Page 2 of 4

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 09:34
by SaadOffTheDeck
I don't know how to say it any clearer. I have no interest in the fight.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 10:47
by Loki
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I don't know how to say it any clearer. I have no interest in the fight.
It could be worse; Briggs vs Oquendo....

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 10:48
by Taansend
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
candyslim wrote:Not for me. Uninteresting is when I'm pretty certain who is going to win. This is no more than a 60/40 whichever one you might favour.
Too each their own. Uninteresting for me is when I couldn't care less who wins. Like here.
And yet you still opened this thread & commented on it. Twice :OhYes:

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 10:49
by Taansend
Taansend wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
candyslim wrote:Not for me. Uninteresting is when I'm pretty certain who is going to win. This is no more than a 60/40 whichever one you might favour.
Too each their own. Uninteresting for me is when I couldn't care less who wins. Like here.
And yet you still opened this thread & commented on it. Twice :OhYes:
Actually a lot more than twice :lol:

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 11:01
by SaadOffTheDeck
Have another one. :roll:

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 13:39
by candyslim
I got that the first time Saad, I was just curious as to why. Don't worry about it I was only making conversation it's no biggie.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 17:40
by KiwiRider
People (myself included) want Miller Vs Whyte. I think this is a good step in that direction. I think Miller needs this fight and maybe one more before he faces someone of Whyte's level.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 17:44
by SaadOffTheDeck
candyslim wrote:I got that the first time Saad, I was just curious as to why. Don't worry about it I was only making conversation it's no biggie.
No worries, I've little interest in heavyweights outside of Joshua and wilder. I'll watch it, maybe the statue and the butterball can change my mind.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 17:45
by Taansend
KiwiRider wrote:People (myself included) want Miller Vs Whyte. I think this is a good step in that direction. I think Miller needs this fight and maybe one more before he faces someone of Whyte's level.
I'd love to see that fight. I like both fighters. I've been impressed with Miller each time I've seen him.

But I think Whyte is hoping for a title shot although the titles seem locked up for the foreseeable future.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 18:14
by KiwiRider
Taansend wrote:
KiwiRider wrote:People (myself included) want Miller Vs Whyte. I think this is a good step in that direction. I think Miller needs this fight and maybe one more before he faces someone of Whyte's level.
I'd love to see that fight. I like both fighters. I've been impressed with Miller each time I've seen him.

But I think Whyte is hoping for a title shot although the titles seem locked up for the foreseeable future.
Totally would love to see Miller/Whyte. And with all the top HW's pretty much booked up until early next year or later, Whyte needs to keep busy. Povitkin is free, but does not seem to have anything in the works.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 21:20
by Ilya Muromets
KiwiRider wrote:
Taansend wrote:
KiwiRider wrote:People (myself included) want Miller Vs Whyte. I think this is a good step in that direction. I think Miller needs this fight and maybe one more before he faces someone of Whyte's level.
I'd love to see that fight. I like both fighters. I've been impressed with Miller each time I've seen him.

But I think Whyte is hoping for a title shot although the titles seem locked up for the foreseeable future.
Totally would love to see Miller/Whyte. And with all the top HW's pretty much booked up until early next year or later, Whyte needs to keep busy. Povitkin is free, but does not seem to have anything in the works.

Povetkin has been blackballed by the western boxing gangsters. Also he just fought in July.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 21:27
by Taansend
x2x wrote:
KiwiRider wrote:
Taansend wrote:
I'd love to see that fight. I like both fighters. I've been impressed with Miller each time I've seen him.

But I think Whyte is hoping for a title shot although the titles seem locked up for the foreseeable future.
Totally would love to see Miller/Whyte. And with all the top HW's pretty much booked up until early next year or later, Whyte needs to keep busy. Povitkin is free, but does not seem to have anything in the works.

Povetkin has been blackballed by the western boxing gangsters. Also he just fought in July.
Were his positive drug tests real or part of something bigger?

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 27 Sep 2017, 22:21
by SaadOffTheDeck
Taansend wrote:
x2x wrote:
KiwiRider wrote: Totally would love to see Miller/Whyte. And with all the top HW's pretty much booked up until early next year or later, Whyte needs to keep busy. Povitkin is free, but does not seem to have anything in the works.

Povetkin has been blackballed by the western boxing gangsters. Also he just fought in July.
Were his positive drug tests real or part of something bigger?
Wilder had that done. I know it's surprising that a guy nobody cares about wields so much power and that he would sabotage what would be 5 times his greatest payday. But that's what happened. Deontay has also ensures that Briggs and spong get nowhere. Monumental evil!

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 02:41
by Ilya Muromets
Taansend wrote:
x2x wrote:
KiwiRider wrote: Totally would love to see Miller/Whyte. And with all the top HW's pretty much booked up until early next year or later, Whyte needs to keep busy. Povitkin is free, but does not seem to have anything in the works.

Povetkin has been blackballed by the western boxing gangsters. Also he just fought in July.
Were his positive drug tests real or part of something bigger?

Doc Margaret Goodman and her traveling Las Vegas drug testing circus. Las Vegas. That's all you need to know: Las Vegas. Notice how none of the in-crowd with the "connections" ever gets harried by Doctor Margaret.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 03:12
by candyslim
Stop it you two. Don't think for yourself, don't question what you've been told. The powers that be say that Povetkin failed a drug test, in fact not just one. That nice Mr Haymon and that nice Mr Sulaiman, you don't imagine they'd lie to you do you? What's wrong with you people?

Just be a good citizen and don't rock the boat.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 03:45
by Ilya Muromets
candyslim wrote:Stop it you two. Don't think for yourself, don't question what you've been told. The powers that be say that Povetkin failed a drug test, in fact not just one. That nice Mr Haymon and that nice Mr Sulaiman, you don't imagine they'd lie to you do you? What's wrong with you people?

Just be a good citizen and don't rock the boat.

Good point. Nice people like that and Doc Goodman would never lie to us. Silly me.

PS You can go online and look up doctor reviews and see what Doctor Margaret Goodman's Las Vegas patients actually have to say about her. It's not pretty.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 03:57
by candyslim
I'm sure they're all drug fiends, senile, and/ or have a hidden agenda. Their testimony can be safely discounted.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 04:01
by Ilya Muromets
candyslim wrote:I'm sure they're all drug fiends, senile, and/ or have a hidden agenda. Their testimony can be safely discounted.


You are speaking of Haymon, Sulaiman, and Goodman, right? Well yeah, but they also have some wonderful qualities, like for instance they have a lot of money.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 04:04
by candyslim
I was talking about those commenting about the good doctor and I cannot deny I may have been a little ironic :D

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 04:07
by Ilya Muromets
candyslim wrote:I was talking about those commenting about the good doctor and I cannot deny I may have been a little ironic :D

I know, but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Image

Would you buy a used car from this man?

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 04:11
by Ilya Muromets
Some patient reviews for Doctor Goodman:


-Ana in Las Vegas, NV | Jan 17, 2016
I was a young girl when I went to see Goodman. After being made to wait a month in duress with serious medical symptoms, I was completely written off and treated very disrespectfully in the process. I even overheard Goodman's jealous receptionist making fun of me to Goodman through the door while I waited to be seen. Goodman didn't listen or help, and missed the diagnosis of a major neurological problem. I've since been treated by a COMPETENT Dr., which Margaret Goodman is not.



Mar 19, 2016
This is the doctor that first shattered my faith in the medical field. First I am young and she had to break a life altering diagnosis. MS is not the easiest thing to be told the test came back, for sure, you have MS especially over the phone. Seriously!?! I was on my way to work... Ruined my expectations of any bedside manner. She also kept prescribing medicine I did not want, or were addictive. Because they have the highest kickbacks. She's all about the money... Avoid!!!!


-LD in Las Vegas, NV | Jun 28, 2016
Refuse to see me because I've seen another neurologist even though she suggested it also didn't even care about my health problems

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 04:15
by Ilya Muromets
Image


How about this man? Would you buy a used car from him?


Oh...Wach and Big Baby. I don't know. I like Big Baby but I was thinking Wach by KO but now I'm thinking Big Baby. I dunno. Good fight!

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 04:33
by candyslim
I'm just hoping the Nascimento fight was a blip and that Mariusz has enough left to make it interesting.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 15:07
by KiwiRider
Just an update to the Miller/Whyte thing.
Eddie did try to get that to happen, waved mega bucks about, and Miller turned it down in favour of Wach...
Which is probably a good decision. I'm not sure he is quite ready for it.

Re: Jarrell Miller Mariusz Wach

Posted: 28 Sep 2017, 15:44
by funso banjo baby
I honestly cant call this.

Miller is untested and carrying way too much fat but moves well.

Wach also is huge but with ok hand speed if a little light punching....but he's been tested albeit losing in hard fights over distance.

Can Miller stop Wach or go into the deep water?

I don't know but its a good fight on paper...unless Wach is all done now and folds with the first punch thrown. That's a possibility too