BoxRec

Counter-puncher wrote:

handsofstone wrote:but Golovkin's footwork again put Canelo under pressure constantly

A very wise poster on here suggested to you that may be the case

Don't be that guy
nobody likes that guy

crusader wrote:Punch away

GGG won the fight no doubt but it was a very good fight and the tenth round was championship boxing at its best. If the decision went against Canelo (like it should have) he'd probably have walked away from the bout with more respect because the guy fought a good fight against a top operator. That's sadly being overlooked. Looking forward to the rematch and hope it happens ASAP with minimal fuss!

Ps, and with competent honest officials

I had 116-112. Or more. Alvarez landed some flashy clean shots. But not nearly enough.

I genuinely can't understand how anyone who knows anything about boxing can score that for Canelo.

http://boxing.nv.gov/contact/Contact_Us/

Everyone should email nsac and complain about the result cause that was a disgrace

tobyh5 wrote:

King Tubby wrote:I'm not talking about 'fixing', toby. I assume the governing bodies are not bent and have faith in the ability of their judges. This fight would have been 345/ 339 Canelo. Just wondering how to avoid draws.

Some fights should be a draw. We do not need to avoid draws but we need to avoid incorrect decisions.

You're right, some fights are draws. Not explaining myself very well. Just wondering if there could be an improvement on the 3 Judges system.

King Tubby wrote:

tobyh5 wrote:

King Tubby wrote:I'm not talking about 'fixing', toby. I assume the governing bodies are not bent and have faith in the ability of their judges. This fight would have been 345/ 339 Canelo. Just wondering how to avoid draws.

Some fights should be a draw. We do not need to avoid draws but we need to avoid incorrect decisions.

You're right, some fights are draws. Not explaining myself very well. Just wondering if there could be an improvement on the 3 Judges system.

I think we will always have problems in any sports where the result can be determined by a human decision. All alternatives which I can think of are open to the same problems.

King Tubby wrote:I'm not talking about 'fixing', toby. I assume the governing bodies are not bent and have faith in the ability of their judges. This fight would have been 345/ 339 Canelo. Just wondering how to avoid draws.

5 judges...2 watching out of the arena on screens, no commentary.