Page 2 of 2
Re: Why should Lomachenko get praise?
Posted: 15 Dec 2017, 09:24
by IronFrost
Ricky_ wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 06:21
IronFrost wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 05:45
Ricky_ wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 04:27
Ironfrost is
the Brut.
Badhusker is
A Brut.
The only real difference is grammar.
My English is not good at all because i am from Europe ;)
What/who is Brut. I have no idea ;)
If i were you I'd be too embarrassed to admit it also.
I have notting to admit you idiot. I am not some fuking Brut or whoever.
Re: Why should Lomachenko get praise?
Posted: 15 Dec 2017, 10:21
by Ricky_
Tanzio wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 09:17
Ricky_ wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 08:59
Tanzio wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 08:55

Like I said, you are just that dumb.
OhYes, you keep good company Tanzio. OhYes.

Don’t blame me, alt reichmeister, I can’t get you off the sole of my shoe.
Maybe you should buy some better friends just like how you bought a russian prostitute for a bride?
Re: Why should Lomachenko get praise?
Posted: 15 Dec 2017, 11:50
by Tanzio
Ricky_ wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 10:21
Tanzio wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 09:17
Ricky_ wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 08:59
OhYes, you keep good company Tanzio. OhYes.

Don’t blame me, alt reichmeister, I can’t get you off the sole of my shoe.
Maybe you should buy some better friends just like how you bought a russian prostitute for a bride?

Resorting to the popular
Insult Tanzio’s Wife strategy used to death by Boxrec nogamers like you.
What pornstar did you fantasize about the last time the person who wears the pants in your hovel allowed your fishbait to get something besides a short rub between your thumb and your fore finger? You probably can’t remember that long ago, right TriggereDicky_?
Re: Why should Lomachenko get praise?
Posted: 15 Dec 2017, 12:55
by Ricky_
Tanzio wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 11:50
Ricky_ wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 10:21
Tanzio wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 09:17

Don’t blame me, alt reichmeister, I can’t get you off the sole of my shoe.
Maybe you should buy some better friends just like how you bought a russian prostitute for a bride?

Resorting to the popular
Insult Tanzio’s Wife strategy used to death by Boxrec nogamers like you.
What pornstar did you fantasize about the last time the person who wears the pants in your hovel allowed your fishbait to get something besides a short rub between your thumb and your fore finger? You probably can’t remember that long ago, right TriggereDicky_?
I performed like a stallion last night Tanzio, thanks for asking. An old gramps like you couldn't mustur up the testosterone to please your woman like i could, and even with the bucket load of viagra that you'd need to get some blood flow to your wretched old salami - you'd probably only give yourself a hernia anyway.
Re: Why should Lomachenko get praise?
Posted: 15 Dec 2017, 13:08
by Kalan
IronFrost wrote: ↑14 Dec 2017, 17:57
Jip wrote: ↑14 Dec 2017, 17:53
F:&##k ward
people like canelo GGG & loma not because they fight smaller opponents (Which is only half true. G fought bigger jacobs. Canelo fought bigger g. Loma fought bigger salido) but because they are not cheater & boring. They the total opposite. Sensational action packed boxing and box without thousands of low blows, clinching and other dirty stuff.
So what? Ward still showed balls and moved up with his weights. Will Kovalev ever move up?
Funny that most of Lomachenko fans are also fans of Wladimir Klitschko who is one of the biggest cheaters himself ;)))))))
Me neither Chippo... I'll try to reinvigorate the thread and bring it back to Boxing with this reply.
Wladimir wasn't above cheating, but cheating wasn't his game. He had the best jab, straight right, left hook, and footwork in the division. He didn't have a body attack or an inside game, but he didn't need it. He was taller than 96% of his opponents. A prime Wach was bigger and taller with longer arms---but Wlad had the skills to box rings around Wach... He continuously grabbed strong, short guys like Povetkin and Jennings who could work him inside... It wasn't until Fury arrived that his fistic deficits (Steward version of Wald: no inside game and no body attack) were apparent.
Ward was a Light Heavyweight all along... He used advance weight making science to fight a division lower like Canelo did... Mayweather was a true Welterweight who won 3 World Titles at 154... That's moving up... Ward's whole game was cheating: head butts... low blows... leveraging and pushing with the head... shouldering, forearms, elbows...and wrestling... He was the worst cheater in Boxing until he fled the game like a coward... He brought his own referees and judges to the Kovalev fights.
I found it funny that Vivek said the taller Lomachenko would have to tie Rigondeaux up when Rigo fought his way inside... He claimed that holding would be a big part of Lomachenko's strategy when Lomachenko almost never holds... Vivek is one of the dumbest nuts I've ever read who covers Boxing... He's so damned ignorant it's comical.
Re: Why should Lomachenko get praise?
Posted: 15 Dec 2017, 13:13
by Tanzio
Ricky_ wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 12:55
Tanzio wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 11:50
Ricky_ wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 10:21
Maybe you should buy some better friends just like how you bought a russian prostitute for a bride?

Resorting to the popular
Insult Tanzio’s Wife strategy used to death by Boxrec nogamers like you.
What pornstar did you fantasize about the last time the person who wears the pants in your hovel allowed your fishbait to get something besides a short rub between your thumb and your fore finger? You probably can’t remember that long ago, right TriggereDicky_?
I performed like a stallion last night Tanzio, thanks for asking. An old gramps like you couldn't mustur up the testosterone to please your woman like i could, and even with the bucket load of viagra that you'd need to get some blood flow to your wretched old salami - you'd probably only give yourself a hernia anyway.
Was it dwarf or donkey porn, alt reichmeister?
