Danny Jacobs scheduled to headline a PBC fight card against an unspecified opponent on the 14th October?

Why do people bother to speculate when it's far quicker to check Danny's fight schedule than to create a hate-filled derogatory thread based on lazy ignorance?

No, he is not. You should probably look things up properly before displaying your ignorance and insulting someone else. Stupid thread, but not quite as stupid as repeating your incorrect self. Now do you want to apologize to everyone in the thread for your dishonesty? Charlo/Hurd is the target for oct 14tth, with your beloved PBC, there might not be any card. Why did you stop trolling your fellatio of the PBC thread?

I quoted an article published on the 1st August that quoted Danny Jacobs' very own words.

If he doesn't fight on that exact date, his proposed bout will be staged shortly afterwards.

Do you need evidence of this? Google it and you'll surely appreciate the justification for my claim.

You asked if he was headlining a card on Oct 14th, he is not. Vintage you, wrong as always.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Well, if they don't get their shot at the winner they will get a shot at a vacated belt.

which is just a trinket nowadays.

Absolutely, a trinket they all crave as much as GGG did.

Yes but GGG has almost all of them.

These trinkets means nothing unless you have all of them.

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:
which is just a trinket nowadays.

Absolutely, a trinket they all crave as much as GGG did.

Yes but GGG has almost all of them.

These trinkets means nothing unless you have all of them.

They still don't mean much because one of the title orgs always inevitably finds some reason or another to "strip" you of your title. Undisputed Champions don't last in this sport. They can't. It's not even possible.

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:
which is just a trinket nowadays.

Absolutely, a trinket they all crave as much as GGG did.

Yes but GGG has almost all of them.

These trinkets means nothing unless you have all of them.

Yes, but GGG started with one and had accomplished nothing when he got it. Doesn't being a hypocrite bother you?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
No, he is not. You should probably look things up properly before displaying your ignorance and insulting someone else. Stupid thread, but not quite as stupid as repeating your incorrect self. Now do you want to apologize to everyone in the thread for your dishonesty? Charlo/Hurd is the target for oct 14tth, with your beloved PBC, there might not be any card. Why did you stop trolling your fellatio of the PBC thread?

I quoted an article published on the 1st August that quoted Danny Jacobs' very own words.

If he doesn't fight on that exact date, his proposed bout will be staged shortly afterwards.

Do you need evidence of this? Google it and you'll surely appreciate the justification for my claim.

You asked if he was headlining a card on Oct 14th, he is not. Vintage you, wrong as always.

EO remembered to type some great facts from his abysmal wisdom.

gilgamesh wrote:

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:

SFW wrote:
I believe a lot of the work Maidana did illegally in that fight benefited the smaller amount of good work he did, his jab was good but he really took about 5 rounds max. I thought 115-112 GGG was the right score against DJ, the bombs Gennady walked through was impressive. DJ can crack.

So you should understand what I'm saying. If GGG was always losing 5 rounds, I'd be like whatever.
But GGG has been dominating everyone in a way you don't normally see. It's special.
How could you not want to see him challenged? If you want Canelo, fine. People are stupid for celebrity.

But when "real" fans are clamoring for BJS over Jacobs, it's stupid. Imo

What's stupid about it? Jacobs' Middleweight resume is pretty thin. He has TWO names on his resume. GGG and Peter Quillin. He's 1-1 against them. Is it unreasonable to want to see him get a winning record against name fighters?

Lemieux, Saunders, Charlo, GGG again, Canelo, Derevyanchenko...any of those guys would be good opponents for Jacobs. Instead he's probably gonna sit around on the shelf fighting his own inactivity. It's the PBC way.

He has THREE names on his resume: Pirog, Quillin and GGG, and he is 1-2 against them.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Absolutely, a trinket they all crave as much as GGG did.

Yes but GGG has almost all of them.

These trinkets means nothing unless you have all of them.

Yes, but GGG started with one and had accomplished nothing when he got it. Doesn't being a hypocrite bother you?

Because he was avoided like plague by Sturm, Martinez and Quillin at that time but he took the hard way, beat Proksa, Macklin, Rubio, Geale, Stevens , Murray and Monroe Jr to get Lemieux, Jacobs and now Canelo.

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:
Yes but GGG has almost all of them.

These trinkets means nothing unless you have all of them.

Yes, but GGG started with one and had accomplished nothing when he got it. Doesn't being a hypocrite bother you?

Because he was avoided like plague by Sturm, Martinez and Quillin at that time but he took the hard way, beat Proksa, Macklin,Rubio Geale, Stevens , Murray and Monroe Jr to get Lemieux, Jacobs and now Canelo.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

apollo creed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Yes, but GGG started with one and had accomplished nothing when he got it. Doesn't being a hypocrite bother you?

Because he was avoided like plague by Sturm, Martinez and Quillin at that time but he took the hard way, beat Proksa, Macklin,Rubio Geale, Stevens , Murray and Monroe Jr to get Lemieux, Jacobs and now Canelo.

GGG pretty much cleaned out the mw division at that time to fight Canelo.