BoxRec

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:In about a month we'll establish that lubin is better than jermell.

Lackeos wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:In about a month we'll establish that lubin is better than jermell.

Will we?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I totally disagree that jermell is the better Charlo. Lubin Vs jermell could be a big one down the road. Erickson wins this one fairly convincingly.

Tanzio wrote:

apollo creed wrote:

Best Coast wrote: Charlo by competitive but clearcut decision. Lubin just doesnt have the experience against top-notch competition but will still acquit himself well. His time will come and he gets major respect for taking a title shot so early in his pro career (even though he's been pro almost 4 years his 18 foes lack a legit top 20 contender).

Charlo may have his hands full with Lubin.

Replace "may have" with "has."

Tanzio wrote:He did look smaller. Why does Yamanaka come to mind?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I don't know what his cut is like, but he looked a good bit smaller. Maybe a move down to 47 is in order. He can still be a factor.