BoxRec

Yep, compared to Lemieux, Canelo is a slapper. I suspect that his chin is also not as good.

Kalan wrote:

Ossyrules wrote:You provide no counter to my age remark

We all age... But boxers with greater knowledge and skill age better... Their technical skills carry them when their physicality is compromised... So Oscar was done at 34 and Floyd carried on for a few more years... As usual he made adjustments.

We all age, certain fighting styles lend themselves to longevity, others typically if they are a less technical fighter or rely more on physical talents that feminism with age, don't last at the top so long.

Is Roy Jones a lesser fighter than Hopkins as he was less technical and more reliant on speed and reflexes. The majority will have Roy higher in the ATG stakes despite Hopkins lasting longer.

The facts are that fighters peak and age at variety. Making your obsessions with numbers and quoting ages meaningless in most arguments

No question, canelo is superior to lemieux in every way

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No question, canelo is superior to lemieux in every way

Ha-ha. "Every way", even punching power?

Anyway, after getting dominated by GGG and giving Cotto a rematch, Canelo will likely fight Lemieux, so we shall see.

I'm not sure why I post on CS anymore.

Lemieux is nothing like Tyson, inasasmuchas, Alvarez is nothing like Holyfield.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No question, canelo is superior to lemieux in every way

Not in power.

GGG stalks and KOs Canelo. Alvarez, and Golden Boys Cash Cow has been duped into this fight.

It will be fun (unlike Floyd v Connor) whilst it last, but Canelo will have his lights turned out.