Re: Errol Spence Jr - in the same situation that GGG was before he got the big fights but with the TIME on his side!
Posted: 25 Feb 2018, 22:06
Are you seriously asking me to prove the existence of something that I claim does not exist? It's like asking me to prove that Santa Claus, fairies, ghosts, reincarnation and the afterlife don't exist!
Nobody from Team Spence Jr. has ever initiated contract negotiations and submitted an offer to the likes of Crawford, Thurman, Porter or Garcia for a potential fight. It hasn't happened.
You've made a claim about the likes of Crawford, Thurman, Porter and Garcia "refusing to negotiate" a potential bout with Team Spence Jr., but there is no evidence to support this stance, because it simply didn't happen.
The onus is on you to provide reliable and irrefutable evidence, corroborated by both sides, proving that Team Spence Jr. tried to make a fight with one of his big name rivals, by proposing an offer that was subsequently rejected. You won't be able to do this though, because it didn't happen... ever!
No disrespect, but social media call outs and “trash talking” during interviews is commonplace in our beloved sport. In fact there's actually a legal term for the phrase “trash talking”, since it is commonly referred to by lawyers as “rhetorical hyperbole”, because opinions are not actionable.
It allows fighters to be needlessly derogatory towards their rivals, without fear of being sued for slander or libel, since their target audience are supposed to appreciate that any untruths that may have been uttered was purely intended to be used as a means of self-promotion, rather than being an assertion of facts articulated with actual malice.
So you need to do better than to quote Spence Jr. claiming that “no one wants to fight” him, because it's probably nonsense, especially considering the fact that his team have never even tried to initiate contract negotiations with his biggest rivals.
By the way, if I'm as much of an "idiot" as you claim me to be, it should only require a trivial amount of effort on your part to prove me wrong in regards to this matter, so let's see what you are really capable of?
Are you going to allow an "idiot" to get one up on you?
For the record, I've never received a permanent ban and you are clearly one of many people that become deeply offended whenever someone undermines their ill-considered theories using cold hard facts that accurately portray reality.Badhusker wrote: ↑25 Feb 2018, 20:19By the way, what you think is insulting, is only honest feelings based on facts from not only me, but many others that frequent this site. You are careful enough to not get banned again like you have before is the only difference. The mods have either loosened their criteria for banning, or maybe just tired of banning you.
Is it the role of the moderator to ban people that possess an opinion that does not concur with yours, especially an educated one, such as mine, that was researched thoroughly and can nearly always be substantiated with evidence supplied by multiple reliable sources?
Do you honestly believe that independently-minded individuals, those that actually make the effort to research what has transpired in the real-world and then formulating their own opinion based purely on evidence rather than idle gossip, as being “trolls” and "idiots"?
Am I supposed to adhere to the common Lemming-like derogatory misconceptions, which usually bear no relation to reality, held by the majority of merely casual and lazy fight fans that only possess a passing interest in our beloved sport? Is that the sort of conduct you deem as being “appropriate”?
