Page 2 of 2
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 28 May 2018, 11:54
by Boxing Prospect
ElJefe wrote: ↑23 Apr 2018, 07:20
I'd like to see a ruling whereby in order to gain a world ranking/fight for a world title, you have to have won your national title or the European title first.
Japan has a rule very similar to that, where by a fighter must have won either the Japanese, OPBF or WBO Asia Pacific title before getting a world fight in Japan
They make an exception ONLY for exceptional amateurs (think the rule was bronze or higher at Olympics or World Championships), with Murata wing the only fighter to qualify under that exception so far
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 28 May 2018, 13:42
by Ruthless-RKO
Boxers can likely get a ranking quicker by winning the 'continental' type belts or WBO European/IBF Euro belts etc.
I think it's harder to win a domestic title. You're not fighting pushovers. You're fighting the donestically tough guys.
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 02 Jun 2018, 14:01
by brilo33
i think the eurpean title is very much still relevant,look at the Bradley Skeete fight last month, obviously some division are stronger then other s
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 02 Jun 2018, 14:03
by brilo33
i was getting above my station saying British boxing was on a higher level then European level
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 04 Jun 2018, 10:31
by ILikeBeer
It's boxing. Titles generally are less relevant these days.
As said, as there are squillions of different trinkets in each division. Why do things the hard way, when you can beat Joe Schmo for the WBC Diamond Studded Super-Mega Platinum Belt. Gets you a ranking, if nothing else.
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 04 Jun 2018, 11:23
by Goz
A great shame really. I remember some great European fight nights, electric atmosphere as some hardened, technical grizzly Italian/Frenchman/Bulgarian came over to contest one of our lads for the right to call themselves champion of their continent.
Pretty sure all of our Middleweights in the early 80s (Sibbo etc) went through the European title.
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 09 Jun 2018, 09:34
by dubliner
Did britain not vote to leave europe, just saying

Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 09 Jun 2018, 10:08
by brilo33
dubliner wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 09:34
Did britain not vote to leave europe, just saying
Yeah we did. We won it in the ring .but the cards are telling a different story
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 09 Jun 2018, 10:15
by dubliner
brilo33 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 10:08
dubliner wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 09:34
Did britain not vote to leave europe, just saying
Yeah we did. We won it in the ring .but the cards are telling a different story
Won the battle the wars a diffrent story

Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 09 Jun 2018, 10:18
by brilo33
dubliner wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 10:15
brilo33 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 10:08
dubliner wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 09:34
Did britain not vote to leave europe, just saying
Yeah we did. We won it in the ring .but the cards are telling a different story
Won the battle the wars a diffrent story
Could be a gatti v ward
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 09 Jun 2018, 10:42
by dubliner
brilo33 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 10:18
dubliner wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 10:15
brilo33 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 10:08
Yeah we did. We won it in the ring .but the cards are telling a different story
Won the battle the wars a diffrent story
Could be a gatti v ward
Most certainly will be, get the pop corn out
Re: Is the European Title still relevant?
Posted: 09 Jun 2018, 12:46
by funso banjo baby
I remember Bruno describing his euro win over Eklund making him 'champion of half the world'.
this was pre the end of soviet Russia of course.
times have certainly changed.....the euro title is peanuts now.