Re: Alexander Povetkin returns 15.12
Posted: 10 Oct 2017, 06:26
It makes sense.stellar wrote:Probably Hammer
I want to see what Povitkin has left, Hammer is a good test.
It makes sense.stellar wrote:Probably Hammer
I would love to have this site's controls at my finger tips because I would push out a bogus OP about Povetkin and then take ALL of the people that commented on it and firewall them out of the site forever and this would be a far better place. How great would that be?Stuarty30 wrote:Also a drugs cheatasdfjkl wrote:Povetkin is the rank 2 of the heavyweight division, he's the 2nd best heavyweight boxer over the past 10 years with the rank 1 being retired. If you don't care about boxers then it's better that you leave this site.caldo2025 wrote:
You guys need to go away and stop mucking up this site with this crap. Seriously, go find something else to do you dopes. Just what we need ANOTHER post about Povetkin..the most insignificant fighter in boxing.
Well, wouldn't that include you too Caldo?caldo2025 wrote:I would love to have this site's controls at my finger tips because I would push out a bogus OP about Povetkin and then take ALL of the people that commented on it and firewall them out of the site forever and this would be a far better place. How great would that be?Stuarty30 wrote:Also a drugs cheatasdfjkl wrote: Povetkin is the rank 2 of the heavyweight division, he's the 2nd best heavyweight boxer over the past 10 years with the rank 1 being retired. If you don't care about boxers then it's better that you leave this site.
Oh i'd be a martyr for the site...they would talk about me for years and make a huge statue of me somewhere.Badhusker wrote:Well, wouldn't that include you too Caldo?caldo2025 wrote:I would love to have this site's controls at my finger tips because I would push out a bogus OP about Povetkin and then take ALL of the people that commented on it and firewall them out of the site forever and this would be a far better place. How great would that be?Stuarty30 wrote:
Also a drugs cheat![]()
I think Povetkin and Ortiz should fight. Battle of the juicers.
Come on now, I'm as dubious about Wilder as the next man, but it wasn't Wilder's fault that fight didn't go ahead.asdfjkl wrote:But who dares to fight him? Wilder certainly not, because he's scared and is still protected heavely.
There are far worse posters.Horse wrote:caldo2025 is a truly awful poster.
yeah i think this fight could be as entertaining as Joshua-Klitscko, it is a shame this fight never happenedcandyslim wrote:dagilechia wrote:Povetkin is 2nd best HW now most likely wins vs Wilder by KO
i bet he fights Helenius or Hammer now and wins by KO, next he aims to fight Parker
What a crying shame we never got the chance to find out. it would have been a great fight. It's funny but I don't recall any of the posters who habitually call me stupid for entertaining the idea that Povetkin was the victim of a conspiracy (almost exclusively Americans) ever express any regret that this intriguing match-up never went ahead.
Even I was a huge fan of Deontay Wilder (I think back then I was a fan, maybe not a huge fan) I would still have been absolutely gutted by the cancellation of this fight.
Glad this site isn't at your control if that's the case! Camel breath!caldo2025 wrote:I would love to have this site's controls at my finger tips because I would push out a bogus OP about Povetkin and then take ALL of the people that commented on it and firewall them out of the site forever and this would be a far better place. How great would that be?Stuarty30 wrote:Also a drugs cheatasdfjkl wrote: Povetkin is the rank 2 of the heavyweight division, he's the 2nd best heavyweight boxer over the past 10 years with the rank 1 being retired. If you don't care about boxers then it's better that you leave this site.
Go HorseHorse wrote:caldo2025 is a truly awful poster.
Well actually, both Ortiz, as well as Povetkin are innocent. Stiverne and Arreola on the other hand...keirw wrote:Come on now, I'm as dubious about Wilder as the next man, but it wasn't Wilder's fault that fight didn't go ahead.asdfjkl wrote:But who dares to fight him? Wilder certainly not, because he's scared and is still protected heavely.
Nor was it his fault the Ortiz fight fell through.
Wilder had a car full of drugs and Stiverne a body full of it, Wilder vs Stiverne is the real battle of the juicers, for those interested. Povetkin vs Ortiz would be the battle of the boxers instead of the papercriminals.Badhusker wrote:Well, wouldn't that include you too Caldo?caldo2025 wrote:I would love to have this site's controls at my finger tips because I would push out a bogus OP about Povetkin and then take ALL of the people that commented on it and firewall them out of the site forever and this would be a far better place. How great would that be?Stuarty30 wrote:
Also a drugs cheat![]()
I think Povetkin and Ortiz should fight. Battle of the juicers.
For someone who wants us to believe FACTSasdfjkl wrote:Well actually, both Ortiz, as well as Povetkin are innocent. Stiverne and Arreola on the other hand...keirw wrote:Come on now, I'm as dubious about Wilder as the next man, but it wasn't Wilder's fault that fight didn't go ahead.asdfjkl wrote:But who dares to fight him? Wilder certainly not, because he's scared and is still protected heavely.
Nor was it his fault the Ortiz fight fell through.
Now we are going to watch the battle of the doping cheaters, Wilder with his car full of drugs and Stiverne with all his doping trash and dopingtest skipping. Bit that's not a problem for the WBC ofcourse.
What do you call the WBC being concerned about Ortiz his health? A joke or something serious?tiny_acres wrote:For someone who wants us to believe FACTSasdfjkl wrote:Well actually, both Ortiz, as well as Povetkin are innocent. Stiverne and Arreola on the other hand...keirw wrote: Come on now, I'm as dubious about Wilder as the next man, but it wasn't Wilder's fault that fight didn't go ahead.
Nor was it his fault the Ortiz fight fell through.
Now we are going to watch the battle of the doping cheaters, Wilder with his car full of drugs and Stiverne with all his doping trash and dopingtest skipping. Bit that's not a problem for the WBC ofcourse.
You calling a misdemeanor worth of marijuana a car full of drugs is not an exaggeration but a bold lie.
In Alabama less than an ounce is a misdemeanor.
Never once said that.asdfjkl wrote:What do you call the WBC being concerned about Ortiz his health? A joke or something serious?tiny_acres wrote:For someone who wants us to believe FACTSasdfjkl wrote: Well actually, both Ortiz, as well as Povetkin are innocent. Stiverne and Arreola on the other hand...
Now we are going to watch the battle of the doping cheaters, Wilder with his car full of drugs and Stiverne with all his doping trash and dopingtest skipping. Bit that's not a problem for the WBC ofcourse.
You calling a misdemeanor worth of marijuana a car full of drugs is not an exaggeration but a bold lie.
In Alabama less than an ounce is a misdemeanor.
No, the WBC just said that, they now admit Ortiz is 100% innocent and from now on say they care about Ortiz his health and say that's the reason why Wilder can't fight Ortiz. And no, that's not a lie.tiny_acres wrote:Never once said that.asdfjkl wrote:What do you call the WBC being concerned about Ortiz his health? A joke or something serious?tiny_acres wrote:
For someone who wants us to believe FACTS
You calling a misdemeanor worth of marijuana a car full of drugs is not an exaggeration but a bold lie.
In Alabama less than an ounce is a misdemeanor.
Correct your lies before telling people to believe your words.
Have a nice day young lad
Don't you always say that the WBC now says they're "100% innocent" after the fight gets called off?asdfjkl wrote:No, the WBC just said that, they now admit Ortiz is 100% innocent and from now on say they care about Ortiz his health and say that's the reason why Wilder can't fight Ortiz. And no, that's not a lie.tiny_acres wrote:Never once said that.asdfjkl wrote: What do you call the WBC being concerned about Ortiz his health? A joke or something serious?
Correct your lies before telling people to believe your words.
Have a nice day young lad
"Manager to Luis Ortiz, Jay Jimenez, wants to clarify the current situation with his fighter and the WBC’s decision to move to a new opponent.gilgamesh wrote:Don't you always say that the WBC now says they're "100% innocent" after the fight gets called off?asdfjkl wrote:No, the WBC just said that, they now admit Ortiz is 100% innocent and from now on say they care about Ortiz his health and say that's the reason why Wilder can't fight Ortiz. And no, that's not a lie.tiny_acres wrote:
Never once said that.
Correct your lies before telling people to believe your words.
Have a nice day young lad
Do you actually believe your own bullsh*t?
tiny_acres wrote:There are far worse posters.Horse wrote:caldo2025 is a truly awful poster.
I may not agree with most of his posts but I like him.
I only have 2 on ignore. He's not close to that level
My Christmas wish this year is that whomever Povetkin the pin cushion fights on 12.15...I don't care who it is...I just hope he beats Povetkin down because I'd love to see what happens to the Povetkin Pumpkin Girls on this site. Hilarious. Will they still have their pom poms out? What excuses will they make? I can't wait. I'd watch but their's no way that will be on TV here in the states. We actually like entertainment over here.Stuarty30 wrote:Glad this site isn't at your control if that's the case! Camel breath!caldo2025 wrote:I would love to have this site's controls at my finger tips because I would push out a bogus OP about Povetkin and then take ALL of the people that commented on it and firewall them out of the site forever and this would be a far better place. How great would that be?Stuarty30 wrote:
Also a drugs cheat