BoxRec

personally i thought that was a rather clear win even with the kds, as warren did very little after that and was getting mauled. but i actually think you have things about right in your rankings

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:10 Horse your rankings are an absolute joke man. Tyson Fury hasn't fought in almost 3 f*cking years. What the hell is wrong with you?

Is he your Brother in Law or something? Did he loan you money?

It's nowhere near three years yet.

Stop coming into these threads telling lies.

Horse wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:24

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:10 Horse your rankings are an absolute joke man. Tyson Fury hasn't fought in almost 3 f*cking years. What the hell is wrong with you?

Is he your Brother in Law or something? Did he loan you money?

It's nowhere near three years yet.

Stop coming into these threads telling lies.

His last fight was November 2015. This is the 3rd calendar year that's ticked by without him in the ring.

Tyson Fury is by EVERY logical definition an inactive fighter. He shouldn't be ranked in the Top 1000 because he's not fighting.

Nothing is a bigger lie than Tyson Fury being ranked as one of the 10 best fighters in England right now. Everybody else on your list should be insulted to their core to be rated below an inactive, fat cokehead.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:24His last fight was July 2015. It's 2 and a half years. That's pretty near 3 years.

Tyson Fury is by EVERY logical definition an inactive fighter. He shouldn't be ranked in the Top 1000 because he's not fighting.

His last fight was 28th of November 2015.

Why do you keep lying?

Horse wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:28

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:24His last fight was July 2015. It's 2 and a half years. That's pretty near 3 years.

Tyson Fury is by EVERY logical definition an inactive fighter. He shouldn't be ranked in the Top 1000 because he's not fighting.

His last fight was 28th of November 2015.

Why do you keep lying?

I corrected myself. It's been so long it's easy to get mixed up.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:28I corrected myself. It's been so long it's easy to get mixed up.

He's been inactive for a little over 2 years. There's no need to add an extra year to his inactivity.

Horse wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:31

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:28I corrected myself. It's been so long it's easy to get mixed up.

He's been inactive for a little over 2 years. There's no need to add an extra year to his inactivity.

2 years is plenty long enough that he shouldn't be ranked on your or anybody else's list. If you want your list to have credibility take him the f*ck off of it or quit making it because you look like an absolute idiot every time you still rank this guy.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:35 2 years is plenty long enough that he shouldn't be ranked on your or anybody else's list. If you want your list to have credibility take him the f*ck off of it or quit making it because you look like an absolute idiot every time you still rank this guy.

No one else seems as bothered as you.

Maybe you are the one with the problem.

Horse wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:36

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:35 2 years is plenty long enough that he shouldn't be ranked on your or anybody else's list. If you want your list to have credibility take him the f*ck off of it or quit making it because you look like an absolute idiot every time you still rank this guy.

No one else seems as bothered as you.

Maybe you are the one with the problem.

Or maybe everyone else has already written your rankings off as the meaningless list it is.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:37Or maybe everyone else has already written your rankings off as the meaningless list it is.

If you don't like it then don't look at it.

Horse wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:41

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:37Or maybe everyone else has already written your rankings off as the meaningless list it is.

If you don't like it then don't look at it.

Nah I think I'll just bust your balls to pieces every month until you correct your mistake.

Horse wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:11

samwbr wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 11:17 Apart from win fights and earn title shots?

That didn't happen last month.

Brook hasn't fought in 9 or 10 months. The fighters below him are active and winning, it's farcical keeping him above them.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:44Nah I think I'll just bust your balls to pieces every month until you correct your mistake.

Fury will be back soon.

samwbr wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:45 Brook hasn't fought in 9 or 10 months. The fighters below him are active and winning, it's farcical keeping him above them.

No, it isn't.

Horse wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:46

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:44Nah I think I'll just bust your balls to pieces every month until you correct your mistake.

Fury will be back soon.

Even when he returns to action he doesn't belong in the Top 10 until he earns it again. He's been gone so long it'll be about like starting over for him. I doubt he fights a Top 30 ranked Heavyweight in either of his first few fights back...I'm also skeptical as to whether or not he even fights the fights to begin with.

Anyway. Keep on being wrong, and ranking Fury where he doesn't belong if you wish. I'll keep calling you out on it.

I've done my part today.

The list isn’t actually that bad.

But it’s impossible to take it seriously with Fury inside the top 10.

PredatorHayds wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 13:16 The list isn’t actually that bad.

But it’s impossible to take it seriously with Fury inside the top 10.

If Fury's inside the Top 30 it's impossible to take seriously.

Fury has been out of the ring for a longer period than Mayweather was during his two 'retirements' post Hatton and Berto. Ranking Fury at the moment would be akin to keeping Mayweather ranked until at least October 2019.

dirk2686 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 13:38 Fury has been out of the ring for a longer period than Mayweather was during his two 'retirements' post Hatton and Berto. Ranking Fury at the moment would be akin to keeping Mayweather ranked until at least October 2019.

Mayweather fought last year. So a retired fighter is more active than Fury.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 13:39So a retired fighter is more active than Fury.

That's a pretty meaningless point to make.

A fighter can announce their retirement a few minutes after their last fight and be the least inactive boxer in the world.

BJS above AJ wind it in you pecker

Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 15:41 BJS above AJ wind it in you pecker

Now come on...surely everybody can see how the 4th or 5th best Middleweight is better than the #1 Heavyweight.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 15:44

Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 15:41 BJS above AJ wind it in you pecker

Now come on...surely everybody can see how the 4th or 5th best Middleweight is better than the #1 Heavyweight.

Horse is such a character

Never got Gilgamesh's passionate hatered of Fury. He seems to feel more strongly about him that nearly any of the Fury fans.

[*]

gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Jan 2018, 12:10 Horse your rankings are an absolute joke man. Tyson Fury hasn't fought in almost 3 f*cking years. What the hell is wrong with you?

Is he your Brother in Law or something? Did he loan you money?

I always thought Horse is related to a few boxers.