Re: Lennox Lewis vs Anthony Joshua
Posted: 03 May 2018, 15:35
Lewis may possess better skills but I would hardly say he is the better athlete. What gives you that impression if I may ask?
Yes, Joshua was fighting in spurts, open your eyes and see it. And all those your wet dreams about him outboxing Klitschko for most of the rounds - we have already seen them, I find no need in repeating about that.Kalan wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 15:29 It's only amusing if you have no idea what you're looking at... ??? Fighting recklessly???![]()
![]()
One way to beat Klitschko??? ... How about out-boxing and outscoring Klitschko for most of the rounds... How about knocking Klitschko down 3 times and stopping him... How about being well ahead at the finish so he could have won on points or by knockout... How about out-thinking Klitschko in the mid-rounds and escaping danger???
AJ didn't come to a gunfight with a switchblade... And he didn't get cannonaded like Lewis did... TWICE!!!
i didn't see someone being "out-boxed"Kalan wrote: ↑02 May 2018, 18:17Did Klitschko show superb skills or not??? .... Who was winning on the cards going into the 11th??? ... The 11th was shaping up to being a 3-point round for Joshua, with 2 knockdowns -- making him way up on 2 cards and winning on all 3.
What's your description of the fight?
i think lewis was mentally very strong. i couldCojimar 1946 wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 15:38 Also, I'm curious how Joshua compares skillwise and in terms of attributes with Lewis's opponents. Are there any opponents that stick out for people?
Klitschko might be the closest thing to Lewis that Joshua has fought.
Joshua was a lot more active than Lewis versus Mavrovic... And punching a lot better... You're having wet dreams lad, and they're fogging your brain... Joshua won most of the rounds... He outscored Klitschko early and late unless you're blind.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 16:00Yes, Joshua was fighting in spurts, open your eyes and see it. And all those your wet dreams about him outboxing Klitschko for most of the rounds - we have already seen them, I find no need in repeating about that.Kalan wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 15:29 It's only amusing if you have no idea what you're looking at... ??? Fighting recklessly???![]()
![]()
One way to beat Klitschko??? ... How about out-boxing and outscoring Klitschko for most of the rounds... How about knocking Klitschko down 3 times and stopping him... How about being well ahead at the finish so he could have won on points or by knockout... How about out-thinking Klitschko in the mid-rounds and escaping danger???
AJ didn't come to a gunfight with a switchblade... And he didn't get cannonaded like Lewis did... TWICE!!!
In terms of a right hand counterpuncher... Joshua fires off his right counter the way Oliver McCall did in the 1st Lewis fight... Ollie got Lewis with a nice right in the 1st round, but it was a little high... A few seconds in the 2nd he caught Lewis nicely.Cojimar 1946 wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 15:38 Also, I'm curious how Joshua compares skillwise and in terms of attributes with Lewis's opponents. Are there any opponents that stick out for people?
Klitschko might be the closest thing to Lewis that Joshua has fought.
You're just an AJ fanboy. Fanatics have no reason.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 01:19Joshua was a lot more active than Lewis versus Mavrovic... And punching a lot better... You're having wet dreams lad, and they're fogging your brain... Joshua won most of the rounds... He outscored Klitschko early and late unless you're blind.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 16:00Yes, Joshua was fighting in spurts, open your eyes and see it. And all those your wet dreams about him outboxing Klitschko for most of the rounds - we have already seen them, I find no need in repeating about that.Kalan wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 15:29 It's only amusing if you have no idea what you're looking at... ??? Fighting recklessly???![]()
![]()
One way to beat Klitschko??? ... How about out-boxing and outscoring Klitschko for most of the rounds... How about knocking Klitschko down 3 times and stopping him... How about being well ahead at the finish so he could have won on points or by knockout... How about out-thinking Klitschko in the mid-rounds and escaping danger???
AJ didn't come to a gunfight with a switchblade... And he didn't get cannonaded like Lewis did... TWICE!!!
...seriously...a bromance in the making.DrDuke wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 09:05You're just an AJ fanboy. Fanatics have no reason.
I make an honest comparison. If Klitschko won I would give the reasons why he did. You're a hater so it's impossible for you to assess honestly. If you can't find a smoking gun you fashion one out of bar soap.DrDuke wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 09:05You're just an AJ fanboy. Fanatics have no reason.
I'm not a hater, I've never said, that Joshua sucked. I'm actually saying, that he has the potential, he is developing and being a top guy today, but he has been given some dividends in advance.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 10:02I make an honest comparison. If Klitschko won I would give the reasons why he did. You're a hater so it's impossible for you to assess honestly. If you can't find a smoking gun you fashion one out of bar soap.
All anyone has to do is watch the ATG Joshua-Klitschko classic to realize who was scoring with the most damaging punches and combinations for most of the 11 rounds that fight lasted -- before the referee was forced to step in and save Wladimir's life... All you have to is watch Lewis-Rahman 1 to see a jive artist eat a loaded right hander driving straight down the pipe... Joshua was caught with one of the slickest right hands anyone ever threw and no good follow ups.
It's ridiculous that you can't make an honest comparison between an undefeated modern boxer vs past ATGs who got pasted, blasted and hammered by little guys (like Muhammad Ali did) exposing holes in their defenses without somebody using the bromance BS... There's seriously contorted and deluded brain functioning going on to create scenarios where little tiny dudes who got hit all the time beat bigger, stronger, faster, better athletes who can box better.
Past ATGs showed the remarkable stuff. Some of the modern boxers for the moment aren't fully tested, so the comparison is pretty obvious: you can either go with past ATGs pointing on their achievements or go with modern stars counting on what they can become. Both ways are opinions, both ways have reason behind them.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 10:27It's ridiculous that you can't make an honest comparison between an undefeated modern boxer vs past ATGs who got pasted, blasted and hammered by little guys (like Muhammad Ali did) exposing holes in their defenses without somebody using the bromance BS... There's seriously contorted and deluded brain functioning going on to create scenarios where little tiny dudes who got hit all the time beat bigger, stronger, faster, better athletes who can box better.
Lewis never fought any opponent with the combination of height, size, strength, speed, boxing skills, and cleverness you saw in the ring with Joshua-Klitschko on either side... The closest LL came to fighting a superb boxer-puncher who had a great trainer in his corner was the 1st Oliver McCall fight where he got ripped out in 4 minutes.
I have to be honest. When you asked me to review the vids you posted, I have to agree.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:13 Put it this way.... After 2 or 3 weeks of working with McCall, Steward told McCall he was quick and versatile enough to beat anybody... He predicted McCall would beat Lewis and confuse the Hell out of him... "Lewis is easily confused."
I'll take the word of an ATG coach about McCall's potential over your's... Was McCall a head case??? ... Of course he was.
Thanks for that Oogie.
AJ getting knocked down may have shown vulnerability but having it happen at the hands of an old but still dangerous howitzer from Wlad, doesn't validate any questions, other than, he was fine by the time his butt hit the canvas. I.E. Doesn't prove glass nor granite. IF a gun to my head...he took a great shot and came back to win, much like Wilder.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:31Thanks for that Oogie.
Now for Duke... Frazier, Norton, Foreman, and Ali showed a remarkable ability to get punched in the face -- and they never faced anyone like Joshua or Klitschko in their lives... So that would be absolute devastation for them.
Joe Louis got knocked down 12 times... That's no record or anything -- but Joshua is supposed to be exposed to the whole wide world when he suffered a knockdown by one of the greatest punchers in the History of Boxing... When Louis suffered his 1st knockdown by Max Schmeling he didn't work his way out of the hole... Joshua did.
Larry Holmes was by far the greatest boxer to come out of that era.... Reynaldo Snipes almost cooled him.![]()
Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali never had such opponents as Joshua or Klitschko, cause there had been different times. Those four had been too advanced for their opposition, they had demonstrated a breakthrough in boxing skills. However, the opposition of Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali had been tough more in the sense of fighting, than boxing in its modern definition. But such significant advancing over the others in their era made Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali able to be compared with later era competitors. And Holmes was in the similar situation, even more - he was the only elite level guy in his times. Yes, he had some tough fights, but so what? Everyone had such.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:31 Now for Duke... Frazier, Norton, Foreman, and Ali showed a remarkable ability to get punched in the face -- and they never faced anyone like Joshua or Klitschko in their lives... So that would be absolute devastation for them.
Joe Louis got knocked down 12 times... That's no record or anything -- but Joshua is supposed to be exposed to the whole wide world when he suffered a knockdown by one of the greatest punchers in the History of Boxing... When Louis suffered his 1st knockdown by Max Schmeling he didn't work his way out of the hole... Joshua did.
Larry Holmes was by far the greatest boxer to come out of that era.... Reynaldo Snipes almost cooled him.![]()
Good points Duke, but I have to defend Holmes. His skillset was so broad and deep, he could've competed on any level in any era IMHO. Size aside.DrDuke wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:46Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali never had such opponents as Joshua or Klitschko, cause there had been different times. Those four had been too advanced for their opposition, they had demonstrated a breakthrough in boxing skills. However, the opposition of Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali had been tough more in the sense of fighting, than boxing in its modern definition. But such significant advancing over the others in their era made Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali able to be compared with later era competitors. And Holmes was in the similar situation, even more - he was the only elite level guy in his times. Yes, he had some tough fights, but so what? Everyone had such.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:31 Now for Duke... Frazier, Norton, Foreman, and Ali showed a remarkable ability to get punched in the face -- and they never faced anyone like Joshua or Klitschko in their lives... So that would be absolute devastation for them.
Joe Louis got knocked down 12 times... That's no record or anything -- but Joshua is supposed to be exposed to the whole wide world when he suffered a knockdown by one of the greatest punchers in the History of Boxing... When Louis suffered his 1st knockdown by Max Schmeling he didn't work his way out of the hole... Joshua did.
Larry Holmes was by far the greatest boxer to come out of that era.... Reynaldo Snipes almost cooled him.![]()
I agree, I also consider Holmes enough classy to be able to compete in any time.oogiebe wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:48Good points Duke, but I have to defend Holmes. His skillset was so broad and deep, he could've competed on any level in any era IMHO. Size aside.DrDuke wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:46Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali never had such opponents as Joshua or Klitschko, cause there had been different times. Those four had been too advanced for their opposition, they had demonstrated a breakthrough in boxing skills. However, the opposition of Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali had been tough more in the sense of fighting, than boxing in its modern definition. But such significant advancing over the others in their era made Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali able to be compared with later era competitors. And Holmes was in the similar situation, even more - he was the only elite level guy in his times. Yes, he had some tough fights, but so what? Everyone had such.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:31 Now for Duke... Frazier, Norton, Foreman, and Ali showed a remarkable ability to get punched in the face -- and they never faced anyone like Joshua or Klitschko in their lives... So that would be absolute devastation for them.
Joe Louis got knocked down 12 times... That's no record or anything -- but Joshua is supposed to be exposed to the whole wide world when he suffered a knockdown by one of the greatest punchers in the History of Boxing... When Louis suffered his 1st knockdown by Max Schmeling he didn't work his way out of the hole... Joshua did.
Larry Holmes was by far the greatest boxer to come out of that era.... Reynaldo Snipes almost cooled him.![]()
The times were different because a huge slice of the planet that is producing great Heavyweights didn't have professional Boxing at that time... Since that day the UK has trebled their investment in Boxing and threatening to dominate the sport... Eastern European nations are producing fabulous numbers of Cruiserweights and some Heavyweights.DrDuke wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 13:46 Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali never had such opponents as Joshua or Klitschko, cause there had been different times. Those four had been too advanced for their opposition, they had demonstrated a breakthrough in boxing skills. However, the opposition of Frazier, Norton, Foreman and Ali had been tough more in the sense of fighting, than boxing in its modern definition.
That's strange. It's possible to agree about Foreman though, his main advantages were size and special power.
And? Every top boxer's scalps are mostly journeymen, who are aimed to help higher class fighters to build records.
There is nothing breakthrough about leading with your head like Norton and Frazier.... That made them easy marks for Foreman... Leaning straight back from punches, like Ali did, isn't a breakthrough... It's a very common flaw and gets you hit with left hooks and blooping shots... Ali's jab delivery was also badly flawed because he left his face wide open.. Walking in while loading left hooks like Frazier did isn't a breakthrough... Right hands can get there faster can take your head off.
Good points, but I believe the old-timers fought more then today's HW's so it's more of a mix. Like in-between paydays. PS: That's quite an all-star list of not so goods!!! Love it. Looks bad when you see it all together.Kalan wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 15:02There is nothing breakthrough about leading with your head like Norton and Frazier.... That made them easy marks for Foreman... Leaning straight back from punches, like Ali did, isn't a breakthrough... It's a very common flaw and gets you hit with left hooks and blooping shots... Ali's jab delivery was also badly flawed because he left his face wide open.. Walking in while loading left hooks like Frazier did isn't a breakthrough... Right hands can get there faster can take your head off.
You're never going to see Anthony Joshua pad his challenger list with guys like: Jean Pierre Coopman, Brian London, Chuck Wepner, Alfredo Evangelista, Richard Dunn, Terry Daniels, Manuel Ramos, Ron Stander, Dave Zyglewitz, Joe Roman, Crawford Grimsley, and other characters who shouldn't even be main event fighters.