Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 05:13
he's 5'11. you can't even get simple stuff like this right.Kalan wrote:
But Groves is tall .
BoxRec
EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Page 2 of 2
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 05:14
Yes good post from Kalan, and good on you both for affirming him when he's correct.Ossyrules wrote:Spot on from kalanCounter-puncher wrote:AgreedKalan wrote:
Groves has power.. That was proven in the Froch fight when he put Froch on his ass
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 05:15
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 06:49
Groves has no power? You high. Fvck, fake news rife of whatKalan wrote:Groves has no power.. That was proven in the Jack fight when Badou walked through him.. His chin isn't real good.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Just about right, pick em fight. The unknown is if Eubank can take Groves power.
But Groves is tall and has been fighting at Super Middleweight for a long time.. This is the first veteran contender Eubank has faced at 168 so he can't go in there with his head up his ass.. But Eubank has come a long way since his loss to Saunders where he performed like a rookie -- so I don't think cockiness is necessarily going to be a major issue.. You can't be full of yourself versus a veteran fighter and Eubank tends to be cock-sure.
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 06:49
Groves hits like a fvcking mule
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 07:00
Tricky fight to pick
Slightly leaning towards groves
Slightly leaning towards groves
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 13:58
I was there when he did Smithdanconnollyeire wrote:Groves hits like a fvcking mule
Smith legs were fvcked for MINUTES from that shot
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 15:29
Once again for gigglesKalan wrote:
Groves has no power.
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 15:30
groves isnt a massive hitter imo. but definitely good power. prob among hardest hitting counter punchers today. i think a lot with him is that he also has speed and catches you with shots you dont brace for. when he just tees off on guys its actually when he doesnt get his best stoppages. froch, cox, smith, i think happened when he coutnered.
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:23
Agree with this, if he’s clubbing you and you see it coming it’s not putting you down, but it will break you down slowly. Murray, chudinov, the poor lad who was hospitalised...jamamb wrote:groves isnt a massive hitter imo. but definitely good power. prob among hardest hitting counter punchers today. i think a lot with him is that he also has speed and catches you with shots you dont brace for. when he just tees off on guys its actually when he doesnt get his best stoppages. froch, cox, smith, i think happened when he coutnered.
If he lands the quick counters and you’re not ready it’s lights out
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:39
He's the only fighter I've seen hurt Froch, much less drop him. That says it all.
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:50
It should do.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:He's the only fighter I've seen hurt Froch, much less drop him. That says it all.
Seems to me the guys Groves has taken longer to stop, or have gone the distance, are tight-guard dudes who don't let their hands go much, Jack and Murray and Gutnecht come to mind anyway.
And what he did to Paul Smith?
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:52
Jermain Taylor dropped FrochSaadOffTheDeck wrote:He's the only fighter I've seen hurt Froch, much less drop him. That says it all.
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:53
Ah good reminder that one did hurt Froch. Not as badly as Pavlik was hurt by Taylor but definitely a legit KDgilgamesh wrote:Jermain Taylor dropped FrochSaadOffTheDeck wrote:He's the only fighter I've seen hurt Froch, much less drop him. That says it all.
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:54
yes although froch more hurt against groves. took several rounds to recover and only time ive seen him look that weary and maybe even gun shy for a few. was like 'oh shit!'
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:55
Yeah he was definitely hurt worse against Groves.
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:55
Indeed. Groves hits hard enough to have an ATG chin on rubber legs for about 4 roundsjamamb wrote:yes although froch more hurt against groves. took several rounds to recover and only time ive seen him look that weary and maybe even gun shy for a few. was like 'oh poo!'
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 20 Oct 2017, 17:59
I think you're right therejamamb wrote:groves isnt a massive hitter imo. but definitely good power. prob among hardest hitting counter punchers today. i think a lot with him is that he also has speed and catches you with shots you dont brace for. when he just tees off on guys its actually when he doesnt get his best stoppages. froch, cox, smith, i think happened when he coutnered.
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 21 Oct 2017, 05:48
Kalan clearly mistaken Cleverly for Groves.
Tall and carries no power?
Tall and carries no power?
Re: EUBANK JR 6-5 over GROVES---too hi or too
Posted: 21 Oct 2017, 07:11
i wouldn't be so sure mate, this is the guy who says Hagler couldn't box and Sugar Ray Robinson was a brawler.lillywhite14 wrote:Kalan clearly mistaken Cleverly for Groves.
Tall and carries no power?