Page 2 of 5

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 23 May 2018, 17:05
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 23 May 2018, 16:11
oogiebe wrote: 23 May 2018, 15:53
SenorPipino wrote: 23 May 2018, 15:52 Can't see any profit in it for Miller to take on a still raw guy like Joyce.

Joyce isn't a name yet. Has just a few fights. Four. Still an amateur.

What's in it for a top 10 fighter like Big Baby to challenge Joyce?

Hearn was talking about Miller-Joshua this summer. It's unlikely to happen.

It's quite a step down for Miller to change his sights and engage in a semi-high risk/absolutely no reward matchup with Joyce.
All that doesn't change my mind. I'd still like to see it. Miller's a puss anyway.
Aren't all Big Baby's?
Senor strikes again! LMAO!!!! Yup...I guess so! :TU: :clap:

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 24 May 2018, 00:26
by KiwiRider
SenorPipino wrote: 23 May 2018, 15:52 Can't see any profit in it for Miller to take on a still raw guy like Joyce.

Joyce isn't a name yet. Has just a few fights. Four. Still an amateur.

What's in it for a top 10 fighter like Big Baby to challenge Joyce?

Hearn was talking about Miller-Joshua this summer. It's unlikely to happen.

It's quite a step down for Miller to change his sights and engage in a semi-high risk/absolutely no reward matchup with Joyce.
Both Miller and Joyce look raw to me.
As for what's in it for Miller? Staying busy and earning $$$ mostly. He has slowly been getting in better shape, fight by fight. If he sits at the buffet waiting around for AJ, it isn't going to do him any good.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 24 May 2018, 04:30
by joshj909
KiwiRider wrote: 24 May 2018, 00:26
SenorPipino wrote: 23 May 2018, 15:52 Can't see any profit in it for Miller to take on a still raw guy like Joyce.

Joyce isn't a name yet. Has just a few fights. Four. Still an amateur.

What's in it for a top 10 fighter like Big Baby to challenge Joyce?

Hearn was talking about Miller-Joshua this summer. It's unlikely to happen.

It's quite a step down for Miller to change his sights and engage in a semi-high risk/absolutely no reward matchup with Joyce.
Both Miller and Joyce look raw to me.
As for what's in it for Miller? Staying busy and earning $$$ mostly. He has slowly been getting in better shape, fight by fight. If he sits at the buffet waiting around for AJ, it isn't going to do him any good.
I still think that a win over 4-0 Joyce is better than any of Miller's other wins. He could also make the same "I beat the division's boogeyman" claim that most boxers make when they don't deserve a shot.

Haye was willing to offer over £80k for Chisora, does anyone know the ballpark of what Miller has previously earned? i imagine it would be a bit more, but probably less than Haye earned per round in his last fight...

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 24 May 2018, 08:07
by Lackeos
sweetviolenturge wrote: 22 May 2018, 12:28 Actually, I think "Kingpin" Johnson would be an OK opponent for him now even though he's badly faded & just got stopped. Then I'd bring in a Dawejko or another type of step-up opponent.
Yeah, that sort of matchmaking would be appropriately steadily paced and would be sufficient to prove that he deserves a top 50 ranking. There's lots of other undefeated fighters in boxrec's top 50 who haven't beaten anyone as good as Dawejko, such as Cieslak, Dinu, Trevor Bryan, Teslenko, Negron, Hrgovic, Fujimoto, Zhang, Rivas, Kean, Schwarz, etc. I'd say that, on paper at least, he would easily be in the top 35 if he won those winnable fights.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 24 May 2018, 11:06
by joshj909
Apparantly Miller is asking for $4M, so i guess that's off the cards.

I have only just realised that there are Commonwealth "rankings" so i guess we can unsafely assume his defence will be one of these (i have taken out a couple that definitely wont take it):
Dave Allen
Derek Chisora
Gary Cornish
Junior Fa
Nathan Gorman
Joseph Parker
Sam Sexton
Carlos Takam
Nick Webb

That's a mixture of decent competition and a drop in competition...

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 24 May 2018, 13:24
by African Monkey
joshj909 wrote: 24 May 2018, 11:06 Apparantly Miller is asking for $4M, so i guess that's off the cards.

I have only just realised that there are Commonwealth "rankings" so i guess we can unsafely assume his defence will be one of these (i have taken out a couple that definitely wont take it):
Dave Allen
Derek Chisora
Gary Cornish
Junior Fa
Nathan Gorman
Joseph Parker
Sam Sexton
Carlos Takam
Nick Webb

That's a mixture of decent competition and a drop in competition...
So either Gary Cornish or Nick Webb then....

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 24 May 2018, 14:58
by joshj909
African Monkey wrote: 24 May 2018, 13:24
joshj909 wrote: 24 May 2018, 11:06 Apparantly Miller is asking for $4M, so i guess that's off the cards.

I have only just realised that there are Commonwealth "rankings" so i guess we can unsafely assume his defence will be one of these (i have taken out a couple that definitely wont take it):
Dave Allen
Derek Chisora
Gary Cornish
Junior Fa
Nathan Gorman
Joseph Parker
Sam Sexton
Carlos Takam
Nick Webb

That's a mixture of decent competition and a drop in competition...
So either Gary Cornish or Nick Webb then....
Unfortunately, most likely..

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 24 May 2018, 18:20
by KiwiRider
joshj909 wrote: 24 May 2018, 14:58
African Monkey wrote: 24 May 2018, 13:24
joshj909 wrote: 24 May 2018, 11:06 Apparantly Miller is asking for $4M, so i guess that's off the cards.

I have only just realised that there are Commonwealth "rankings" so i guess we can unsafely assume his defence will be one of these (i have taken out a couple that definitely wont take it):
Dave Allen
Derek Chisora
Gary Cornish
Junior Fa
Nathan Gorman
Joseph Parker
Sam Sexton
Carlos Takam
Nick Webb

That's a mixture of decent competition and a drop in competition...
So either Gary Cornish or Nick Webb then....
Unfortunately, most likely..
So you don't think Dave Allen would take it? I know his cut was bad last time out.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 04:16
by African Monkey
KiwiRider wrote: 24 May 2018, 18:20
joshj909 wrote: 24 May 2018, 14:58
African Monkey wrote: 24 May 2018, 13:24
So either Gary Cornish or Nick Webb then....
Unfortunately, most likely..
So you don't think Dave Allen would take it? I know his cut was bad last time out.
Well he's out of shape, just had a fight and has said he won't go into fights as an opponent anymore so it would be a shock if he took this fight on such short notice.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 04:29
by joshj909
African Monkey wrote: 25 May 2018, 04:16
KiwiRider wrote: 24 May 2018, 18:20
joshj909 wrote: 24 May 2018, 14:58

Unfortunately, most likely..
So you don't think Dave Allen would take it? I know his cut was bad last time out.
Well he's out of shape, just had a fight and has said he won't go into fights as an opponent anymore so it would be a shock if he took this fight on such short notice.
He's fairly open about his situation on twitter. He has mentioned that he is trying to get a fight with Lucas Browne going. Also...

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 05:49
by candyslim
Lackeos wrote: 21 May 2018, 07:55 Yeah, it was insane how Leon Spinks was fighting better opponents at age 23 than Joe Joyce is fighting at age 32. You could say it's amazing that a 32-year-old has already progressed to fighting opponents as good as Lenroy Thomas. That is way better than someone like Artur Szpilka, Andy Ruiz Jr, or Tom Schwarz; who were fighting opponents of that caliber when they were 23. Or Hughie Fury, beating Rudenko when he was 20. Or Agit Kabayel, beating way better opposition at age 25. So yeah, you could say Joe Joyce is a rare breed. If Joyce has already progressed this far by age 32, imagine how good he'll be when he's 50!

Be fair he's just turned pro after an extensive amateur career. He won the commonwealth title in his fourth fight having tried to land Chisora. Now he's gunning for Miller.

I don't know if you were trying to be funny because you are normally a good poster with a history of sensible contributions, but if you weren't then I'd suggest saving your criticism for those who deserve it, such as Trevor Bryan, LaRon Mitchell, Michael Wallisch, Bogdan Dinu or even Andy Ruiz Jnr. for example.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 06:10
by jamamb
its just about age and boxrec points for lackeos. the clown mexicool calls everyone he disagrees with a boxrec warrior , but its truly fitting for the lacky, whose hissy fit temper tantrum over the suggestion of scwarz vs dimitrenko is one of the strangest reactions ive seen here

on another thread he was doing a whole 'when loma was berchelts age he couldnt even beat salido', as if it made berchelt superior, and was basically suggesting too that berchelt can expect the big improvement we saw with loma after that point

of course not caring to mention that berchelt was a 30+ fight , almost 10 year pro at 26 whereas loma had like 1 fight and 3 rounds pro. lacky seems to think improvement is purely about age and not experience

as for joyce, he hasnt moved at a loma pace but hes done pretty well for 4 fights.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 07:38
by candyslim
I think so. He's a good fighter but a Lomachenko he ain't.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 07:40
by Lackeos
jamamb wrote: 25 May 2018, 06:10 its just about age and boxrec points for lackeos. the clown mexicool calls everyone he disagrees with a boxrec warrior , but its truly fitting for the lacky, whose hissy fit temper tantrum over the suggestion of scwarz vs dimitrenko is one of the strangest reactions ive seen here
More like you're a dumbass who doesn't know how to manage prospects, and rather than accept that fact, you'd prefer to follow and harass someone else from thread to thread to thread, rather than drop a months-old topic that you were wrong about.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 08:15
by Lackeos
candyslim wrote: 25 May 2018, 05:49
Lackeos wrote: 21 May 2018, 07:55 Yeah, it was insane how Leon Spinks was fighting better opponents at age 23 than Joe Joyce is fighting at age 32. You could say it's amazing that a 32-year-old has already progressed to fighting opponents as good as Lenroy Thomas. That is way better than someone like Artur Szpilka, Andy Ruiz Jr, or Tom Schwarz; who were fighting opponents of that caliber when they were 23. Or Hughie Fury, beating Rudenko when he was 20. Or Agit Kabayel, beating way better opposition at age 25. So yeah, you could say Joe Joyce is a rare breed. If Joyce has already progressed this far by age 32, imagine how good he'll be when he's 50!

Be fair he's just turned pro after an extensive amateur career. He won the commonwealth title in his fourth fight having tried to land Chisora. Now he's gunning for Miller.

I don't know if you were trying to be funny because you are normally a good poster with a history of sensible contributions, but if you weren't then I'd suggest saving your criticism for those who deserve it, such as Trevor Bryan, LaRon Mitchell, Michael Wallisch, Bogdan Dinu or even Andy Ruiz Jnr. for example.
You could call this criticism, but if you look at it in-context, you'll see what I'm trying to say. The original poster is claiming that Joe Joyce's progress is fast-tracked in a way that is comparable to Leon Spinks. I don't believe that this is even a remotely accurate comparison. After Joyce won a European bronze medal, he stayed in the amateurs and kept winning medals for 3 more years, then competed in a dozen all-but-entirely-professional boxing matches, and now after 4 additional pro matches, is still not fighting opponents as good as Spinks's fourth opponent -- Pedro Agosto. Spinks was being fast-tracked at age 23, Joyce's career progress by age 32 is not fast. Joyce is 32, and he's still playing in the kiddie pool (in terms of professional matchmaking), just as he was the old guy playing in the kiddie pool when he was an amateur. The fighters I listed are almost a decade younger and are fighting in the deep end of the professional pool. In this particular case, I'm not criticizing Joyce, I'm criticizing the idea that he's the most fast-tracked heavyweight in several decades.

However, I've seen this kind of hype before, with David Price. Price won an Olympic bronze medal, but he did so at a relatively advanced age. A lot of people were hyping him to be the next conqueror of the heavyweight division, and claimed that Tyson Fury would be forever afraid to fight him, and never able to beat him. I always argued that by the time Fury reached his prime, he would far surpass Price, which these people did not accept. Amateur accomplishments are increasingly less meaningful at the later age that you earn them, and should not be treated as equally important indicators of potential without regard to age. Price was only 25 (still old to be competing in the amateurs), Joyce was much older when he earned silver. I believe that Joyce's hype will ultimately prove to be unjustified in the same way that Price's hype was, because they are both largely based on the false premise that amateur accomplishment is a predictor of professional success, regardless of how much age and experience advantage the competitor held over his opponents.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 11:05
by HeavyHitters
sweetviolenturge wrote: 21 May 2018, 03:07 I'm finding the way in which the "Juggernaught'" is going about his career very, very interesting. I don't recall a heavyweight being fast-tracked in this manner since Leon Spinks & even Leon started out fighting club fighters in six round bouts at the beginning of his career. He didn't fight his first ten round main event until he met Scott Ledoux in his sixth pro fight while Joyce fought a ten rounder right away in his pro debut. And having won the Commonwealth title in just his fourth pro contest Joyce fought a scheduled 12 rounder sooner than any other heavyweight that I can recall.
I wonder who's next? Hopefully, his people will be able to convince Dereck Chisora to take the fight. That will be an excellent barometer for Joyce. If he struggles ( or loses, of course ) then they know that it'll be time to slow things down & allow him to learn with a few more fights before stepping him up again. But, if he should KO Chisora then a top ten contender should follow within another fight or two.
If Chisora elects to not take the fight then Joyce's people should bring in someone like a Christian Hammer. A decent, experienced heavyweight who took Tyson deep & went 12 full rounds with Povetkin. A victory over him would be equitable to a win over Chisora.
You don't remember a guy named Mike Tyson??

:OhYes: :OhYes: :witzend: :OhYes: :OhYes:

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 11:07
by oogiebe
HeavyHitters wrote: 25 May 2018, 11:05
sweetviolenturge wrote: 21 May 2018, 03:07 I'm finding the way in which the "Juggernaught'" is going about his career very, very interesting. I don't recall a heavyweight being fast-tracked in this manner since Leon Spinks & even Leon started out fighting club fighters in six round bouts at the beginning of his career. He didn't fight his first ten round main event until he met Scott Ledoux in his sixth pro fight while Joyce fought a ten rounder right away in his pro debut. And having won the Commonwealth title in just his fourth pro contest Joyce fought a scheduled 12 rounder sooner than any other heavyweight that I can recall.
I wonder who's next? Hopefully, his people will be able to convince Dereck Chisora to take the fight. That will be an excellent barometer for Joyce. If he struggles ( or loses, of course ) then they know that it'll be time to slow things down & allow him to learn with a few more fights before stepping him up again. But, if he should KO Chisora then a top ten contender should follow within another fight or two.
If Chisora elects to not take the fight then Joyce's people should bring in someone like a Christian Hammer. A decent, experienced heavyweight who took Tyson deep & went 12 full rounds with Povetkin. A victory over him would be equitable to a win over Chisora.
You don't remember a guy named Mike Tyson??

:OhYes: :OhYes: :witzend: :OhYes: :OhYes:
:TU: (among others)

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 14:20
by tiny_acres
oogiebe wrote: 25 May 2018, 11:07
HeavyHitters wrote: 25 May 2018, 11:05
sweetviolenturge wrote: 21 May 2018, 03:07 I'm finding the way in which the "Juggernaught'" is going about his career very, very interesting. I don't recall a heavyweight being fast-tracked in this manner since Leon Spinks & even Leon started out fighting club fighters in six round bouts at the beginning of his career. He didn't fight his first ten round main event until he met Scott Ledoux in his sixth pro fight while Joyce fought a ten rounder right away in his pro debut. And having won the Commonwealth title in just his fourth pro contest Joyce fought a scheduled 12 rounder sooner than any other heavyweight that I can recall.
I wonder who's next? Hopefully, his people will be able to convince Dereck Chisora to take the fight. That will be an excellent barometer for Joyce. If he struggles ( or loses, of course ) then they know that it'll be time to slow things down & allow him to learn with a few more fights before stepping him up again. But, if he should KO Chisora then a top ten contender should follow within another fight or two.
If Chisora elects to not take the fight then Joyce's people should bring in someone like a Christian Hammer. A decent, experienced heavyweight who took Tyson deep & went 12 full rounds with Povetkin. A victory over him would be equitable to a win over Chisora.
You don't remember a guy named Mike Tyson??

:OhYes: :OhYes: :witzend: :OhYes: :OhYes:
:TU: (among others)
Joe Joyce's first 4 fights are miles and miles better than Tyson's first 4 opponents.
It's not even debatable

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 14:28
by oogiebe
tiny_acres wrote: 25 May 2018, 14:20
oogiebe wrote: 25 May 2018, 11:07
HeavyHitters wrote: 25 May 2018, 11:05

You don't remember a guy named Mike Tyson??

:OhYes: :OhYes: :witzend: :OhYes: :OhYes:
:TU: (among others)
Joe Joyce's first 4 fights are miles and miles better than Tyson's first 4 opponents.
It's not even debatable
For me it's like Tyson was. Fighting anyone every 6 weeks or so. I'd like to see Joyce pick up the pace.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 15:10
by sweetviolenturge
Lackeos wrote: 25 May 2018, 08:15
candyslim wrote: 25 May 2018, 05:49
Lackeos wrote: 21 May 2018, 07:55 Yeah, it was insane how Leon Spinks was fighting better opponents at age 23 than Joe Joyce is fighting at age 32. You could say it's amazing that a 32-year-old has already progressed to fighting opponents as good as Lenroy Thomas. That is way better than someone like Artur Szpilka, Andy Ruiz Jr, or Tom Schwarz; who were fighting opponents of that caliber when they were 23. Or Hughie Fury, beating Rudenko when he was 20. Or Agit Kabayel, beating way better opposition at age 25. So yeah, you could say Joe Joyce is a rare breed. If Joyce has already progressed this far by age 32, imagine how good he'll be when he's 50!

Be fair he's just turned pro after an extensive amateur career. He won the commonwealth title in his fourth fight having tried to land Chisora. Now he's gunning for Miller.

I don't know if you were trying to be funny because you are normally a good poster with a history of sensible contributions, but if you weren't then I'd suggest saving your criticism for those who deserve it, such as Trevor Bryan, LaRon Mitchell, Michael Wallisch, Bogdan Dinu or even Andy Ruiz Jnr. for example.
You could call this criticism, but if you look at it in-context, you'll see what I'm trying to say. The original poster is claiming that Joe Joyce's progress is fast-tracked in a way that is comparable to Leon Spinks. I don't believe that this is even a remotely accurate comparison. After Joyce won a European bronze medal, he stayed in the amateurs and kept winning medals for 3 more years, then competed in a dozen all-but-entirely-professional boxing matches, and now after 4 additional pro matches, is still not fighting opponents as good as Spinks's fourth opponent -- Pedro Agosto. Spinks was being fast-tracked at age 23, Joyce's career progress by age 32 is not fast. Joyce is 32, and he's still playing in the kiddie pool (in terms of professional matchmaking), just as he was the old guy playing in the kiddie pool when he was an amateur. The fighters I listed are almost a decade younger and are fighting in the deep end of the professional pool. In this particular case, I'm not criticizing Joyce, I'm criticizing the idea that he's the most fast-tracked heavyweight in several decades.

However, I've seen this kind of hype before, with David Price. Price won an Olympic bronze medal, but he did so at a relatively advanced age. A lot of people were hyping him to be the next conqueror of the heavyweight division, and claimed that Tyson Fury would be forever afraid to fight him, and never able to beat him. I always argued that by the time Fury reached his prime, he would far surpass Price, which these people did not accept. Amateur accomplishments are increasingly less meaningful at the later age that you earn them, and should not be treated as equally important indicators of potential without regard to age. Price was only 25 (still old to be competing in the amateurs), Joyce was much older when he earned silver. I believe that Joyce's hype will ultimately prove to be unjustified in the same way that Price's hype was, because they are both largely based on the false premise that amateur accomplishment is a predictor of professional success, regardless of how much age and experience advantage the competitor held over his opponents.
I'd argue that both Joyce's first & his fourth pro opponents Ian Lewison ( 12-3-1 ) & Lenroy Thomas ( 22-4-1 ) were comparable to Spinks's fifth pro opponent Pedro Agosto ( 28-8-1 ).

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 15:16
by tiny_acres
oogiebe wrote: 25 May 2018, 14:28
tiny_acres wrote: 25 May 2018, 14:20
oogiebe wrote: 25 May 2018, 11:07

:TU: (among others)
Joe Joyce's first 4 fights are miles and miles better than Tyson's first 4 opponents.
It's not even debatable
For me it's like Tyson was. Fighting anyone every 6 weeks or so. I'd like to see Joyce pick up the pace.
I agree Tyson was fighting non stop. Joyce needs to either get better opposition or fight every 4-6 weeks.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 25 May 2018, 18:39
by Lackeos
Another thing I'd like to point out, and again, this is not to hate on Joe Joyce, but there are other fighters who have had superior competition through four fights. Some examples I can think of include Luis Ortiz, Kubrat Pulev, Odlanier Solis, and Tyrell Biggs. I feel like anyone who's been around for a bit should be able to remember that Ortiz, Pulev, and Solis all got attention for how fast their early matchmaking was.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 26 May 2018, 03:11
by sweetviolenturge
Lackeos wrote: 25 May 2018, 18:39 Another thing I'd like to point out, and again, this is not to hate on Joe Joyce, but there are other fighters who have had superior competition through four fights. Some examples I can think of include Luis Ortiz, Kubrat Pulev, Odlanier Solis, and Tyrell Biggs. I feel like anyone who's been around for a bit should be able to remember that Ortiz, Pulev, and Solis all got attention for how fast their early matchmaking was.
Actually, you're mistaken, my friend.
Let's start with Tyrell Biggs who began his career in a 6 round bout with Mike Evans ( 3-1-1 ). He followed that with three more 6 round bouts against the trio of Mike Perkins ( 16-7-1 ), Grady Daniels ( 9-19 ) & Eddie Richardson ( 9-1 ).
Kubret Pulev began his career in a 4 rounder vs one, Florian Bench ( 2-3 ), a 4 rounder vs Serdar Uysal ( 9-18-2 ), a 6 vs Gbenga Oluokun ( 17-2 ) & another 6 vs Zack Page ( 19-25-2 ).
Luis Ortiz got his start in a 4 rounder vs Lamar Davis ( 4-1 ), a 6 rounder vs Charles Davis ( 19-19-2 ), stepped up to an 8 vs Kendrick Releford ( 22-13-2 ) & had another 8 vs Zack Page ( 21-30-2 ).
And, lastly, Odlanier Solis began his career in a 4 rounder vs Andreas Sidon ( 32-7 ), a 4 vs Olek Mazikin ( 10-1 ), a 4 vs Aldo Colliander ( 12-1 ) & a 6 vs Marcus McGee ( 19-13 ).

Now contrast those records against Joe Joyce's record who began his career in a scheduled 10 rounder vs Ian Lewison ( 12-3-1 ), an 8 vs Rudolf Jozic ( 4-1 ), an 8 vs Donnie Palmer ( 9-1-1 ) & a 12 round commonwealth title fight vs Lenroy Thomas ( 22-4-1 ).
Although Solis & Ortiz faced opposition that was similar in quality ( or better if one cares to argue the point ) to Joyce's opposition they were both fighting prelim bouts scheduled for 4 & 6 rounds while Joyce has been fighting main event quality bouts of 10 & 12 rounds & winning respected regional titles. So, I'd say that four bouts Joyce has the more advanced career at this point.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 26 May 2018, 03:22
by sweetviolenturge
tiny_acres wrote: 25 May 2018, 15:16
oogiebe wrote: 25 May 2018, 14:28
tiny_acres wrote: 25 May 2018, 14:20

Joe Joyce's first 4 fights are miles and miles better than Tyson's first 4 opponents.
It's not even debatable
For me it's like Tyson was. Fighting anyone every 6 weeks or so. I'd like to see Joyce pick up the pace.
I agree Tyson was fighting non stop. Joyce needs to either get better opposition or fight every 4-6 weeks.
To be fair though, Joyce's people are attempting to go with quality over quantity. Tyson didn't fight his first scheduled 10 round bout until he was 14-0 while Joyce debuted in a 10 rounder. Which was what they had looked to continue but, finding it difficult to find 10 round opponents to keep bust enough with. Joyce had to step down to two 8 rounders to keep busy then, he stepped up to a 12 round commonwealth title fight in his fourth pro fight. A title that he's going to defend in another 12 round bout on June 15.

Re: Joe Joyce's career path

Posted: 26 May 2018, 13:20
by oogiebe
sweetviolenturge wrote: 26 May 2018, 03:22
tiny_acres wrote: 25 May 2018, 15:16
oogiebe wrote: 25 May 2018, 14:28

For me it's like Tyson was. Fighting anyone every 6 weeks or so. I'd like to see Joyce pick up the pace.
I agree Tyson was fighting non stop. Joyce needs to either get better opposition or fight every 4-6 weeks.
To be fair though, Joyce's people are attempting to go with quality over quantity. Tyson didn't fight his first scheduled 10 round bout until he was 14-0 while Joyce debuted in a 10 rounder. Which was what they had looked to continue but, finding it difficult to find 10 round opponents to keep bust enough with. Joyce had to step down to two 8 rounders to keep busy then, he stepped up to a 12 round commonwealth title fight in his fourth pro fight. A title that he's going to defend in another 12 round bout on June 15.
They are also 13 years difference in age during pro development. Big Big difference.