Page 2 of 3
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 17:38
by SaadOffTheDeck
Ossyrules wrote:Jip wrote:You dont understand what i mean so i will make myself clear.
If you want to compare the highest form of greatness than lets just take the greatest athlete of all.
Michael jordan. ~18 year career. 18 years of being in A+ shape, 18 years with the mindset of perfection, still to this considered the goat of basketball, most lists rank him goat of any sports.
So what did tyson and ali do?
Ali. ~8 years in shape, being the best p4p, winning against liston. The rest, ~12 years a mix of legal problems, boxing pause, the mindeset of not wanting to train hard, being out of shape, struggling against foremon, losing to frazier and getting gift descisions.
Tyson. ~9 years of perfection looking as impressiv as any athlete has ever looked. The rest, 11 years of jail, legal problems, the mindeset of eating ice cream & vagina and being a loser.
Now you tell me who had a more goat like career. Dempsey, ali amd tyson were all megastars, but compare their career with jordan or messi and it just isnt the same.
You guys are very contradicting yourself. You always say how important a long career, staying in shape is, but than forget that a lot of years of tysons and alis career were awful compared to other greats like federer, jordan, messi.
Michael Jordan is big and has been marketed even bigger. There’s people with more bball knowledge than me here, but any conversation I have re basketball and Jordan never gets the goat nod
Messi is an unreal footballer. I’m huge football fan. Messis stardom will never come close to Ali though. Neither has maradona, CR7, R9, pele probably closest.
Ali is on another level
Jordan is definitely the greatest ever. Ali isn't.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 17:58
by Ossyrules
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ossyrules wrote:Jip wrote:You dont understand what i mean so i will make myself clear.
If you want to compare the highest form of greatness than lets just take the greatest athlete of all.
Michael jordan. ~18 year career. 18 years of being in A+ shape, 18 years with the mindset of perfection, still to this considered the goat of basketball, most lists rank him goat of any sports.
So what did tyson and ali do?
Ali. ~8 years in shape, being the best p4p, winning against liston. The rest, ~12 years a mix of legal problems, boxing pause, the mindeset of not wanting to train hard, being out of shape, struggling against foremon, losing to frazier and getting gift descisions.
Tyson. ~9 years of perfection looking as impressiv as any athlete has ever looked. The rest, 11 years of jail, legal problems, the mindeset of eating ice cream & vagina and being a loser.
Now you tell me who had a more goat like career. Dempsey, ali amd tyson were all megastars, but compare their career with jordan or messi and it just isnt the same.
You guys are very contradicting yourself. You always say how important a long career, staying in shape is, but than forget that a lot of years of tysons and alis career were awful compared to other greats like federer, jordan, messi.
Michael Jordan is big and has been marketed even bigger. There’s people with more bball knowledge than me here, but any conversation I have re basketball and Jordan never gets the goat nod
Messi is an unreal footballer. I’m huge football fan. Messis stardom will never come close to Ali though. Neither has maradona, CR7, R9, pele probably closest.
Ali is on another level
Jordan is definitely the greatest ever. Ali isn't.
Ok
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:02
by funso banjo baby
we've had Louis and Ali and Sugar Ray
but when are we going to get someone good?

Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:05
by Covfefe
Muhammad Ali is cultural icon, arguably the biggest of the twentieth century.
How much bigger do you want these guys to get?
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:05
by Jip
Ossyrules wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ossyrules wrote:
Michael Jordan is big and has been marketed even bigger. There’s people with more bball knowledge than me here, but any conversation I have re basketball and Jordan never gets the goat nod
Messi is an unreal footballer. I’m huge football fan. Messis stardom will never come close to Ali though. Neither has maradona, CR7, R9, pele probably closest.
Ali is on another level
Jordan is definitely the greatest ever. Ali isn't.
Ok
Cant you answermy question?
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:30
by Impractical Poster
Jip wrote:Impractical Poster wrote:Jip wrote:
You guys are very contradicting yourself. You always say how important a long career, staying in shape is, but than forget that a lot of years of tysons and alis career were awful compared to other greats like federer, jordan, messi.
Boxing is different though. These guys aren't getting pounded in the skull every time they play their sport. And those sports are set up for those guys to face the best in their sport at least once a year. Comparing these sports to boxing is like apples and oranges. If you are looking for someone in a combat sport to match the criteria you put forth and set with basketball, tennis, and futball stars, you will never ever, not in a million years have a megastar is boxing.
Finaly a good reasonable answer.
You are right. Playing and getting punched in the head are 2 different things. But you have to aggree that staying in shape, having the mindset of perfection and traini g at the highest level any athlete can do boxer and non boxer right?
Look at pacquiao, always in shape trained like possessed, always the desire to win, always faced the best, climbed divisions like it was nothing. That is the closest career of a goat like career for a boxer. And had floyd been a Spectacular enyojing to watch boxer than floyd would ve been in the conversation. Cause in Terme of training atitude, longvidity and brilliance no one can deny he was superb.
Imagine somebody with the skills of prime jones and the training atitude of mayweather and marketebility of de la hoya. That would be a guy above jordan.
I have to admit, I'm not up on the older fighters like that. Not even Ali. I assumed he was in shape when he was on top.
Either way, your criteria for what makes a megastar is different than most. Worldwide I'd assume Ali is more of an icon than any other sporting star in the past 100 years. To me, that is the ultimate megastar.
Sure, i guess you could say he wasnt the most dedicated. Which I am not qualified to argue. But maybe you should change your thread title to dedicated instead of megastar.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:35
by Jip
Covfefe wrote:Muhammad Ali is cultural icon, arguably the biggest of the twentieth century.
How much bigger do you want these guys to get?
Just because billions of people have an oppinion, doesnt mean that they are right.
For a long time millions of people thought the earth was flat and they were wrong.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:36
by Covfefe
Jip wrote:Covfefe wrote:Muhammad Ali is cultural icon, arguably the biggest of the twentieth century.
How much bigger do you want these guys to get?
Just because billions of people have an oppinion, doesnt mean that they are right.
For a long time millions of people thought the earth was flat and they were wrong.
So Ali wasn’t a megastar?
Do me a favour.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:41
by lazboy
Seems like you are looking for an infallible human icon. Someone who has megastardum plus great/amazing boxing skills yet they must meet your criteria for not being boring and they need to reign for decades with an unblemished record and unwavering commitment to training and appeal to the general public. That’s not realistic. Boxers are humans. Boxing is a brutal and young mans sport. I really think you need to get real, get laid and get off the glue.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:42
by Jip
Impractical Poster wrote:Jip wrote:Impractical Poster wrote:
Boxing is different though. These guys aren't getting pounded in the skull every time they play their sport. And those sports are set up for those guys to face the best in their sport at least once a year. Comparing these sports to boxing is like apples and oranges. If you are looking for someone in a combat sport to match the criteria you put forth and set with basketball, tennis, and futball stars, you will never ever, not in a million years have a megastar is boxing.
Finaly a good reasonable answer.
You are right. Playing and getting punched in the head are 2 different things. But you have to aggree that staying in shape, having the mindset of perfection and traini g at the highest level any athlete can do boxer and non boxer right?
Look at pacquiao, always in shape trained like possessed, always the desire to win, always faced the best, climbed divisions like it was nothing. That is the closest career of a goat like career for a boxer. And had floyd been a Spectacular enyojing to watch boxer than floyd would ve been in the conversation. Cause in Terme of training atitude, longvidity and brilliance no one can deny he was superb.
Imagine somebody with the skills of prime jones and the training atitude of mayweather and marketebility of de la hoya. That would be a guy above jordan.
I have to admit, I'm not up on the older fighters like that. Not even Ali. I assumed he was in shape when he was on top.
Either way, your criteria for what makes a megastar is different than most. Worldwide I'd assume Ali is more of an icon than any other sporting star in the past 100 years. To me, that is the ultimate megastar.
Sure, i guess you could say he wasnt the most dedicated. Which I am not qualified to argue. But maybe you should change your thread title to dedicated instead of megastar.
To late. I made my point clear.
Yes ali, tyson were all megastars at some point.
But they didnt have the near perfect and long career of jordan or messi.
Being at the top for 8 years like tyson and ali is just a bit poor compared to federer who has been brilliant for 15 years.
The correct thread title wouldbe been
Boxing never had a MEGASTAR with a GOAT like career and longvidity.
Tyson was mostly out of shape and in jail. And ali had lay offs and not a good training atitude.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:46
by Jip
lazboy wrote:Seems like you are looking for an infallible human icon. Someone who has megastardum plus great/amazing boxing skills yet they must meet your criteria for not being boring and they need to reign for decades with an unblemished record and unwavering commitment to training and appeal to the general public. That’s not realistic. Boxers are humans. Boxing is a brutal and young mans sport. I really think you need to get real, get laid and get off the glue.
Correct.
Is michael jordan winning 6 rings and being considered the best since 1980s realistic. Is climbing 10 divisions while being succesful like pac realistic.
Extraordinary people do extraordinary things.
Tyson or ali had the chance to be the goat. Had both had a passionat training atitude than guess what wouldve happened.
What wouldve happened had tyson not been to jail and trained hardcore instead of eating burgers and havone onenightstands?
He would have stayed in shape fu;_ed up moorer, holyfield, bowe and lewis with people talking about tyson with higher regards over jordan!
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:50
by Impractical Poster
Jip wrote:Impractical Poster wrote:Jip wrote:
Finaly a good reasonable answer.
You are right. Playing and getting punched in the head are 2 different things. But you have to aggree that staying in shape, having the mindset of perfection and traini g at the highest level any athlete can do boxer and non boxer right?
Look at pacquiao, always in shape trained like possessed, always the desire to win, always faced the best, climbed divisions like it was nothing. That is the closest career of a goat like career for a boxer. And had floyd been a Spectacular enyojing to watch boxer than floyd would ve been in the conversation. Cause in Terme of training atitude, longvidity and brilliance no one can deny he was superb.
Imagine somebody with the skills of prime jones and the training atitude of mayweather and marketebility of de la hoya. That would be a guy above jordan.
I have to admit, I'm not up on the older fighters like that. Not even Ali. I assumed he was in shape when he was on top.
Either way, your criteria for what makes a megastar is different than most. Worldwide I'd assume Ali is more of an icon than any other sporting star in the past 100 years. To me, that is the ultimate megastar.
Sure, i guess you could say he wasnt the most dedicated. Which I am not qualified to argue. But maybe you should change your thread title to dedicated instead of megastar.
To late. I made my point clear.
Yes ali, tyson were all megastars at some point.
But they didnt have the near perfect and long career of jordan or messi.
Being at the top for 8 years like tyson and ali is just a bit poor compared to federer who has been brilliant for 15 years.
The correct thread title wouldbe been
Boxing never had a MEGASTAR with a GOAT like career and longvidity.
Tyson was mostly out of shape and in jail. And ali had lay offs and not a good training atitude.
Like i said, Federer isn't getting pounded in the head either. So your comparison is unfair and unreasonable.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:54
by Impractical Poster
Jip, considering your definition of megastar, why wouldn't Manny be one?
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:55
by Jip
Impractical Poster wrote:Jip, considering your definition of megastar, why wouldn't Manny be one?
Yup. He is one.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:23
by gilgamesh
Jip wrote:Impractical Poster wrote:Jip, considering your definition of megastar, why wouldn't Manny be one?
Yup. He is one.
So then your thread title is bullsh*t, and you never meant what you yourself said?
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:30
by Jip
gilgamesh wrote:Jip wrote:Impractical Poster wrote:Jip, considering your definition of megastar, why wouldn't Manny be one?
Yup. He is one.
So then your thread title is bullsh*t, and you never meant what you yourself said?
Dude. Why are you so closed minded?
One day green is my favourite coulur, the next day ot might be blue.
I think i got my point accross and the non stupid folks get it
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:30
by Covfefe
He’s not close minded. You’re just fornicating wrong.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:31
by gilgamesh
Jip wrote:
Dude. Why are you so closed minded?
One day green is my favourite coulur, the next day ot might be blue.
I think i got my point accross and the non stupid folks get it
You didn't get any point across. Even poorly. You didn't even seem to know what your own point was apparently.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:33
by lazboy
Covfefe wrote:He’s not close minded. You’re just effing wrong.
And he’s dumb. Don’t forget that please.
Edit: Just to make it crystal clear I was talking about Jip. Jips dumb.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:38
by Jip
gilgamesh wrote:Jip wrote:
Dude. Why are you so closed minded?
One day green is my favourite coulur, the next day ot might be blue.
I think i got my point accross and the non stupid folks get it
You didn't get any point across. Even poorly. You didn't even seem to know what your own point was apparently.
I did.
Most understood.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:40
by Jip
lazboy wrote:Covfefe wrote:He’s not close minded. You’re just effing wrong.
And he’s dumb. Don’t forget that please.
fornicate off
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:40
by gilgamesh
Ok...let's ask the people.
Jip said Boxing never had a megastar in his eyes, and then said Manny Pacquiao was a megastar...did he have a point everybody?
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:41
by lazboy
Jip wrote:lazboy wrote:Covfefe wrote:He’s not close minded. You’re just effing wrong.
And he’s dumb. Don’t forget that please.
eff off
I re-edited what I wrote,. Have a look.
Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:42
by gilgamesh
lazboy wrote:Jip wrote:lazboy wrote:
And he’s dumb. Don’t forget that please.
eff off
I re-edited what I wrote,. Have a look.

Re: Boxing never had a megastar in my eyes
Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 19:49
by Jip
gilgamesh wrote:Ok...let's ask the people.
Jip said Boxing never had a megastar in his eyes, and then said Manny Pacquiao was a megastar...did he have a point everybody?
You a smart arse. You pick on anton for being a cleverguy smartarse while you top him easily.
What part didnt you get?
Can oppinions change in a discussion or is everything set in stone ones they say it?