SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Autobarn wrote:Lennox won both fights. First, 8-3-1 and second 7-4-1 IMO.
Lennox won, but I didn’t like his boxing, only wanting to neutralise. He fought in a strange kind of squatting position, which looked very awkward. He didn’t throw enough punches. Just wanted to use the reach and not make a statement.
Holyfield boxed very well in the second fight but couldn’t get close enough, often enough.
Lennox’s real fights were against Klitschko and Briggs. Often, Life does not follow the script, because the Holyfield fights were supposed to be the epic battles, the exciting fights...
It was smart, if they would have been epic battles Lennox would have lost. The Mercer fight was very good, he learned a lesson there. He also doesn't get enough credit for that fight.
A 1992 fight between Holyfield and Lewis could’ve been amazing. I think the heavyweight money had got to their heads a little. They were reckless, totally irresponsible in their defenses, throwing power punches with abandon and thought they could walk through anything.
But I can’t complain about Holyfield v Bowe, which developed into one of the best ever rivalries, but delivering 3 of 3 great fights.
Back to Lewis v Holyfield, I think Lennox got it perfect for the first 5 rounds of the first fight. Box sensibly, weather Evander’s mini rally, find the range and drop the bombs. Lewis unloaded on Holyfield to head and body in the fifth, and Evander had a startled look on his face - never seen him look that way before or after - but then Lewis went into his shell, throwing as many feints and air jabs as genuine punches (something Thomas Hearns did in his own controversial draw, versus Sugar Ray Leonard in an admittedly very good 1989 fight)...