BoxRec

Ossyrules wrote:

Badhusker wrote:Wilder's first choice for his next fight is Joshua or Ortiz. If either of those don't happen next, blame one of those guys, because the ball in their court.
Joshua has no more legal obligation to fight Pulev than he does Ortiz. One or the other may strip him, but doubt both do if he chooses to fight Wilder for unification. Wilder is wiling to step up. Lets see if Ortiz or Joshua is. Rest assured though if either doesn't happen, idiots will blame Wilder. EO had a good point about using facts to support your argument.

As far as the winner of Parker vs Fury, I hope it is Parker, because Fury already ducked a chance to fight Wilder. He wanted 8 full weeks to train instead of seven weeks he would have had.

Eddie Hearn has said that if it wasn't the Wlad rematch, the ibf have mandated Joshua to fight pulev

Keep pitching up your wilder bias vs Joshua anti and I'll keep hitting them out

Or maybe give it a rest and get out of Wilders arse. "Wilders willing to step up..." is hilirious considering career so far

Like I said, and apparently you don't understand....is that Joshua has BOTH been threatened by the IBF and WBA to be stripped. Joshua has TWO mandatories, but they are only considering the IBF. IBF's belt does not trump any other belt. It comes down to who he choses to fight. WBA has also mandated that Joshua fight Ortiz next, which is holding up Ortiz signing to fight Wilder.

You are such a fornicating blind idiot when it comes to Wilder. You keep trying at "hitting them out" as I pitch what you say is Wilder bias. When you come up with something logical, I will acknowledge it. It isn't a joke that Wilder wants to fight Joshua or Ortiz, but to guys that hate Wilder like yourself, it is. People like you do not want Wilder to get a chance against Joshua or Ortiz, or you will have to backtrack and say you are wrong.

Take a step back and look at things from a neutral standpoint, and forget the hate. Come back with a logical argument, or do not respond. I'm tired of your stupid fornicating bs, that is based on nothing other than Wilder hate. Ortiz and Joshua may KO Wilder. I just want to see it. You do not.

apollo creed wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

apollo creed wrote:WOW! EO almost having a breakdown due to some regular people who express their opinions on a public forum.

Personal opinions that differ from mine in relation to a fact or a real-world event that both parties concede happened, is perfectly fine by me.

A personal opinion that is not only highly derogatory in nature, but is also borne from nothing but pure ignorance, well... that's just unacceptable.

Please !

So in other words, you admit to talking pure utter bôllôcks and you also concede to being embarrassed about your lack of knowledge of the sport of boxing being exposed with so little effort?

I heard the guy from McDonalds around the corner got a good offer.

Still, Breazeale is loads faster, stronger, bigger and similar skilled compared to Stiverne, he can't possibly lose that fight against Stiverne :s?

Badhusker wrote:

Ossyrules wrote:

Badhusker wrote:Wilder's first choice for his next fight is Joshua or Ortiz. If either of those don't happen next, blame one of those guys, because the ball in their court.
Joshua has no more legal obligation to fight Pulev than he does Ortiz. One or the other may strip him, but doubt both do if he chooses to fight Wilder for unification. Wilder is wiling to step up. Lets see if Ortiz or Joshua is. Rest assured though if either doesn't happen, idiots will blame Wilder. EO had a good point about using facts to support your argument.

As far as the winner of Parker vs Fury, I hope it is Parker, because Fury already ducked a chance to fight Wilder. He wanted 8 full weeks to train instead of seven weeks he would have had.

Eddie Hearn has said that if it wasn't the Wlad rematch, the ibf have mandated Joshua to fight pulev

Keep pitching up your wilder bias vs Joshua anti and I'll keep hitting them out

Or maybe give it a rest and get out of Wilders arse. "Wilders willing to step up..." is hilirious considering career so far

Like I said, and apparently you don't understand....is that Joshua has BOTH been threatened by the IBF and WBA to be stripped. Joshua has TWO mandatories, but they are only considering the IBF. IBF's belt does not trump any other belt. It comes down to who he choses to fight. WBA has also mandated that Joshua fight Ortiz next, which is holding up Ortiz signing to fight Wilder.

You are such a effing blind idiot when it comes to Wilder. You keep trying at "hitting them out" as I pitch what you say is Wilder bias. When you come up with something logical, I will acknowledge it. It isn't a joke that Wilder wants to fight Joshua or Ortiz, but to guys that hate Wilder like yourself, it is. People like you do not want Wilder to get a chance against Joshua or Ortiz, or you will have to backtrack and say you are wrong.

Take a step back and look at things from a neutral standpoint, and forget the hate. Come back with a logical argument, or do not respond. I'm tired of your stupid effing bs, that is based on nothing other than Wilder hate. Ortiz and Joshua may KO Wilder. I just want to see it. You do not.

You're hilarious mate with that last post

Hearn has that it was always the IBF mandatory if not the Wlad fight

I can't wait for wilder or Ortiz to fight Joshua. In the mean time Joshua is fighting one of the other better heavyweight contenders

You quoting being neutral is amazing. Take your own advice. Every post you make has a positive wilder spin and a slant against Joshua.

Understand the themes of their careers so far and you'll get a picture for each of they ambitions. Until then keep crawling up Wilders arse.

Enlightened-One wrote:

apollo creed wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Personal opinions that differ from mine in relation to a fact or a real-world event that both parties concede happened, is perfectly fine by me.

A personal opinion that is not only highly derogatory in nature, but is also borne from nothing but pure ignorance, well... that's just unacceptable.

Please !

So in other words, you admit to talking pure utter bôllôcks and you also concede to being embarrassed about your lack of knowledge of the sport of boxing being exposed with so little effort?

You'r so funny ! You amuse me!

Stiverne
Miller
Breazeale
C. Martin

..tough, tough challenges for Wilder.

I'd like to share a quote from Deontay Wilder, posted to his facebook account.

Date 22.01.2016 or for you Americans 01.22.16

"I don't play boxing. I take this sport seriously. Last year I became A champion, this year I will become THE champion.....
-Deontay Wilder

lazboy wrote:I'd like to share a quote from Deontay Wilder, posted to his facebook account.

Date 22.01.2016 or for you Americans 01.22.16

"I don't play boxing. I take this sport seriously. Last year I became A champion, this year I will become THE champion.....
-Deontay Wilder

then ... Gerald Washington, Chris Arreola, Artur Szpilka, Johann Duhaupas, Eric Molina.

Any news wilder vs ortiz??4.11? Already only two months

stellar wrote:Any news wilder vs ortiz??4.11? Already only two months

It won't happen. Wilder is just patiently waiting for Joshua to cash out. Meanwhile he may stay busy against Stiverne.

I dont think sou that Wilder wonts really fight with Joshua

apollo creed wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

apollo creed wrote:WOW! EO almost having a breakdown due to some regular people who express their opinions on a public forum.

Personal opinions that differ from mine in relation to a fact or a real-world event that both parties concede happened, is perfectly fine by me.

A personal opinion that is not only highly derogatory in nature, but is also borne from nothing but pure ignorance, well... that's just unacceptable.

Please !

asdfjkl wrote:Still, Breazeale is loads faster, stronger, bigger and similar skilled compared to Stiverne, he can't possibly lose that fight against Stiverne :s?

Breazeale isnt loads faster than anyone.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:Still, Breazeale is loads faster, stronger, bigger and similar skilled compared to Stiverne, he can't possibly lose that fight against Stiverne :s?

Breazeale isnt loads faster than anyone.

Well, judge for yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZiRI2tAes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jdvXyEj9C0

And I also rate Ugonoh far far far above Stiverne actually. And remember, the Stiverne in this figth was the Stiverne in his prime, like over 6 years ago!

apollo creed wrote:Stiverne
Miller
Breazeale
C. Martin

..tough, tough challenges for Wilder.

Miller might be. The others? Not so much.

asdfjkl wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:Still, Breazeale is loads faster, stronger, bigger and similar skilled compared to Stiverne, he can't possibly lose that fight against Stiverne :s?

Breazeale isnt loads faster than anyone.

And I also rate Ugonoh far far far above Stiverne actually. And remember, the Stiverne in this figth was the Stiverne in his prime, like over 6 years ago!

I rate Breazeale after that fight too.
He fought a dicilpined plan. The old classic. Let the guy who has had a string of easy beats punch himself out and take him when he is tired. It's a time tested strategy that takes a lot of faith to adhere. And he did it perfectly and pulled off what most thought was a bit of an upset. Sure he lost to AJ, no shame in that, but Breazeale is just as relevant as Whyte, it's just he dosent gave Hearn to push him forward

In an ideal world?

Wilder vs Browne, Helenius, or the Parker/Fury winner

Ossyrules wrote:

Badhusker wrote:

Ossyrules wrote:
Eddie Hearn has said that if it wasn't the Wlad rematch, the ibf have mandated Joshua to fight pulev

Keep pitching up your wilder bias vs Joshua anti and I'll keep hitting them out

Or maybe give it a rest and get out of Wilders arse. "Wilders willing to step up..." is hilirious considering career so far

Like I said, and apparently you don't understand....is that Joshua has BOTH been threatened by the IBF and WBA to be stripped. Joshua has TWO mandatories, but they are only considering the IBF. IBF's belt does not trump any other belt. It comes down to who he choses to fight. WBA has also mandated that Joshua fight Ortiz next, which is holding up Ortiz signing to fight Wilder.

You are such a effing blind idiot when it comes to Wilder. You keep trying at "hitting them out" as I pitch what you say is Wilder bias. When you come up with something logical, I will acknowledge it. It isn't a joke that Wilder wants to fight Joshua or Ortiz, but to guys that hate Wilder like yourself, it is. People like you do not want Wilder to get a chance against Joshua or Ortiz, or you will have to backtrack and say you are wrong.

Take a step back and look at things from a neutral standpoint, and forget the hate. Come back with a logical argument, or do not respond. I'm tired of your stupid effing bs, that is based on nothing other than Wilder hate. Ortiz and Joshua may KO Wilder. I just want to see it. You do not.

You're hilarious mate with that last post

Hearn has that it was always the IBF mandatory if not the Wlad fight

I can't wait for wilder or Ortiz to fight Joshua. In the mean time Joshua is fighting one of the other better heavyweight contenders

You quoting being neutral is amazing. Take your own advice. Every post you make has a positive wilder spin and a slant against Joshua.

Understand the themes of their careers so far and you'll get a picture for each of they ambitions. Until then keep crawling up Wilders arse.

I didn't think you would come back with an intelligent response. You are truly a dumb fuckk.

asdfjkl wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:Still, Breazeale is loads faster, stronger, bigger and similar skilled compared to Stiverne, he can't possibly lose that fight against Stiverne :s?

Breazeale isnt loads faster than anyone.

Well, judge for yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZiRI2tAes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jdvXyEj9C0

And I also rate Ugonoh far far far above Stiverne actually. And remember, the Stiverne in this figth was the Stiverne in his prime, like over 6 years ago!

I've already judged you wrong.

KiwiRider wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Breazeale isnt loads faster than anyone.

And I also rate Ugonoh far far far above Stiverne actually. And remember, the Stiverne in this figth was the Stiverne in his prime, like over 6 years ago!

I rate Breazeale after that fight too.
He fought a dicilpined plan. The old classic. Let the guy who has had a string of easy beats punch himself out and take him when he is tired. It's a time tested strategy that takes a lot of faith to adhere. And he did it perfectly and pulled off what most thought was a bit of an upset. Sure he lost to AJ, no shame in that, but Breazeale is just as relevant as Whyte, it's just he dosent gave Hearn to push him forward

Do you find him to be fast?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

KiwiRider wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: And I also rate Ugonoh far far far above Stiverne actually. And remember, the Stiverne in this figth was the Stiverne in his prime, like over 6 years ago!

I rate Breazeale after that fight too.
He fought a dicilpined plan. The old classic. Let the guy who has had a string of easy beats punch himself out and take him when he is tired. It's a time tested strategy that takes a lot of faith to adhere. And he did it perfectly and pulled off what most thought was a bit of an upset. Sure he lost to AJ, no shame in that, but Breazeale is just as relevant as Whyte, it's just he dosent gave Hearn to push him forward

Do you find him to be fast?

Nope. Not particularly fast, not slow either, durable maybe, potential for improvement and higher level of fitness definitely. But I rate him a bit higher than most. I put him on my HW top 10 list towards 10

I like him, balls for days. He's just incredibly slow.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Breazeale isnt loads faster than anyone.

Well, judge for yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZiRI2tAes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jdvXyEj9C0

And I also rate Ugonoh far far far above Stiverne actually. And remember, the Stiverne in this figth was the Stiverne in his prime, like over 6 years ago!

I've already judged you wrong.

"Judging me wrong"? Oke, well let's see about that, appearantly there's a fair chance of this fight actually happening.

I can't imagine anything in that fight telling g you anything you already don't know. If Dominic had any semblance of speed he'd be top 5 for sure. Really slow and plodding. Though it doesn't surprise me coming from you.